Top Law Schools

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote: If you say so.

I know you think proximity of law building to undergrad campus is a great thing to base your decision on but the rest of the world and I are going to stick with employment prospects

This point was never stated but ok.

BearsGrl wrote:Both schools have different draws. One is attached to a campus setting, the other is a stand-alone building. Stetson's UG and law school are separate from one another.

Mal Reynolds wrote:Bearsgrl, let me ask you a question. Have you noticed how almost every thread you participate in explodes with people who disagree with you? Do you think that's because many of your thoughts aren't all that reasonable or do you have another explanation?

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote: If you say so.

I know you think proximity of law building to undergrad campus is a great thing to base your decision on but the rest of the world and I are going to stick with employment prospects

This point was never stated but ok.

BearsGrl wrote:Both schools have different draws. One is attached to a campus setting, the other is a stand-alone building. Stetson's UG and law school are separate from one another.

BearsGrl wrote:

Mal Reynolds wrote:Bearsgrl, let me ask you a question. Have you noticed how almost every thread you participate in explodes with people who disagree with you? Do you think that's because many of your thoughts aren't all that reasonable or do you have another explanation?

If it were not typical posters at every turn, then I would note the difference. However, that's not the case. So yes, I have my own explanation. Will I state that explanation? No need.

OP had a question. If your post isn't tangential to that, I don't see why there is a need to post.

BearsGrl wrote: It was already said pages ago that this wasn't the meaning of draw. It's not my fault if you failed to read that particular post.

Don't be mad because you don't busy yourself in your local city. Apparently you are fine with that opportunity cost. You've stated your opinion to OP, yet you're still around. It makes no sense why.

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:

Mal Reynolds wrote:Bearsgrl, let me ask you a question. Have you noticed how almost every thread you participate in explodes with people who disagree with you? Do you think that's because many of your thoughts aren't all that reasonable or do you have another explanation?

If it were not typical posters at every turn, then I would note the difference. However, that's not the case. So yes, I have my own explanation. Will I state that explanation? No need.

OP had a question. If your post isn't tangential to that, I don't see why there is a need to post.

But it's not just the typical posters. There are regulars that are entertained by your trolling and like to post in all your threads, but in every thread there have been different people as well and know one has ever defended your point of view.

FeelTheHeat wrote:I swung by Nova two days ago to pick up a BlueBook. They didn't have one.

BearsGrl wrote:

FeelTheHeat wrote:I swung by Nova two days ago to pick up a BlueBook. They didn't have one.

Why would you buy any book at a school? And specifically, why would you buy a Bluebook on a campus? Unless your school offers a discount, it's cheaper at other locations.

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:

Mal Reynolds wrote:Bearsgrl, let me ask you a question. Have you noticed how almost every thread you participate in explodes with people who disagree with you? Do you think that's because many of your thoughts aren't all that reasonable or do you have another explanation?

If it were not typical posters at every turn, then I would note the difference. However, that's not the case. So yes, I have my own explanation. Will I state that explanation? No need.

OP had a question. If your post isn't tangential to that, I don't see why there is a need to post.

But it's not just the typical posters. There are regulars that are entertained by your trolling and like to post in all your threads, but in every thread there have been different people as well and know one has ever defended your point of view.

Know one? Huh? When I refer to typical posting, I refer to the notion that 7 or 8 out of 10 of the posters that continue to post are regulars. It amazes me that people become regular posters. I find that an extremely fascinating concept.

Ludovico Technique wrote:
1. Apology for the typo.

2. Why does it matter if most of the people are regulars when it's still everyone who disagrees with you?

3. You have 4.26 posts per day. You can't keep pretending that you are so much better than us loser "regulars" hanging out on a Thursday night when you're doing the same thing and post just as much

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:
1. Apology for the typo.

2. Why does it matter if most of the people are regulars when it's still everyone who disagrees with you?

3. You have 4.26 posts per day. You can't keep pretending that you are so much better than us loser "regulars" hanging out on a Thursday night when you're doing the same thing and post just as much

to point #1. I was just having fun with ya.

The fact that people care how many times someone posts a day tells me that you're a regular and unless you work for any website and are getting paid/earning internship credits, I just find this comical. It's like you having one of those badges that people get on a site like Daily Kos or Huffington Post or something. I just find that stuff funny.

Also, why would I care if someone disagrees with me? Is my life or future job predicated on who agrees with me on an internet site? No. If you wish to guide your life by statistical data, then go ahead and do so. But predicate all of your future statements with this caveat. If I did this, I know that my resume would be totally different than where it stands as of now and I wouldn't have had select opportunities. To each his or her own considerations.

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:
1. Apology for the typo.

2. Why does it matter if most of the people are regulars when it's still everyone who disagrees with you?

3. You have 4.26 posts per day. You can't keep pretending that you are so much better than us loser "regulars" hanging out on a Thursday night when you're doing the same thing and post just as much

to point #1. I was just having fun with ya.

The fact that people care how many times someone posts a day tells me that you're a regular and unless you work for any website and are getting paid/earning internship credits, I just find this comical. It's like you having one of those badges that people get on a site like Daily Kos or Huffington Post or something. I just find that stuff funny.

Also, why would I care if someone disagrees with me? Is my life or future job predicated on who agrees with me on an internet site? No. If you wish to guide your life by statistical data, then go ahead and do so. But predicate all of your future statements with this caveat. If I did this, I know that my resume would be totally different than where it stands as of now and I wouldn't have had select opportunities. To each his or her own considerations.

It wasn't that hard to just click on your profile and see how much you post. I don't care if you post a lot, it's just stupid to shit on somebody for being a regular when you're pretty much a regular too.

Nobody is saying "guide your life by statistical data." We're saying don't go to shitty law schools and we know that Stetson is a shitty law school because of statistical data.

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

I think everyone says so. You're the only one that doesn't.

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

I think everyone says so. You're the only one that doesn't.

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

I think everyone says so. You're the only one that doesn't.

By everyone, you should predicate that with everyone on TLS, which essentially means no one. You judge everything by statistics, you should know that.

BearsGrl wrote: If you wish to guide your life by statistical data, then go ahead and do so. But predicate all of your future statements with this caveat. If I did this, I know that my resume would be totally different than where it stands as of now and I wouldn't have had select opportunities. To each his or her own considerations.

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

I think everyone says so. You're the only one that doesn't.

By everyone, you should predicate that with everyone on TLS, which essentially means no one. You judge everything by statistics, you should know that.

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

I think everyone says so. You're the only one that doesn't.

By everyone, you should predicate that with everyone on TLS, which essentially means no one. You judge everything by statistics, you should know that.

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:

Ludovico Technique wrote:

BearsGrl wrote:
If you say so.

I think everyone says so. You're the only one that doesn't.

By everyone, you should predicate that with everyone on TLS, which essentially means no one. You judge everything by statistics, you should know that.

If there are people as informed about law school admissions and legal job prospects as the people on TLS, find them and I'm sure they'll disagree with you too.

I don't judge everything by statistics. I judge law schools by employment statistics, which is what any sane person would do.