Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Where would you go?
Michigan 75k 27%  27%  [ 17 ]
Duke 105k 72%  72%  [ 45 ]
Total votes : 62
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 4:26 am
Posts: 423
Let's limit the discussion to DUKE v. MICHIGAN....

Furthermore, reading comprehension is CRITICAL to the success of a law student.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 1983
sdphill wrote:
Let's limit the discussion to DUKE v. MICHIGAN....

Furthermore, reading comprehension is CRITICAL to the success of a law student.

y u mad tho


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
My days of not being taken seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Posts: 4813
sdphill wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:

I never said you have to choose Columbia. But not having it listed as an option is dumb. You are trying to manipulate the feedback you get. You best options are between Duke and Columbia. Choose whatever one at this point will make you happier I guess. But sorry, a $35k difference between Duke and Columbia is immaterial. If you choose Duke it will be because of personal preferences, thus rendering the point of this thread moot.


1) Referring to a woman as "dude/bra" is really rude... If you don't know the sex of the person, use gender neutral terms.


Lol you definitely mad.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:09 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 5860
Mal Reynolds wrote:
sdphill wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:

I never said you have to choose Columbia. But not having it listed as an option is dumb. You are trying to manipulate the feedback you get. You best options are between Duke and Columbia. Choose whatever one at this point will make you happier I guess. But sorry, a $35k difference between Duke and Columbia is immaterial. If you choose Duke it will be because of personal preferences, thus rendering the point of this thread moot.


1) Referring to a woman as "dude/bra" is really rude... If you don't know the sex of the person, use gender neutral terms.


Lol you definitely mad, bra.

Fixed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 4:26 am
Posts: 423
No one is angry...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Posts: 858
I guess I can see picking Duke over Columbia if, when you were saying you want to do NGO work abroad, what you actually meant was "I want to do BigLaw in Atlanta". Or if your spouse has promised to divorce you if you so much as set foot in NYC, for whatever reason.

Columbia is still TCR.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 1983
sdphill wrote:
No one is angry...

Sorry, I must have misunderstood your extra large type, as well as the import of you sharing your deep 0L insight regarding reading comp importance to law students. My b.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:16 pm
Posts: 349
.


Last edited by 83947368 on Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 890
I'd say Duke given how this thread turned out. lol.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 802
Adm.Doppleganger wrote:
I don't get it, why is everyone telling OP to just go to a school that she clearly doesn't want to go to? Personally I'd go to Columbia but given her clear aversion that just seems like awful advice.


This is what OP said:
Quote:
I would love to go to Columbia but I have to be realistic about the type of work I want to do and where I will be potentially living post graduation. The remainder of tuition + COL in NYC is a bit too high for me and I am not particularly fond of NYC. But more so its the COL.
"I would love to go to Columbia" doesn't sound like a clear aversion to me. It's obviously the COL that's the main problem but people keep trying to explain that 1) any difference in cost is worth it for CLS given OP's goals and 2) LRAP should make the extra debt essentially a non-issue anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 12:34 am 
Offline
My days of not being taken seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Posts: 4813
You better stop talking about Columbia or sdphill is gonna come white knight for OP again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 4:26 am
Posts: 423
Mal Reynolds wrote:
You better stop talking about Columbia or sdphill is gonna come white knight for OP again.


I love your sarcasm... ^_^


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Posts: 1092
sdphill wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:
You better stop talking about Columbia or sdphill is gonna come white knight for OP again.


I love you ^_^


:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:41 pm
Posts: 165
For what you want: Duke.

Then again, take my advice with a grain of salt. Full disclosure is I'm on Mich's WL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Duke $$ v. Michigan $$
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:37 pm
Posts: 156
Cartman wrote:
For what you want: Duke.

Then again, take my advice with a grain of salt. Full disclosure is I'm on Mich's WL.


Haha. Oh Cartman, I love that you just posted that.

(+1)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FamilyLawEsq, Micdiddy, miguelfoogo, ndel21, schwaghog56, scotth724, TookDaBait, totoro, willwilliams1334 and 17 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB