Regional v. Top Schools

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
IAFG
Posts: 6665
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: Regional v. Top Schools

Postby IAFG » Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:33 pm

JPrezy87 wrote:
IAFG wrote:
Gail wrote:I'm getting the picture that law school is not at all a way to relocate across the country. Firms like kids who grew up near their city.

Some markets care more than others. IME, Seattle was brutal, other markets were more open-minded.



so what you're saying is...the less competition there is in a local market, the less likely firm recruiters are to give out of staters the evil eye?

I mean... I guess, but I don't think there's a Shangri-La of legal recruiting anywhere right now. I f I had to guess, I would say it probably has more to do with how accustomed they were to taking non-locals in boom times. Seattle was always pretty insular.

User avatar
Veyron
Posts: 3598
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am

Re: Regional v. Top Schools

Postby Veyron » Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:41 pm

I don't think there's a Shangri-La of legal recruiting anywhere right now.


Oh yes there is ... Texas.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests