school...
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:40 am
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=181929
Fixed.Smooth Sail wrote:I see that school rankings mean something to a lot of people; however, Icouldcouldn't care less about them.
Ouch, I'm really sorry mate. Dammit! I did it again... But at least I bumped your thread, right?Smooth Sail wrote:Thank you for the fix.
My pet peeve is when people have the audacity to disregard the topic and find themselves time to fix grammatical errors. Good thing I didn't type in short hand or code like most of the posts on this site.
Please respond if you have any insight about the schools I have listed.
Thank you for your time.
Respectfully,
Smooth Sail
Someone please explain to him all the things that are wrong with the above sentences.I see that school rankings mean something to a lot of people; however, I couldn't care less about them. After hours of research, I have seen many non-T14 alums in "big law" and prestigious firms. I firmly believe every person has to carry their own weight, and with a decent personality and good education, they should be able to succeed in their specialized fields.
These are fucking ridiculous.Smooth Sail wrote:
Stipulations of scholarships:
Lewis and Clark-Top 20%
Whittier-Top 5%
Texas Tech is the only halfway decent option out of here, and it's not great. 3.79 is a great GPA, any way to convince you of a retake?Smooth Sail wrote:Syracuse, Texas Tech, McGeorge, Tulsa-Top 50%
Those stipulations on L&C and Whittier are pretty rough. If you lose that $$$ you are pretty screwed considering it seems the GI Bill won't cover those schools (not familiar with it just basing that on the schools you've listed that it covers). I would have to say that the better the school, the better prospects you have all around, obviously. So, even if you don't want BigLaw, you're prospects for PI/Small firms are going to be much better if you were to graduate from a T14. Another thing to keep in mind is that (and this should be confirmed by others) small/mid-sized firms probably like to hire experienced attorneys so as not to have to spend so much money on recruitment/training. You're GPA is pretty awesome from UG and the military experience is fantastic for softs. The only thing holding you back is that LSAT. In this case, retake is definitely warranted. If you can bump that into the mid 160s you are looking at much higher-caliber schools and perhaps even a T14 or two if you ED (UVA? NU?).Smooth Sail wrote:My GPA is 3.79,cum laude/LSAT 154. Yes, I am married. My wife will be caring for the kids at home. I have saved enough money for the next five years (I began planning for law school while in the Marine Corp, even before family).
Stipulations of scholarships:
Lewis and Clark-Top 20%
Syracuse, Texas Tech, McGeorge, Tulsa-Top 50%
Whittier-Top 5%
By the way, stipulations will not matter at Syracuse, Texas Tech, McGeorge, and Tulsa. If I lose my scholarship, my GI Bill will cover the cost of tuition.
Not sure how this is relevant to this particular thread, but you are probably right. This will definitely make an awesome personal statement topic! Not sure what you wrote your PS on but if you talk about this you are going to be golden. I come from a very unique background as well, and having written my PS on that made a big difference in my admissions I think. Several acceptance letters had hand-written mentions of my PS.Smooth Sail wrote: I've seen life in a different way than most, only another combat veteran could fathom similar experiences.
No offense, but if you can't sit still for 4 hours, law school might not be the right choice for you .Smooth Sail wrote:
I did retake the LSAT, and both times I had to stop in the third section. I scored the same for completing two complete sections (analytic, logical), and one set of the reading comprehension section. Unfortunately, my health prevents me from sitting for the whole test. I was wounded in combat, and my body is paying dearly for the injuries.
Jesus bro, that's unfortunate. Especially (if I am reading this right) you were able to get a 154 leaving 2 entire sections blank.Smooth Sail wrote:I prefer California and New york, but I will go where the job sends me.
I did retake the LSAT, and both times I had to stop in the third section. I scored the same for completing two complete sections (analytic, logical), and one set of the reading comprehension section. Unfortunately, my health prevents me from sitting for the whole test. I was wounded in combat, and my body is paying dearly for the injuries.
Hence, the reason I'm looking for the solid education. I could only hope for the best when it comes to job placement from the current list of schools. I'm also not going to wait for them to place me, I will be out there hustling myself.
Respectfully,
Smooth Sail
I am almost certain LSAC needs to accommodate you if it is a legitimate disability (which it sounds like it may be). Not sure what they can do, but they may be able to give you more time --which would be the only advantage you need since the LSAT's difficulty is derived from the time constraints. Maybe I am wrong, but it just doesn't seem right to me if they don't at least make some effort to make an accommodation for a genuine disability.Smooth Sail wrote:I did retake the LSAT, and both times I had to stop in the third section. I scored the same for completing two complete sections (analytic, logical), and one set of the reading comprehension section. Unfortunately, my health prevents me from sitting for the whole test. I was wounded in combat, and my body is paying dearly for the injuries.
It doesn't sound to me like he needs more time on the actual test, but perhaps a break between sections. I'd look into that. Seems reasonable.TLS_noobie wrote:
I am almost certain LSAC needs to accommodate you if it is a legitimate disability (which it sounds like it may be). Not sure what they can do, but they may be able to give you more time --which would be the only advantage you need since the LSAT's difficulty is derived from the time constraints. Maybe I am wrong, but it just doesn't seem right to me if they don't at least make some effort to make an accommodation for a genuine disability.
I understand the sentiment, but the reality is there is a likely chance you will end up never practicing law out of these schools. Less than 60% of law grads in '09 obtained full time JD required employment. Many of these schools are in saturated markets, place super regionally into small and insular markets, or you stand a huge chance at losing your scholarship.Smooth Sail wrote:
I set a goal to be an attorney as a child. So far, I have yet to fail a goal. Unfortunately, my LSAT score is what it is. It's a bit sad how that one number determines the quality of school I will attend, but the end result is that I want to be an attorney. I have an opportunity to minimize my debt, and I have saved income to pursue this next goal.
This is rough. I think you are doing a disservice to yourself though if you settle for that LSAT score. I would say give it one more shot and see what happens. Study your arse off and see if you can improve your score even with your condition. If you can break 160 it will be even more likely you will accomplish your goal.Smooth Sail wrote:The first test was not accommodated (didn't know LSAC did such a thing). The second test I did receive accommodations: a private room next to a bathroom, podium, and a stopwatch to stop my 35-minute sections for bathroom breaks. I did not receive additional time. I have a broken spine, and a disease that is destroying my intestines. I constantly bleed and have to use the restroom. I recently had my eighth surgery and so far I am doing better. I have a few more issues; however, I will not post them.
I set a goal to be an attorney as a child. So far, I have yet to fail a goal. Unfortunately, my LSAT score is what it is. It's a bit sad how that one number determines the quality of school I will attend, but the end result is that I want to be an attorney. I have an opportunity to minimize my debt, and I have saved income to pursue this next goal.
Respectfully,
Smooth Sail
Not if you're content with being in Texas. L&C is one of those schools that seems to be respected in the region but its placement isn't that good, which is obviously contradictory. Also it's my understanding from what I've read here and elsewhere that the PNW is quite unfriendly to outsiders. So there's that, too.Smooth Sail wrote:Thank you, tfleming09.
I like Texas Tech as well. I have already started the email process with Hastings. I've sent them a missive every week. I don't know if I am over doing it, but I am hoping they know I am serious.
If I lose the scholarship at Lewis & Clark, my GI Bill with the Yellow Ribbon Program will cover $27,500.00 out of their ~$38,000.00 tuition. If all fails with the wait list, should I choice L & C over a full ride at Texas Tech?
Respectfully,
Smooth Sail
This is worthless. You think a recruiter from a firm in Oklahoma thinks higher and would rather recruit out of a school like UW than they do OU? This is national perception when it's regional perception that actually matters.calawdude wrote:Smooth Sail, you are my new hero, man. That's rough, but you sound very determined. I hope you get into the school of your choice and end up at your dream job. Going into private practice immediately out of law school can be tough, so you might have to start with biglaw. Here's a list of what firm recruiters think of schools:
Ranking by US News of what recruiters think about schools, and a year old, I believe, but still, should serve as a good reference. You said you don't care about the rankings, but there might be some truth to this since this is coming straight from the recruiters:
List of schools