169 actually.Michigan has a 167 LSAT median instead of 168? OH the HUMANITY!
NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships Forum
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:47 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
and HYS will have 100% yield rates!whymeohgodno wrote:But then schools will have a harder time raising/maintaining medians.Desert Fox wrote:Yea that's pretty much my point.overunderachiever wrote:If we totally got rid of scholarships, then that could happen!How about just charging a lesser tuition rate.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Actually I'm not even sure it would impact their medians much. That ten percent of Michigan who could go to Uchi but don't for money, would go to Uchi. And then the bottom ten % of admits at Uchi would just go to Michigan because they couldn't get Uchi anymore.whymeohgodno wrote:169 actually.Michigan has a 167 LSAT median instead of 168? OH the HUMANITY!
- mpj_3050
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:59 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Arkansas-Fayetteville gives out a shit ton of scholarships every year with a top 20% stipulation. But at least tuition is 11k, the area is cheap, and they tell you up front it requires top 20% or you lose it.
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
GPA/LSAT medians dont mean shit. Schools just obsess over them because of the US News rankingswhymeohgodno wrote:But then schools will have a harder time raising/maintaining medians.Desert Fox wrote:Yea that's pretty much my point.overunderachiever wrote:If we totally got rid of scholarships, then that could happen!How about just charging a lesser tuition rate.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Schools would still obsess over them even without USN&WR.dr123 wrote:GPA/LSAT medians dont mean shit. Schools just obsess over them because of the US News rankingswhymeohgodno wrote:But then schools will have a harder time raising/maintaining medians.Desert Fox wrote:Yea that's pretty much my point.overunderachiever wrote:
If we totally got rid of scholarships, then that could happen!
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
I think the solution to the lawl school problem is:
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota system
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota system
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Or the ABA, instead of resting on its laurels, could enforce the dissemination of "basic consumer information" that is accurate and transparent.gwuorbust wrote:I think the solution to the lawl school problem is:
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota system
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Just do T-14 bro.
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
I do not think that data transparency alone will get rid of the TTTT lawl schools. all those schools care about is filling their class. so if there was a sudden drop off caused by info dissemination, I could easily see Cooley, GGU, et. al. advertising on night TV shows getting people to take the LSAT and then enroll. for-profit and sketch technical schools do this all the time. but to believe that the GGUs of this world will go away without a fight is simply naive thinking.scammedhard wrote:Or the ABA, instead of resting on its laurels, could enforce the dissemination of "basic consumer information" that is accurate and transparent.gwuorbust wrote:I think the solution to the lawl school problem is:
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota system
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
I already see T1/T2 schools advertising their law programs on public transit.gwuorbust wrote:I do not think that data transparency alone will get rid of the TTTT lawl schools. all those schools care about is filling their class. so if there was a sudden drop off caused by info dissemination, I could easily see Cooley, GGU, et. al. advertising on night TV shows getting people to take the LSAT and then enroll. for-profit and sketch technical schools do this all the time. but to believe that the GGUs of this world will go away without a fight is simply naive thinking.
- Lawlcat
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:33 am
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
gwuorbust wrote:I think the solution to the lawl school problem is:
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota system
I am disturbed by the pejorative use of "lawl".scammedhard wrote:I do not think that data transparency alone will get rid of the TTTT lawl schools. all those schools care about is filling their class. so if there was a sudden drop off caused by info dissemination, I could easily see Cooley, GGU, et. al. advertising on night TV shows getting people to take the LSAT and then enroll. for-profit and sketch technical schools do this all the time. but to believe that the GGUs of this world will go away without a fight is simply naive thinking.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Except if there are easily accessible terrible statistics out there, I don't give a rat's ass what stupid people do with their money.gwuorbust wrote:I do not think that data transparency alone will get rid of the TTTT lawl schools. all those schools care about is filling their class. so if there was a sudden drop off caused by info dissemination, I could easily see Cooley, GGU, et. al. advertising on night TV shows getting people to take the LSAT and then enroll. for-profit and sketch technical schools do this all the time. but to believe that the GGUs of this world will go away without a fight is simply naive thinking.scammedhard wrote:Or the ABA, instead of resting on its laurels, could enforce the dissemination of "basic consumer information" that is accurate and transparent.gwuorbust wrote:I think the solution to the lawl school problem is:
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota system
Oh yeah, also reform federal lending.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
welcome to TLSLawlcat wrote:gwuorbust wrote:I think the solution to the lawl school problem is:
1. get rid of USNWR; AND/OR
2. eliminate merit aid; AND/OR
3. shut down bottom 50 schools OR Quota systemI am disturbed by the pejorative use of "lawl".scammedhard wrote:I do not think that data transparency alone will get rid of the TTTT lawl schools. all those schools care about is filling their class. so if there was a sudden drop off caused by info dissemination, I could easily see Cooley, GGU, et. al. advertising on night TV shows getting people to take the LSAT and then enroll. for-profit and sketch technical schools do this all the time. but to believe that the GGUs of this world will go away without a fight is simply naive thinking.
-
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
This is the response i was given when I sent an email to Loyola LA asking specific questions about retaining merit scholarships:
Dear Mr. X:
All of our scholarships have the same renewal criteria. I don't have any solid data on what percentage of the scholarship recipients renew their scholarship under this criteria because this is the first year we have used the top 30% as a criteria. I estimated based on previous data that about 40% of scholarship recipients will renew their scholarships. I also estimate that we will have somewhere around a 130 to 140 recipients.
If you do not renew after your first year the scholarship is lost for the remaining two years. We do have other privately donated scholarships that you could qualify for, but they are in small amounts and are fairly competitive.
Our 1L sections are divided evenly based on academic factors (primarily LSAT and GPA). In addition, we divide them out evenly based on gender and diversity.
I think I answered your questions, but if you have others please feel free to contact me.
*Also, don't forgot about our scholarship reception on April 14 at the City Club in downtown LA and the preview day on April 15 here on campus.
Thanks,
John Hoyt
Dean for Enrollment Management
Dear Mr. X:
All of our scholarships have the same renewal criteria. I don't have any solid data on what percentage of the scholarship recipients renew their scholarship under this criteria because this is the first year we have used the top 30% as a criteria. I estimated based on previous data that about 40% of scholarship recipients will renew their scholarships. I also estimate that we will have somewhere around a 130 to 140 recipients.
If you do not renew after your first year the scholarship is lost for the remaining two years. We do have other privately donated scholarships that you could qualify for, but they are in small amounts and are fairly competitive.
Our 1L sections are divided evenly based on academic factors (primarily LSAT and GPA). In addition, we divide them out evenly based on gender and diversity.
I think I answered your questions, but if you have others please feel free to contact me.
*Also, don't forgot about our scholarship reception on April 14 at the City Club in downtown LA and the preview day on April 15 here on campus.
Thanks,
John Hoyt
Dean for Enrollment Management
- Hannibal
- Posts: 2211
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:00 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
That's a surprisingly open answer I think.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Agree. So much honesty coming from a law school dean is very suspicious. Maybe there is some fine print...Hannibal wrote:That's a surprisingly open answer I think.
Last edited by scammedhard on Sun May 01, 2011 12:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
+1, that was fantastic. And honestly, I think there's a lot of truth to Robert Morse's "read the fine print" line in the article. Part of me feels bad for the kids who lose their scholarship and get hit with a ton of debt from a (likely) weak school in a terrible economy; the other half of me realizes that research is a big part of being a lawyer, and if these kids can't be bothered to investigate their scholarship/financial situation (let alone the job market), then they can deal with the consequences. It seriously amazes me how ignorant many 0Ls are about just what it is they're getting into.Hannibal wrote:That's a surprisingly open answer I think.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Top third is fucking rough.
:::Goes to school on full w/ top 30%
:::Gets top 10% in 5 classes
:::Misses equal protection claim and gets a B-
:::Poverty
:::Goes to school on full w/ top 30%
:::Gets top 10% in 5 classes
:::Misses equal protection claim and gets a B-
:::Poverty
- rocon7383
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:02 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
i actually have a specific question. Cardozo's scholarship is retainable by keeping a 2.950, which they say is "roughly top 80% of the class".... This doesn't seem right. Are they being misleading? or generous to prevent intense competition?
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
not all schools medians are at 3.0. a lot have 3.3 or 3.4 median. you should probably look into that.rocon7383 wrote:i actually have a specific question. Cardozo's scholarship is retainable by keeping a 2.950, which they say is "roughly top 80% of the class".... This doesn't seem right. Are they being misleading? or generous to prevent intense competition?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rocon7383
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:02 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
Well the median is about 3.15 last I checked, so i know the numbers make sense to me. Its just that it seems oddly generous of them. I guess the predatory nature of a lot of other offers i have gotten has made me skeptical of their offer.gwuorbust wrote:not all schools medians are at 3.0. a lot have 3.3 or 3.4 median. you should probably look into that.rocon7383 wrote:i actually have a specific question. Cardozo's scholarship is retainable by keeping a 2.950, which they say is "roughly top 80% of the class".... This doesn't seem right. Are they being misleading? or generous to prevent intense competition?
- glitched
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
yeah i read this today too. interesting article.
i thought this comment was interesting:
"I actually went to Chicago-Kent several years ago. I was awarded a full merit scholarship with the provision that I maintain a 3.0 to keep the scholarship. The school divided the 1L's into three sections - A, B and C. I was in section A. I noticed over the course of the first month and a half of law school that there seemed to be many more people in section A who were the recipients of merit scholarships than in sections B and C. I clearly remember telling some classmates that it seemed to me that the school had a financial incentive to group more merit scholarship recipients together. Because of the grading curve (which was based on your section), some people were certainly going to lose their scholarship money. They thought I was too cynical, but I thought it seemed like a tactic that could really help the school's bottom line." Giddified Washington, D.C. April 30th, 2011 8:36 pm
if that's true, daayyaamm - there are some smartcriminals deans out there.
and wait... T13 is still safe right?
i thought this comment was interesting:
"I actually went to Chicago-Kent several years ago. I was awarded a full merit scholarship with the provision that I maintain a 3.0 to keep the scholarship. The school divided the 1L's into three sections - A, B and C. I was in section A. I noticed over the course of the first month and a half of law school that there seemed to be many more people in section A who were the recipients of merit scholarships than in sections B and C. I clearly remember telling some classmates that it seemed to me that the school had a financial incentive to group more merit scholarship recipients together. Because of the grading curve (which was based on your section), some people were certainly going to lose their scholarship money. They thought I was too cynical, but I thought it seemed like a tactic that could really help the school's bottom line." Giddified Washington, D.C. April 30th, 2011 8:36 pm
if that's true, daayyaamm - there are some smart
and wait... T13 is still safe right?
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:48 am
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
That's pretty communist, bro. And people with cush jobs waiting for them at their family's firm do not take out loans.overunderachiever wrote:If virtually everyone is in the same need for tuition than there would be no need-based aid at all. While it may be true that many graduates will come out with significant debt, I think more money should go to those who will have the most trouble paying off that debt and not to those graduates who will work for daddy's firm.Patriot1208 wrote:No it's not. This isn't undergrad, virtually everyone is in the same need for tuition. Very few of those going to law school can afford it without significant debt. This is why graduate programs focus on merit basedoverunderachiever wrote:As the article pointed out, its a damn shame that need-based aid dropped while merit scholarships skyrocketed...just another case of the have's vs. the have-not's
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: NYTimes Article About Law School Scholarships
There are reasons to doubt claims like this. You tend to know people in your section better, and you find out gossip like who is on scholarship.glitched wrote:yeah i read this today too. interesting article.
i thought this comment was interesting:
"I actually went to Chicago-Kent several years ago. I was awarded a full merit scholarship with the provision that I maintain a 3.0 to keep the scholarship. The school divided the 1L's into three sections - A, B and C. I was in section A. I noticed over the course of the first month and a half of law school that there seemed to be many more people in section A who were the recipients of merit scholarships than in sections B and C. I clearly remember telling some classmates that it seemed to me that the school had a financial incentive to group more merit scholarship recipients together. Because of the grading curve (which was based on your section), some people were certainly going to lose their scholarship money. They thought I was too cynical, but I thought it seemed like a tactic that could really help the school's bottom line." Giddified Washington, D.C. April 30th, 2011 8:36 pm
if that's true, daayyaamm - there are some smartcriminalsdeans out there.
and wait... T13 is still safe right?
And it probably doesn't even make sense to section stack. Since merit scholarships are given for just be slightly higher in GPA/LSAT there isn't a significant difference in quality of student. If there isn't a signicant difference in student quality, it doesn't matter if you put them in the same section or not.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login