Wakelaw15 wrote:If you have info on class size for your school (class of 2014 to class of 2015 change) or the change in median (class of 2014 to class of 2015) post in this thread. I've been told that Wake Forest kept its medians of the past, but since the wording on this is vague (not specific to class of 2012) i'm guessing there may have been some drop.
***IF YOU WOULD PREFER NOT TO POST NUMBERS IN THIS THREAD FEEL FREE TO PM THEM TO ME INSTEAD***
Total students enrolled
class of 2015/2014
Wake Forest 126/185 (-59)
Vanderbilt 173/193 (-20)
U. Minnesota ~220/245 (~-25)
UC Davis 191/192 (-1)
Hamline ~134/~200 (~-66)
St. Thomas ~150/~150 (no change)
Walter Mitchell 260/309 (-49)
Arizona St. 152/171 (-19)
U. Arizona 125/158 (-33)
U. Texas 300/375 (-75)
UC Hastings 317/414 (-97)
Penn State 170/220 (-50)
WUSTL 203/242 (-39)
UGA 189/225 (-36)
George Mason 147/186 (-39)
George Washington 400/474 (-74)
Valapraiso 163/218 (-55)
Notre Dame 178/183 (-5)
William & Mary 196/217 (-21)
NYU 453/450 (+3)
Seattle University 287/322 (-35)
Case Western 160/195 (-35)
Cooley law school reportedly down several hundred (not included in overall figure)
UVA 358/357 (+1)
U. Kansas 141/141 (0)
Indiana 202/240 (-38)
U. Alabama 155/165 (-10)
USC 188/199 (-11)
Nebraska 136/128 (+8)
Gonzaga smaller class size
University of Houston 216/252 (-48)
Loyola Chicago 283/274 (+9)
BU 211/242 (-31)
CU 153/164 (-11)
Yale 203/205 (-2)
SUNY Buffalo 205/185 (+30)
Wayne state 148/181 (-33)
Michigan St. 298/307 (-9)
U. Michigan 345/359 (-14)
Rutgers-Newark 226/224 (+2)
BC 246/268(-22)
St. Johns 270/293(-23)
U. Chicago 184/195(-11)
Yale 203/205(-2)
Columbia 368/397(-29)
U. Conn 151/181(-30)
Albany 202/233(-31)
UNC 241/248(-7)
Oregon 147/183(-36)
Gonzaga 132/176(-44)
Syracuse 245/255(-10)
Marquette 226/213(+13)
Willamette 136/141(-5)
Vermont 172/151(+21)
Louisville 140/148(+8)
Temple 253/270(-13)
USD 247/300(-53)
Fordham 433/479(-46)
Nova S.eastern 380/354(+26)
Pitt 212/230(-18)
Hawaii 86/116(-30)
Seton Hall 206/266(-60)
Florida State: 187/200 (-13)
Stetson 300/344 (-44)
Oklahoma City 177/201 (-24)
Santa Clara 243/287 (-44)
UCLA 309/320 (-11)
LSU ~200/236(-36)
Duke 208/211 (-3)
New England Law 452/385(+67)
OVERALL (~1,477 fewer students at the above 69 schools).
Medians (LSAT-with change in parentheses; GPA-with change in parentheses)
Wake Forest (#44): 163(0), 3.66(+.06)*** props to WFU for recruiting a smaller class and improving its stats in this law school market.
Vandy (#16): 169 (0), 3.7 (-.03)
UC Davis (#29): 163 (-1), 3.6 (-.03)
University of Georgia (#34): 164 (-1), 3.67 (+.08)
George Mason (#39): 163 (-1), 3.7 (-.02)
U Alabama 165 (0), 3.83 (0)
William & Mary 164 (-1), 3.74 (+.01)
Virginia (#7): 170 (0), 3.87 (+.01)
U. Kansas 157 (0), 3.51 (0)
Indiana U. 164 (-2), 3.8
USC (#18): 167 (0), 3.73 (+.04),
Nebraska (#89): 158 (+1), 3.64 (+.13)
Gonzaga (#113): 155 (0), 3.27 (-.06)
University of Houston 161 (0), 3.47 (+.05)
Berkeley 167 (0), 3.81 (+.02)
CU 164 (0), 3.67 (+.03)
SUNY Buffalo 156 (-1), 3.51 (-.06)
Cornell 167 (-1), 3.68 (+.05)
Wayne State 156 (-1), 3.38 (-.01)
WUSTL 166 (-2), 3.68 (-.02)
UCLA 168, 3.78
BU 166(-1), 3.75(+.03)
BC 164(-1), 3.61(-.05)
Michigan State 157(0), 3.54(0)
Yale 173, 3.9
Columbia 172, 3.71
Charleston 152(0), 3.21(+.08)
UConn 159(0), 3.45(0)
Albany 152(-1), 3.31(0)
UNC 162(-1), 3.5(-.01)
Oregon 158(-1), 3.33(-.06)
Gonzaga 155(0), 3.27(-.06)
Kentucky 158(-1), 3.51(-.06)
Syracuse 153(-2), 3.28(-.08)
Florida 162(0), 3.59(-.05)
Drake 155(-1), 3.30(-.1)
Marquette 155(0), 3.4(+.05)
Willamette 153(-2), 3.18(+.03)
Vermont 153(-1), 3.22(-.04)
Louisville 156(0), 3.44(+.02)
Temple 161(+1), 3.42(+.03)
San Diego 160(0), 3.5(+.07)
Nova S.eastern 150(0), 3.14(-.08)
Hofstra 157(-2), 3.27(-.05)
Seton Hall 158(-1), 3.5(no change)
UCLA (#15): 168 (0), 3.78 (0),
UC Davis (#29): 163 (-1), 3.6 (-.03)
UC Hastings (#44): 162 (0), 3.59 (-.01)
New England law 149(-3), 3.06(-.13)
PLEASE OP, alphabetize this list, or merge it with the thread containing the same (but more complete) information that is ordered by ranking and much easier to read.
This is potentially useful information, but the lack of organization severely compromises its usefulness IMO.