(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
- Posts: 3811
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Blindmelon wrote:stillwater wrote:splittinghairs wrote:TLS_noobie wrote:Are there new employment numbers associated with these rankings that we haven't seen yet on TLS? I don't know USNWR methodologies (and can't click the link on their page for it because it is broken right now) but does UMinn/UWash/ASU really place better than BU/BC/Fordham? What other factors could possibly be more important than employment placement? My feeble mind is confused....
Simple ASU might have given out a greater percentage of post graduate "fellowships," therefore their employments are better according to USNEWS, its a joke
Their employed after 9 months percentage is much higher than BU, BC, Fordham, etc. in the USNWR data.
Employment numbers mean nothing. GW/Emory are at 60% at graduation, and they're 20 and 24. US News measures US News success, not employment prospects.
I'm talking about the data they used to compute these... I am not attesting to their veracity or integrity.
Last edited by stillwater on Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Blindmelon wrote:lol at GW (56%) and Emory having below 60% employment rates and being ranked well above Fordham, BU, BC. What the hell are these rankings supposed to measure anyway?
At least they are being honest, right?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest