2013 Rankings
-
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
They have UT's in state tuition cost listed incorrectly...
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:09 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Does anyone have the LSAT/GPA scores of the T14...I dont feel like paying U.S. News.
- PitchO20
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
lmao Villanova is TTT
- RonnyDworkin
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:01 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Anyone have more detailed data? The raw score data is definitely useful. Any data on medians and the assessment scores?
-
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
onoez...ranking dropped. will i be no offered???
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Assessment scores:
Y 4.7
S 4.7
H 4.8
C 4.6
C 4.6
N 4.5
B 4.4
P 4.5
V 4.6
M 4.6
D 4.4
N 4.4
G 4.5
C 4.4
Y 4.7
S 4.7
H 4.8
C 4.6
C 4.6
N 4.5
B 4.4
P 4.5
V 4.6
M 4.6
D 4.4
N 4.4
G 4.5
C 4.4
- top30man
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Also lol at Washington and Lee. USNWR is driving drunk.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:18 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
The list isn't officially up yet...that link i posted is how to see them. Change the number at the end of the original link to see the other pages of the 2012 rankings
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
sorry dude, your harvard degree wont carry u as far anymore
f0bolous wrote:onoez...ranking dropped. will i be no offered???
- PrincetonLaw
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Disappointed with UT's drop but doesn't really matter :shrug:
- TLS_noobie
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Are there new employment numbers associated with these rankings that we haven't seen yet on TLS? I don't know USNWR methodologies (and can't click the link on their page for it because it is broken right now) but does UMinn/UWash/ASU really place better than BU/BC/Fordham? What other factors could possibly be more important than employment placement? My feeble mind is confused....
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:05 am
Re: The official rankings release thread
So... any suicides over at Cornell yet?
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Minnesota moved up to 19 sweeeeeet haha
- JDizzle2015
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
hoya2012 wrote:The list isn't officially up yet...that link i posted is how to see them. Change the number at the end of the original link to see the other pages of the 2012 rankings
What is this?
- ilovesf
- Posts: 12838
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
TLS_noobie wrote:Are there new employment numbers associated with these rankings that we haven't seen yet on TLS? I don't know USNWR methodologies (and can't click the link on their page for it because it is broken right now) but does UMinn/UWash/ASU really place better than BU/BC/Fordham? What other factors could possibly be more important than employment placement? My feeble mind is confused....
this is the reason the rankings are lulzy. they calculate things like library size.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Yeah are the medians used in this ranking going to be new medians? If so I'd be really interested to see Harvard's. Since their reputation score was higher than Yale's and Stanford's, I wonder if a drop in medians accounted for their fall in the rankings. Anyone have access?
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
TLS_noobie wrote:Are there new employment numbers associated with these rankings that we haven't seen yet on TLS? I don't know USNWR methodologies (and can't click the link on their page for it because it is broken right now) but does UMinn/UWash/ASU really place better than BU/BC/Fordham? What other factors could possibly be more important than employment placement? My feeble mind is confused....
Simple ASU might have given out a greater percentage of post graduate "fellowships," therefore their employments are better according to USNEWS, its a joke
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:26 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
US News has an error on their website. Click on each school and you can see their 2013 rankings. Below is the list of the first 25:
1. Yale
2. Stanford
3. Harvard
4. Columbia
5. Chicago
6. NYU
7. Berkley
7. Penn
7. Virginia
10. Michigan
11. Duke
12. Northwestern
13. Georgetown
14. Cornell
15. UCLA
16. Texas
16. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. University of Minnesota
20. George Washington
20. Univ. of Washington
22. Notre Dame
23. Washington University in St. Louis
24. Emory
24. Washington and Lee
1. Yale
2. Stanford
3. Harvard
4. Columbia
5. Chicago
6. NYU
7. Berkley
7. Penn
7. Virginia
10. Michigan
11. Duke
12. Northwestern
13. Georgetown
14. Cornell
15. UCLA
16. Texas
16. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. University of Minnesota
20. George Washington
20. Univ. of Washington
22. Notre Dame
23. Washington University in St. Louis
24. Emory
24. Washington and Lee
-
- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
top30man wrote:USNWR is driving drunk.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3806
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
splittinghairs wrote:TLS_noobie wrote:Are there new employment numbers associated with these rankings that we haven't seen yet on TLS? I don't know USNWR methodologies (and can't click the link on their page for it because it is broken right now) but does UMinn/UWash/ASU really place better than BU/BC/Fordham? What other factors could possibly be more important than employment placement? My feeble mind is confused....
Simple ASU might have given out a greater percentage of post graduate "fellowships," therefore their employments are better according to USNEWS, its a joke
Their employed after 9 months percentage is much higher than BU, BC, Fordham, etc. in the USNWR data.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: The official rankings release thread
lol at GW (56%) and Emory having below 60% employment rates and being ranked well above Fordham, BU, BC. What the hell are these rankings supposed to measure anyway?
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:42 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Can anyone with a pay account post the data?
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: The official rankings release thread
Blindmelon wrote:lol at GW (56%) and Emory having below 60% employment rates and being ranked well above Fordham, BU, BC. What the hell are these rankings supposed to measure anyway?
Prestige!
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:09 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Yale's 75th LSAT now up to 177.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
stillwater wrote:splittinghairs wrote:TLS_noobie wrote:Are there new employment numbers associated with these rankings that we haven't seen yet on TLS? I don't know USNWR methodologies (and can't click the link on their page for it because it is broken right now) but does UMinn/UWash/ASU really place better than BU/BC/Fordham? What other factors could possibly be more important than employment placement? My feeble mind is confused....
Simple ASU might have given out a greater percentage of post graduate "fellowships," therefore their employments are better according to USNEWS, its a joke
Their employed after 9 months percentage is much higher than BU, BC, Fordham, etc. in the USNWR data.
Employment numbers mean nothing. GW/Emory are at 60% at graduation, and they're 20 and 24. US News measures US News success, not employment prospects.
Last edited by Blindmelon on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Return to “Choosing a Law School�
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests