Really? I got into Columbia and had to recently withdraw. My decision there basically was that I didn't like the school when I visited, not to mention the student body seems a lot more intense. But that is a different topic.moneybagsphd wrote:Yup, only school that rejected me. Obviously, if Columbia wasn't worth it to me at sticker, Berkeley wouldn't be either.CoconutP wrote:Haha, only on TLS do you have to show some form of disrespect (calling them trolls) in order to get some evidence.
Redamon, the site you are using is using old employment stats, and it isn't exactly showing where it is getting them from. I'm not arguing with the main fact that those data suggest, which I have always assumed to be true. Thanks for the input.
Money bags, did you apply to UCB?
Berkeley vs UCLA Forum
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
... Not exactly what I meant. If this poll had Columbia as an option, it would be trouncing Berkeley because C has better biglaw placement. And everyone would tell you that "fit" is a bad reason to pick Berkeley over Columbia. I mean, you just have to make the best choice for you.CoconutP wrote: Really? I got into Columbia and had to recently withdraw. My decision there basically was that I didn't like the school when I visited, not to mention the student body seems a lot more intense. But that is a different topic.
If OP goes to berkeley, strikes out at biglaw & PI, he will likely be in debt for 25 years before his loans are forgiven.Lasers wrote:berkeley if you even are thinking of big law.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Didn't really want to get in this discussion, but I think its necessary. "Everyone" would say fit is a bad reason? That's some BS. Culture matters, and success in law school is a lot of times related to mental fitness, which is no doubt improved or worsened by certain schools, depending on the person. Sorry just had to say that. Columbia would be hell for me, but clearly that is not the case for you. Respect.moneybagsphd wrote:... Not exactly what I meant. If this poll had Columbia as an option, it would be trouncing Berkeley because C has better biglaw placement. And everyone would tell you that "fit" is a bad reason to pick Berkeley over Columbia. I mean, you just have to make the best choice for you.CoconutP wrote: Really? I got into Columbia and had to recently withdraw. My decision there basically was that I didn't like the school when I visited, not to mention the student body seems a lot more intense. But that is a different topic.If OP goes to berkeley, strikes out at biglaw & PI, he will likely be in debt for 25 years before his loans are forgiven.Lasers wrote:berkeley if you even are thinking of big law.
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
To be clear, I'm not saying that fit doesn't matter at all; that is the common TLS wisdom. I didn't actually visit Columbia, so I'm not sure how it is there.CoconutP wrote: Didn't really want to get in this discussion, but I think its necessary. "Everyone" would say fit is a bad reason? That's some BS. Culture matters, and success in law school is a lot of times related to mental fitness, which is no doubt improved or worsened by certain schools, depending on the person. Sorry just had to say that. Columbia would be hell for me, but clearly that is not the case for you. Respect.
- Lasers
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
well shit, i guess you're right that even with a 55% chance at biglaw, OP could easily still strike out. i guess it depends on how much OP wants big law, and how debt/risk adverse OP is.moneybagsphd wrote:If OP goes to berkeley, strikes out at biglaw & PI, he will likely be in debt for 25 years before his loans are forgiven.Lasers wrote:berkeley if you even are thinking of big law.
i'd go to berk myself if put in this same situation, but i really don't see a wrong answer here between the two.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Didn't you get top 10% ish your first semester? No doubt you'd be in a good place for biglaw at either of these schools.Lasers wrote:well shit, i guess you're right that even with a 55% chance at biglaw, OP could easily still strike out. i guess it depends on how much OP wants big law, and how debt/risk adverse OP is.moneybagsphd wrote:If OP goes to berkeley, strikes out at biglaw & PI, he will likely be in debt for 25 years before his loans are forgiven.Lasers wrote:berkeley if you even are thinking of big law.
i'd go to berk myself if put in this same situation, but i really don't see a wrong answer here between the two.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Sorry, let me throw a wrench in this. Lets say I do not want to work in big law, what would you say then? I tend to think I am not cut out for big law based on my work experience.
-
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Honestly by your logic you should go to an even lower ranked school and get a full ride with a stipend. The starting salaries for law are bimodal. And the reality is that the lower paying starting law jobs barely exist in CA right now. There is no difference in making a payment on 200k of debt or 75k in debt when you have no job and no job prospects.moneybagsphd wrote:1) Something like that. I'm just going focus on doing well in law school. I will likely try to get a biglaw job (like everyone else). Columbia places like 80% of the class in biglaw (might just be OCI #s)... Getting biglaw from USC is going to be harder, but at least I won't be in a suffocating amount of debt.CoconutP wrote: Are you going to gun for a summer SA position? IF your parents are covering COL and you have 120, then you are really only 30k in debt right, why would you let that balloon to 74k?
Given that Berkeley is winning the poll, I have to agree with common TLS wisdom that there are a lot of Berkeley trolls who can't back up their own school.
2) I will be taking out 5k/year to help my parents...
Basically my advice is to give yourself a decent shot at big law (i.e. go Columbia) or put yourself in a position where you have absolutely no debt and all you need to worry about is finding a job.
-
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
If you want Biglaw then you should go to Berkeley. End of story.CoconutP wrote:Sorry, let me throw a wrench in this. Lets say I do not want to work in big law, what would you say then? I tend to think I am not cut out for big law based on my work experience.
Edit: Misread, go to UCLA if you are 100% sure you don't want big law.
Last edited by shoeshine on Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Lasers
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
i don't know the numbers exactly, but if i'm not mistaken, berkeley's clerkship numbers should be significantly better than ucla's.CoconutP wrote:Sorry, let me throw a wrench in this. Lets say I do not want to work in big law, what would you say then? I tend to think I am not cut out for big law based on my work experience.
still, because banking on that is risky as hell, i'd change my vote to ucla if you don't want big law.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
So why is PI or government so risky? I understand all employment in law is risky to bank on, but is PI and government THAT risky? I visited both schools, and both really tried to allay any concerns I had about pursuing PI or government. I just figure that Berkeley gives me a better shot at both, so thats one reason Im going leaning towards B, if I'm successful then I get LRAP which is nice, if I fail, obviously I'm in a lot of debt, but better positioned for big law?
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
loljim-green wrote:Aren't you Ken who started TLS?shoeshine wrote:If you want big law, the bolded was a huge mistake ... It is insane to gamble 125k on the assumption that you will be top 25%. Having a 60-70% chance at big law at Columbia (or 55% for OP at Berkeley) is much more reasonable. Plus the LRAP programs for students at T14 schools provide a reasonable fall back if you completely strike out.moneybagsphd wrote: Sure, who doesn't want a national degree? ... Berkeley is the better school, there's no two ways about it. But is it worth it to you?
I turned down Columbia at sticker (national) to go to USC (super regional) with a 120k scholarship because the extra money wasn't worth it to me. I didn't want to commit to the maximum term of biglaw to pay down my debt. It was hard to turn down my dream school (and the prestige). Berkeley might be the right decision for you, but you need to be clear about your goals...
- Lawl Shcool
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Brentwood vs. Berkeley? If you think Berkeley is nicer, I want some of your drugs.CoconutP wrote:Stil, this is a hard decision since Berkeley is a much nicer place than UCLA.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lasers
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
haha. i've been to both campuses; uc berkeley's campus is genuinely beautiful, but ucla's campus is probably my favorite campus i've ever visited. not only that, but westwood is pretty darn awesome. i'd definitely agree that ucla is nicer, but it's not like berkeley isn't nice in its own right.Lawl Shcool wrote:Brentwood vs. Berkeley? If you think Berkeley is nicer, I want some of your drugs.CoconutP wrote:Stil, this is a hard decision since Berkeley is a much nicer place than UCLA.
- Lawl Shcool
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
I went to Berkeley, the campus is decent but the surrounding area(s) are pure trash. SoCal is better in every important respect.Lasers wrote:haha. i've been to both campuses; uc berkeley's campus is genuinely beautiful, but ucla's campus is probably my favorite campus i've ever visited. not only that, but westwood is pretty darn awesome. i'd definitely agree that ucla is nicer, but it's not like berkeley isn't nice in its own right.Lawl Shcool wrote:Brentwood vs. Berkeley? If you think Berkeley is nicer, I want some of your drugs.CoconutP wrote:Stil, this is a hard decision since Berkeley is a much nicer place than UCLA.
-
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:39 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
You didn't have in between options? No other T14s with partial money? I mean whatever, ... what's done is done, but not many people make that kind of choice. Best of luck to you- hopefully you destroy the USC curve!moneybagsphd wrote:I don't think so. Then again, I'm not biglaw or bust. I am not certain that I want to work in the biglaw salt mines for 5-7 years. I might love biglaw, I might hate it. If I hate it, I don't want to be stuck with it. My situation is a little different than OP's as my parents are paying COL. My total debt, on a 10yr repayment plan, from USC will be ~74k. My debt from Columbia would have been 290k. That's ~29,000/year for 10 years. Fuck that.shoeshine wrote: If you want big law, the bolded was a huge mistake.
OP's decision is slightly less crazy but I would tell anyone who wants a shot at big law to go T14 (possibly even T10) or don't go to law school. The big law economy has only recovered in the top schools. The regional school are still struggling with big law placement.
It is insane to gamble 125k on the assumption that you will be top 25%. Having a 60-70% chance at big law at Columbia (or 55% for OP at Berkeley) is much more reasonable. Plus the LRAP programs for students at T14 schools provide a reasonable fall back if you completely strike out.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
I went to USC for undergrad. Had I not I probably would take it at 120 over Columbia Sticker purely because of the alumni network in California.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
I went to Berkeley too and have spent a lot of time on UCLA's campus. Berkeley is definitely prettier overall than UCLA. Sure, South side is grimy and overrun with homeless people. And there are tons of mediocre shops-restaurants sustained by naive freshmen who are afraid to wander too far from their dorm rooms. But the city of Berkeley is bigger than the campus. The houses/views on North Side along the hills are phenomenal (I had a place with a view of the Bay). West Side has great shopping-dining options.Lawl Shcool wrote: I went to Berkeley, the campus is decent but the surrounding area(s) are pure trash. SoCal is better in every important respect.
I did. Pretty good money at Cornell and Michigan in fact. But my SO needs to be in a city for her job... Thanks.woeisme wrote: You didn't have in between options? No other T14s with partial money? I mean whatever, ... what's done is done, but not many people make that kind of choice. Best of luck to you- hopefully you destroy the USC curve!
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Our kid was accepted to a daycare on Haste and Shattuck, in the South it looks like from a map. Boalt also appears to be in the South to me. So we are thinking of living near Telegraph and Derby. Is this the grimy Southside you speak of? In that case, I need to rethink.moneybagsphd wrote:I went to Berkeley too and have spent a lot of time on UCLA's campus. Berkeley is definitely prettier overall than UCLA. Sure, South side is grimy and overrun with homeless people. And there are tons of mediocre shops-restaurants sustained by naive freshmen who are afraid to wander too far from their dorm rooms. But the city of Berkeley is bigger than the campus. The houses/views on North Side along the hills are phenomenal (I had a place with a view of the Bay). West Side has great shopping-dining options.
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Kind of... It's south of people's park, so it's not as ridden with homeless people. The griminess is really more of an aesthetic concern than a safety concern, though. I'm not an imposing figure (tallish but rather slender) and I've wandered South Side at all hours of the night without problems. Stick to main, well-lit streets. However, I wouldn't recommend Telegraph to someone situated with a family. I would recommend somewhere on North Side (although it might be a hassle getting your kid to and from day care). Send me a PM if you have any specific questions.jim-green wrote:Our kid was accepted to a daycare on Haste and Shattuck, in the South it looks like from a map. Boalt also appears to be in the South to me. So we are thinking of living near Telegraph and Derby. Is this the grimy Southside you speak of? In that case, I need to rethink.moneybagsphd wrote:I went to Berkeley too and have spent a lot of time on UCLA's campus. Berkeley is definitely prettier overall than UCLA. Sure, South side is grimy and overrun with homeless people. And there are tons of mediocre shops-restaurants sustained by naive freshmen who are afraid to wander too far from their dorm rooms. But the city of Berkeley is bigger than the campus. The houses/views on North Side along the hills are phenomenal (I had a place with a view of the Bay). West Side has great shopping-dining options.
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:21 am
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
I agree with the poster. The griminess is more aesthetic than safety. I've walked on southside at all hours, too w/o problems, though I was never near Derby at 11pm/12am at night. The farther you are from campus, the more crime.moneybagsphd wrote:Kind of... It's south of people's park, so it's not as ridden with homeless people. The griminess is really more of an aesthetic concern than a safety concern, though. I'm not an imposing figure (tallish but rather slender) and I've wandered South Side at all hours of the night without problems. Stick to main, well-lit streets. However, I wouldn't recommend Telegraph to someone situated with a family. I would recommend somewhere on North Side (although it might be a hassle getting your kid to and from day care). Send me a PM if you have any specific questions.jim-green wrote:Our kid was accepted to a daycare on Haste and Shattuck, in the South it looks like from a map. Boalt also appears to be in the South to me. So we are thinking of living near Telegraph and Derby. Is this the grimy Southside you speak of? In that case, I need to rethink.moneybagsphd wrote:I went to Berkeley too and have spent a lot of time on UCLA's campus. Berkeley is definitely prettier overall than UCLA. Sure, South side is grimy and overrun with homeless people. And there are tons of mediocre shops-restaurants sustained by naive freshmen who are afraid to wander too far from their dorm rooms. But the city of Berkeley is bigger than the campus. The houses/views on North Side along the hills are phenomenal (I had a place with a view of the Bay). West Side has great shopping-dining options.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
Wow, I dont know if you are from CA now, or do you have your head in a hole? I grew up in CA and graduated from HS in SoCal and not a single person I met thought they were "the same" when someone said they were going to berk for college it was a "Holy shit this guy is smart" moment. If it was UCLA, it was more of a "o, cool"CoconutP wrote:I'm assuming you aren't from California. It seems that everywhere, except California, people have the idea that UCB and UCLA are not peer, whereas here, most assume they are essentially the same, maybe UCB being a bit better. I'm a little confused by UCB's prestige; I can't find much reason to think that students there are any smarter, productive, or successful than UCLA students, and this goes for undergrad and grad programs. Stil, this is a hard decision since Berkeley is a much nicer place than UCLA.woeisme wrote:Peer schools...
no, just kidding. I'd probably take the money here though.
That was stupid, I know, but seriously people in CA dont think that. Unless you are from a poor uneducated area
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
This is probably a stupid point to argue. But I want to address that you are referring to your high school friends. Go talk to any working professional. Berkeley raises an eyebrow because its more exclusive, not because it has smarter people.AssumptionRequired wrote:Wow, I dont know if you are from CA now, or do you have your head in a hole? I grew up in CA and graduated from HS in SoCal and not a single person I met thought they were "the same" when someone said they were going to berk for college it was a "Holy shit this guy is smart" moment. If it was UCLA, it was more of a "o, cool"CoconutP wrote:I'm assuming you aren't from California. It seems that everywhere, except California, people have the idea that UCB and UCLA are not peer, whereas here, most assume they are essentially the same, maybe UCB being a bit better. I'm a little confused by UCB's prestige; I can't find much reason to think that students there are any smarter, productive, or successful than UCLA students, and this goes for undergrad and grad programs. Stil, this is a hard decision since Berkeley is a much nicer place than UCLA.woeisme wrote:Peer schools...
no, just kidding. I'd probably take the money here though.
That was stupid, I know, but seriously people in CA dont think that. Unless you are from a poor uneducated area
- Lasers
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
i second this general idea, though from all my experiences, ucla is very highly regarded as well and illicited more than a "oh, cool" response. in fact, for undergrad, i know friends who chose ucla over berkeley (who cares about undergrad, anyway?!).AssumptionRequired wrote:Wow, I dont know if you are from CA now, or do you have your head in a hole? I grew up in CA and graduated from HS in SoCal and not a single person I met thought they were "the same" when someone said they were going to berk for college it was a "Holy shit this guy is smart" moment. If it was UCLA, it was more of a "o, cool"CoconutP wrote:I'm assuming you aren't from California. It seems that everywhere, except California, people have the idea that UCB and UCLA are not peer, whereas here, most assume they are essentially the same, maybe UCB being a bit better. I'm a little confused by UCB's prestige; I can't find much reason to think that students there are any smarter, productive, or successful than UCLA students, and this goes for undergrad and grad programs. Stil, this is a hard decision since Berkeley is a much nicer place than UCLA.woeisme wrote:Peer schools...
no, just kidding. I'd probably take the money here though.
That was stupid, I know, but seriously people in CA dont think that. Unless you are from a poor uneducated area
for law school though, it seems like berkeley is clearly regarded as a better institution (though some lay people in socal may think they are on par).
- ocajavati
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:15 am
Re: Berkeley vs UCLA
I've always wondered why people never consider the unlikely scenario of not getting big law coming out of Berkeley.
I'm sure some people don't. In the unlikely scenario that you happen to be one of those people, you'll be staring down a near $300k debt with little ways to repay it.
A scary prospect if you ask me.
I'm sure some people don't. In the unlikely scenario that you happen to be one of those people, you'll be staring down a near $300k debt with little ways to repay it.
A scary prospect if you ask me.
That's... entirely untrue. I think it has more to do with region. SoCal people believe UCLA to be on par with Berkeley, whereas it wouldn't make much sense to relocate from North Cal if you got into both. Depends on the major, really. But as far as lay prestige goes, UCB is only slightly above UCLA, at least for those living in SoCal.AssumptionRequired wrote:CoconutP wrote:
That was stupid, I know, but seriously people in CA dont think that. Unless you are from a poor uneducated area
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login