2013 Rankings Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
stillwater

Gold
Posts: 3804
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by stillwater » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:48 pm

I also have premium access and it seems like they did absolutely nothing to remedy the egregious self-reporting of employed at 9 months statistics. And some of the stranger schools in the top 30-40 all have numbers that seem way overcooked next to the others (not that any of these are particularly honest).
Last edited by stillwater on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rad lulz

Platinum
Posts: 9807
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Post by rad lulz » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:48 pm

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
180asBreath

Bronze
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by 180asBreath » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:48 pm

YCrevolution wrote:I have premium access to USNWR for those interested in how particular schools fared.
Could you do the numbers on the T6, please?

in2win

Bronze
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:40 am

Re: The official rankings release thread

Post by in2win » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:48 pm

does anyone know if the rankings being released effects the rate at which schools send out decisions

RodneyBoonfield

Bronze
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:54 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by RodneyBoonfield » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:49 pm

W&L? Emory? WUSTL?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
ilovesf

Diamond
Posts: 12837
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by ilovesf » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:49 pm

Cornell only has a 3.63 median? Was it higher before this year?

Excellent117

Bronze
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:44 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by Excellent117 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:49 pm

180asBreath wrote:
YCrevolution wrote:I have premium access to USNWR for those interested in how particular schools fared.
Could you do the numbers on the T6, please?
#1 Yale: 170-177 LSAT, 3.83-3.96 GPA -- 173 and 3.9 medians -- 91.8% employed after 9 months

#2 Stanford: 167-172 LSAT, 3.72-3.93 GPA -- 170 and 3.85 medians -- 97.1% employed after 9 months

#3 Harvard: 171-176 LSAT, 3.78-3.97 GPA -- 173 and 3.89 medians -- 94.6% employed after 9 months

#4 Columbia: 170-175 LSAT, 3.6-3.82 GPA -- 172 and 3.72 medians -- 96.5% employed after 9 months

#5 Chicago: 167-173 LSAT, 3.71-3.94 GPA -- 171 and 3.87 medians -- 97.9% employed after 9 months

#6 NYU: 170-174 LSAT, 3.57-3.85 GPA -- 172 and 3.71 medians -- 96.6% employed after 9 months

User avatar
Ford Prefect

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:30 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Post by Ford Prefect » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:49 pm

I feel good about the rankings. I don't care if they matter.

071816

Platinum
Posts: 5507
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by 071816 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:49 pm

rad lulz wrote:
danquayle wrote:U Wash higher than WUSTL isn't really that crazy. The midwest legal market is both saturated and still suffering from the recession, while U Washington has home school advantage in a city with one of the strongest economies in the country. I mean who is UW really competing with outside of the California schools and the occassionally T14 drifter?
US News doesn't really measure any of that stuff anything in a meaningful way.
This seems to be closer to the truth. Quite the racket they have going.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


rad lulz

Platinum
Posts: 9807
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by rad lulz » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:49 pm

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:50 pm

Gee dubya info plz n thx.

Applying_Late

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:00 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by Applying_Late » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:50 pm

Hahahaha!!!!! Yes!! Harvard falls to Stanford. Burn!

User avatar
stillwater

Gold
Posts: 3804
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by stillwater » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:50 pm

.
Last edited by stillwater on Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
presh

Platinum
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:00 am

Re: The official rankings release thread

Post by presh » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:50 pm

.
Last edited by presh on Sun Dec 27, 2015 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ph14

Gold
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by ph14 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:51 pm

Applying_Late wrote:Hahahaha!!!!! Yes!! Harvard falls to Stanford. Burn!
:lol:

User avatar
reformed calvinist

Bronze
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:58 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Post by reformed calvinist » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:51 pm

Hot damn! I had a feeling WUSTL was going to fall (no offense to WUSTLers, almost went there myself), but I didn't expect Minnesota to climb back up to the #19 spot. I mean, I don't really give a fuck either way, I was just hoping for something more interesting. I was expecting/hoping for GW to climb up one. If GULC can move up one, and W&L, I assume it's not D.C. itself relative to other markets, but who knows.
Last edited by reformed calvinist on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rad lulz

Platinum
Posts: 9807
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The official rankings release thread

Post by rad lulz » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:51 pm

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
skers

Platinum
Posts: 5230
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by skers » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:51 pm

Applying_Late wrote:Hahahaha!!!!! Yes!! Harvard falls to Stanford. Burn!
Dat diluted faculty.

User avatar
mavsman88

New
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:05 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by mavsman88 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:52 pm

Villanoooooooooooooooooooo

User avatar
Dany

Diamond
Posts: 11559
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by Dany » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:52 pm

TemporarySaint wrote:
Applying_Late wrote:Hahahaha!!!!! Yes!! Harvard falls to Stanford. Burn!
Dat diluted faculty.
TemporaryMort

ryemanhattan

Bronze
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by ryemanhattan » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:52 pm

poor cold, 53k/ year Cornell :(

California budget crisis fallout: UCLA and Berkeley are now the most expensive law schools in the country (OOS) at over 54k/ year.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


splittinghairs

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by splittinghairs » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:52 pm

Excellent117 wrote:
180asBreath wrote:
YCrevolution wrote:I have premium access to USNWR for those interested in how particular schools fared.
Could you do the numbers on the T6, please?
#1 Yale: 170-177 LSAT, 3.83-3.96 GPA -- 173 and 3.9 medians -- 91.8% employed after 9 months

#2 Stanford: 167-172 LSAT, 3.72-3.93 GPA -- 170 and 3.85 medians -- 97.1% employed after 9 months

#3 Harvard: 171-176 LSAT, 3.78-3.97 GPA -- 173 and 3.89 medians -- 94.6% employed after 9 months

#4 Columbia: 170-175 LSAT, 3.6-3.82 GPA -- 172 and 3.72 medians -- 96.5% employed after 9 months

#5 Chicago: 167-173 LSAT, 3.71-3.94 GPA -- 171 and 3.87 medians -- 97.9% employed after 9 months

#6 NYU: 170-174 LSAT, 3.57-3.85 GPA -- 172 and 3.71 medians -- 96.6% employed after 9 months
Harvard's numbers are really impressive, they got killed in the 9 month employment, looks like they didnt offer enough paid fellowships.

User avatar
AmandaPB

Bronze
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by AmandaPB » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:52 pm

ph14 wrote:
Applying_Late wrote:Hahahaha!!!!! Yes!! Harvard falls to Stanford. Burn!
:lol:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:53 pm

stillwater wrote:GW

161-168 3.43-3.9 94.3% employed at 9 months
Ty, brother.

freestallion

Silver
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:17 pm

Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings

Post by freestallion » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:53 pm

Wow about Stanford > Harvard now :shock:

And how is it that only 91.8% are employed at Yale? Surprising...
Last edited by freestallion on Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”