2013 Rankings

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
Bronck
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Bronck » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:21 am

SBL wrote:
Bronck wrote:
SBL wrote:My law school dropped 6 spots!!!!!!!! I'm doomed!!!!!!!

Is it too late to file a transfer app to ASU as a second-semester 3L?


My suggestion: drop out. like NOW. Then reapply to ASU.

Should I retake? I hear their median went up to 175 and they no longer consider applications from anyone who has never invented an internet.


Retaking is always TCR. Even if you have a 180.

User avatar
Jaeger
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Jaeger » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:22 am

Bronck wrote:
SBL wrote:
Bronck wrote:
SBL wrote:My law school dropped 6 spots!!!!!!!! I'm doomed!!!!!!!

Is it too late to file a transfer app to ASU as a second-semester 3L?


My suggestion: drop out. like NOW. Then reapply to ASU.

Should I retake? I hear their median went up to 175 and they no longer consider applications from anyone who has never invented an internet.


Retaking is always TCR. Even if you have a 180.


Two times is twice as nice. It effectively doubles your chances.
Last edited by Jaeger on Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
R86
Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:03 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby R86 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:22 am

:D
Last edited by R86 on Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bronck
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Bronck » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:23 am

Jaeger wrote:Two times is twice as nice.


Indeed. It shows the school that you're really, really smart. They will be throwing models and bottles in your direction.

User avatar
Jaeger
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Jaeger » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:26 am

Bronck wrote:
Jaeger wrote:Two times is twice as nice.


Indeed. It shows the school that you're really, really smart. They will be throwing models and bottles in your direction.


It's what separates the full tuition kids from the full tuition + stipend kids.

Revolver066
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Revolver066 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:26 am

Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.

de5igual
Posts: 1463
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby de5igual » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:27 am

romothesavior wrote:ENJOYDLAPIPERYOUBIGREDFOOLS


love it.

User avatar
Jaeger
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Jaeger » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:29 am

Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.



You obviously had silly expectations.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby rad lulz » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:30 am

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bronck
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Bronck » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:31 am

rad lulz wrote:
Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.

With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."


Somebody is just jealous that they didn't get in on the fun.

User avatar
Jaeger
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Jaeger » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:31 am

rad lulz wrote:
Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.

With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."


That's DROVES OF POASTS! DROVES I TELL YOU!


Nope, doesn't work for me. You do it.

Revolver066
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Revolver066 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:38 am

rad lulz wrote:
Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.

With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."


Ah, but the "TLS regulars" line wasn't really the jab. I respect the work of many fine TLS regulars, it's just I usually expect them to be funnier (well, maybe not you)

:lol: I kid, I kid, you're great.

User avatar
Jaeger
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Jaeger » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:41 am

Revolver066 wrote:
rad lulz wrote:
Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.

With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."


Ah, but the "TLS regulars" line wasn't really the jab. I respect the work of many fine TLS regulars, it's just I usually expect them to be funnier (well, maybe not you)

:lol: I kid, I kid, you're great.


So instead of them jerking themselves off, you wanted to do it for them?

Revolver066
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Revolver066 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:44 am

:lol: If you can't beat em, join em

User avatar
Jaeger
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Jaeger » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:45 am

Double entendre.

User avatar
Bronck
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Bronck » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:47 am

Jaeger wrote:Double entendre.


LOL

User avatar
stratocophic
Posts: 2207
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby stratocophic » Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:27 am

rad lulz wrote:
romothesavior wrote:
beachbum wrote:
romothesavior wrote:The USNWR rankings and this thread represent what I hate most about law schools and law students.


But if we don't spend 50 pages discussing otherwise meaningless rankings, how are we going to determine which is better between Drake and Gonzaga? The world needs to know!

I just wish I could have transferred before being stained with a non-T20 degree.

I predict employers flee WUSTL in DROVES in favor of ASU
DAMN YOU *sobs*





Lol hold up, carry on breh forgot I already did OCI. Let them eat gooey butter cake

User avatar
Bronck
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Bronck » Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:28 am

stratocophic wrote:

Lol hold up, carry on breh forgot I already did OCI. Let them eat gooey butter cake


Firms are gonna no offer/latham WUSTLers in DROVES bro.

User avatar
omninode
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby omninode » Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:32 am

The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23645
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby chup » Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:35 am

stratocophic wrote:Let them eat gooey butter cake

Underappreciated.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin
Posts: 2468
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby Big Shrimpin » Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:12 am

omninode wrote:The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.


You're doing it wrong, breh.

josh43299
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:29 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby josh43299 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:35 am

Big Shrimpin wrote:
omninode wrote:The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.


You're doing it wrong, breh.


I think any word starts to sounds weird if you say it a lot...

EDIT: I think that my comment was the death rattle of this thread.

tennisking88
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby tennisking88 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:55 am

Richie Tenenbaum wrote:
tennisking88 wrote:
chimp wrote:
tennisking88 wrote:
The only thing holding UT back is its underpaid faculty


Holding it back from what?


Easy, guys, it was a joke http://abovethelaw.com/2011/05/your-tui ... d-at-work/


You do realize that these salaries are low compared to peer private law schools right? They're low compared to even other public schools (compare with michigan: http://data.michigandaily.com/tmdsal?de ... %3E%3D&fte[value]=250%2C000&fte[min]=&fte[max]=&title=&campus=UM_ANN-ARBOR&Year[0]=2011&fname=&lname= ).

Not that I'm saying I think the current situation is a good one, but it's annoying to see UT bashed for high prof salaries when they don't even compare to what law profs at ivies are getting paid.


Just because they don't get paid as much as Ivy professors does not mean they are not grossly overpaid.

User avatar
20130312
Posts: 3842
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby 20130312 » Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:19 am

Wow, this thread finally made it to page 2.

User avatar
romothesavior
Posts: 14772
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: 2013 Rankings

Postby romothesavior » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:12 pm

chup wrote:
stratocophic wrote:Let them eat gooey butter cake

Underappreciated.

Mmm.... do want.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: KPUSN07 and 5 guests