Retaking is always TCR. Even if you have a 180.SBL wrote:Should I retake? I hear their median went up to 175 and they no longer consider applications from anyone who has never invented an internet.Bronck wrote:My suggestion: drop out. like NOW. Then reapply to ASU.SBL wrote:My law school dropped 6 spots!!!!!!!! I'm doomed!!!!!!!
Is it too late to file a transfer app to ASU as a second-semester 3L?
2013 Rankings Forum
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Two times is twice as nice. It effectively doubles your chances.Bronck wrote:Retaking is always TCR. Even if you have a 180.SBL wrote:Should I retake? I hear their median went up to 175 and they no longer consider applications from anyone who has never invented an internet.Bronck wrote:My suggestion: drop out. like NOW. Then reapply to ASU.SBL wrote:My law school dropped 6 spots!!!!!!!! I'm doomed!!!!!!!
Is it too late to file a transfer app to ASU as a second-semester 3L?
Last edited by Jaeger on Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
- R86
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Last edited by R86 on Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Indeed. It shows the school that you're really, really smart. They will be throwing models and bottles in your direction.Jaeger wrote: Two times is twice as nice.
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
It's what separates the full tuition kids from the full tuition + stipend kids.Bronck wrote:Indeed. It shows the school that you're really, really smart. They will be throwing models and bottles in your direction.Jaeger wrote: Two times is twice as nice.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
love it.romothesavior wrote:ENJOYDLAPIPERYOUBIGREDFOOLS
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
You obviously had silly expectations.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Somebody is just jealous that they didn't get in on the fun.rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
That's DROVES OF POASTS! DROVES I TELL YOU!rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
Nope, doesn't work for me. You do it.
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Ah, but the "TLS regulars" line wasn't really the jab. I respect the work of many fine TLS regulars, it's just I usually expect them to be funnier (well, maybe not you)rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
I kid, I kid, you're great.
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
So instead of them jerking themselves off, you wanted to do it for them?Revolver066 wrote:Ah, but the "TLS regulars" line wasn't really the jab. I respect the work of many fine TLS regulars, it's just I usually expect them to be funnier (well, maybe not you)rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
I kid, I kid, you're great.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
If you can't beat em, join em
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
LOLJaeger wrote:Double entendre.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
DAMN YOU *sobs*rad lulz wrote:I predict employers flee WUSTL in DROVES in favor of ASUromothesavior wrote:I just wish I could have transferred before being stained with a non-T20 degree.beachbum wrote:But if we don't spend 50 pages discussing otherwise meaningless rankings, how are we going to determine which is better between Drake and Gonzaga? The world needs to know!romothesavior wrote:The USNWR rankings and this thread represent what I hate most about law schools and law students.
Lol hold up, carry on breh forgot I already did OCI. Let them eat gooey butter cake
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Firms are gonna no offer/latham WUSTLers in DROVES bro.stratocophic wrote:
Lol hold up, carry on breh forgot I already did OCI. Let them eat gooey butter cake
- omninode
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.
- chup
- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Underappreciated.stratocophic wrote:Let them eat gooey butter cake
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
You're doing it wrong, breh.omninode wrote:The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:29 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
I think any word starts to sounds weird if you say it a lot...Big Shrimpin wrote:You're doing it wrong, breh.omninode wrote:The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.
EDIT: I think that my comment was the death rattle of this thread.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Just because they don't get paid as much as Ivy professors does not mean they are not grossly overpaid.Richie Tenenbaum wrote:You do realize that these salaries are low compared to peer private law schools right? They're low compared to even other public schools (compare with michigan: http://data.michigandaily.com/tmdsal?de ... me=&lname= ).tennisking88 wrote:Easy, guys, it was a joke http://abovethelaw.com/2011/05/your-tui ... d-at-work/chimp wrote:Holding it back from what?tennisking88 wrote:
The only thing holding UT back is its underpaid faculty
Not that I'm saying I think the current situation is a good one, but it's annoying to see UT bashed for high prof salaries when they don't even compare to what law profs at ivies are getting paid.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Wow, this thread finally made it to page 2.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Mmm.... do want.aschup wrote:Underappreciated.stratocophic wrote:Let them eat gooey butter cake
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login