2013 Rankings

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
desertlaw
Posts: 679
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:03 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby desertlaw » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:41 pm

Where's the link to last year's rank? ASU seems to have jumped a bunch? Up to 26 now.

User avatar
JusticeHarlan
Posts: 1434
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby JusticeHarlan » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:42 pm

rad lulz wrote:
sangr wrote:does anyone foresee them hittin t-14?

If they do, it WON'T FUCKING MATTER FOR SHIT

Nah bro, Texas hit T14 last year, changed everything.

Incubateus
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:23 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby Incubateus » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:42 pm

ASU? What a jump. W&L with a come back? Brett Twitty is amazing. This blows March Madness away.

User avatar
TLS_noobie
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby TLS_noobie » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:42 pm

Does this mean anything? Will some firms now not come to schools that were in top25 in the past but now are out? Seems unlikely, but I have heard of firms having separate cutoffs depending on USNWR rankings and will this mean that some schools will be held to a higher standard? (i.e. BC/BU more specifically)

User avatar
Flash
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:24 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby Flash » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:42 pm

TemporarySaint wrote:
chiwachiwa wrote:Can anyone with a pay account post the data?


Who the fuck actually ponies up money for that shit?

You could get a free year at some point.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby rad lulz » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:43 pm

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
skers
Posts: 4950
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby skers » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:44 pm

TLS_noobie wrote:Does this mean anything? Will some firms now not come to schools that were in top25 in the past but now are out? Seems unlikely, but I have heard of firms having separate cutoffs depending on USNWR rankings and will this mean that some schools will be held to a higher standard? (i.e. BC/BU more specifically)


Callbacks are strictly apportioned according to the official us news rankings.

User avatar
top30man
Posts: 1224
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby top30man » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:44 pm

TLS_noobie wrote:Does this mean anything? Will some firms now not come to schools that were in top25 in the past but now are out? Seems unlikely, but I have heard of firms having separate cutoffs depending on USNWR rankings and will this mean that some schools will be held to a higher standard? (i.e. BC/BU more specifically)

Dubious.

071816
Posts: 5511
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby 071816 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:44 pm

weird that so many relatively shitty schools are above BU/BC

These rankings seem pretty fucked.

User avatar
Arbiter213
Posts: 2249
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby Arbiter213 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:44 pm

doomed123 wrote:So... any suicides over at Cornell yet?


Give us time.

Also, all the "it's t12 now" trolling is stupid. I'll miss the t13 stuff but at least that made sense. Still the exact same 14 as it always has been.
Last edited by Arbiter213 on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

duckmoney
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby duckmoney » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:45 pm

Can someone post the employment data?

User avatar
Bronck
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby Bronck » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:45 pm

TemporarySaint wrote:
TLS_noobie wrote:Does this mean anything? Will some firms now not come to schools that were in top25 in the past but now are out? Seems unlikely, but I have heard of firms having separate cutoffs depending on USNWR rankings and will this mean that some schools will be held to a higher standard? (i.e. BC/BU more specifically)


Callbacks are strictly apportioned according to the official us news rankings.


+1

User avatar
danquayle
Posts: 1108
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby danquayle » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:45 pm

U Wash higher than WUSTL isn't really that crazy. The midwest legal market is both saturated and still suffering from the recession, while U Washington has home school advantage in a city with one of the strongest economies in the country. I mean who is UW really competing with outside of the California schools and the occassionally T14 drifter?

Edit: To some extent, these rankings are going to map to the larger economic and demographic trends the country experiences. Given that Arizona keeps growing at a faster pace than most of the country, its also not surprising that ASU/Arizona keep improving. (Though 26 does seem inflated).
Last edited by danquayle on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
YCrevolution
Posts: 4714
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby YCrevolution » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:45 pm

..

User avatar
cubbiesyear
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 12:42 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby cubbiesyear » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm

Yawn.

User avatar
Gail
Posts: 977
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:11 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby Gail » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm

YCrevolution wrote:I have premium access to USNWR for those interested in how particular schools fared.


PM?

HellOnHeels
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:19 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby HellOnHeels » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm

duckmoney wrote:Can someone post the employment data?

Also interested in this (maryland specifically)

User avatar
JusticeHarlan
Posts: 1434
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby JusticeHarlan » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm

duckmoney wrote:Can someone post the employment data?

Employed at 9 months is available for free, just click on the school.

Edit: my bad, they have at graduation rates for each school, not 9 months out.
Last edited by JusticeHarlan on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby rad lulz » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Excellent117
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:44 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby Excellent117 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:46 pm

RonnyDworkin wrote:Anyone have more detailed data? The raw score data is definitely useful. Any data on medians and the assessment scores?


#1 Yale: 170-177 LSAT, 3.83-3.96 GPA -- 173 and 3.9 medians -- 91.8% employed after 9 months

#2 Stanford: 167-172 LSAT, 3.72-3.93 GPA -- 170 and 3.85 medians -- 97.1% employed after 9 months

#3 Harvard: 171-176 LSAT, 3.78-3.97 GPA -- 173 and 3.89 medians -- 94.6% employed after 9 months

#4 Columbia: 170-175 LSAT, 3.6-3.82 GPA -- 172 and 3.72 medians -- 96.5% employed after 9 months

#5 Chicago: 167-173 LSAT, 3.71-3.94 GPA -- 171 and 3.87 medians -- 97.9% employed after 9 months

#6 NYU: 170-174 LSAT, 3.57-3.85 GPA -- 172 and 3.71 medians -- 96.6% employed after 9 months

#7 Berkeley: 164-169 LSAT, 3.62-3.88 GPA -- 167 and 3.79 medians -- 93.6% employed after 9 months

#7 Penn: 166-171 LSAT, 3.58-3.93 GPA -- 170 and 3.86 medians -- 96% employed after 9 months

#7 Virginia: 165-171 LSAT, 3.49-3.94 GPA -- 170 and 3.86 medians -- 98.1% employed after 9 months

#10 Michigan: 167-170 LSAT, 3.59-3.87 GPA -- 169 and 3.76 medians -- 92.2% employed after 9 months

#11 Duke: 167-171 LSAT, 3.62-3.84 GPA -- 170 and 3.75 medians -- 94.8% employed after 9 months

#12 Northwestern: 165-171 LSAT, 3.35-3.85 GPA -- 170 and 3.8 medians -- 94% employed after 9 months

#13 Georgetown: 167-171 LSAT, 3.44-3.8 GPA -- 170 and 3.71 medians -- 96% employed after 9 months

#14 Cornell: 166-169 LSAT, 3.5-3.77 GPA -- 168 and 3.63 medians -- 96.9% employed after 9 months


Hope this helps

User avatar
brogoc
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby brogoc » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:47 pm

.
Last edited by brogoc on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin
Posts: 2468
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby Big Shrimpin » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:47 pm

YCrevolution wrote:I have premium access to USNWR for those interested in how particular schools fared.



Create mega-data poast?

User avatar
DaftAndDirect
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Postby DaftAndDirect » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:47 pm

Argh. Not that the Mich drop matters that much. But it does.

splittinghairs
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby splittinghairs » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:47 pm

YCrevolution wrote:I have premium access to USNWR for those interested in how particular schools fared.


So whos in charge of updating on TLS front page?

Also, its just a suggestion but, dont you think the front page should have the Medians listed for all the schools rather than just 25-75 percentile.

User avatar
moneybagsphd
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Postby moneybagsphd » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:47 pm

chimp wrote:These rankings seem pretty fucked.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: carlos_danger, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests