Big Law

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Slevin Kelevra 2011
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:55 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby Slevin Kelevra 2011 » Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:34 pm

AMLaw100 + V100 = Biglaw.


NLJ250 is probably the closest published list to this and not a bad definition, but it does include firms that aren't AMLaw100 or V100 which could be considered Midlaw (Brown Rudnick, Foley Hoag, Akerman Sentertift, Arent Fox, etc.).

User avatar
buckilaw
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:27 am

Re: Big Law

Postby buckilaw » Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:20 pm

Can you expect to stay in biglaw longer in a secondary market than you would in NYC? All biglaw firms have the leveraged up and out model; but, I can't help thinking your associate position would be more secure in Cleveland or Chicago than NYC.

Slevin Kelevra 2011
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:55 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby Slevin Kelevra 2011 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:42 pm

buckilaw wrote:Can you expect to stay in biglaw longer in a secondary market than you would in NYC? All biglaw firms have the leveraged up and out model; but, I can't help thinking your associate position would be more secure in Cleveland or Chicago than NYC.


The difference is you can go from NYC biglaw to secondary market biglaw, but you are going to have issues going from secondary market biglaw to anywhere but midlaw/gov/inhouse.

lilklolaka
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:18 am

Re: Big Law

Postby lilklolaka » Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:24 am

the biglaw life - good and bad - can be found all over the place - there are openings all across the country (http://www.gobiglaw.com) - you really have to figure out where you are comfortable living. some cities have high salaries and cost of living is low.

User avatar
unc0mm0n1
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:06 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby unc0mm0n1 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:13 pm

Desert Fox wrote:1) You idiots should stop using linear cost of living calculators. They are not accurate at higher levels of income, especially for somene living alone, and with significant debt. 40K in chicago might equal 75K. But 80K doesn't equal 150K.

No a person with a 160K big law salary doesn't have the same QOL than a partner in NYC (300K) has.

2) When people talk about big law they mean firms that pay a lot (depends on the market), and has a lot of associates (again relative to the market). A lot of people also lump in boutiques.


What is wrong with you?

User avatar
thecilent
Posts: 2506
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby thecilent » Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:53 pm

unc0mm0n1 wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:1) You idiots should stop using linear cost of living calculators. They are not accurate at higher levels of income, especially for somene living alone, and with significant debt. 40K in chicago might equal 75K. But 80K doesn't equal 150K.

No a person with a 160K big law salary doesn't have the same QOL than a partner in NYC (300K) has.

2) When people talk about big law they mean firms that pay a lot (depends on the market), and has a lot of associates (again relative to the market). A lot of people also lump in boutiques.


What is wrong with you?

? wtf is wrong with what he wrote?

User avatar
Ikki
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:37 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby Ikki » Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:43 pm

I thought biglaw = doing transactional work for $160,000 a year.

User avatar
unc0mm0n1
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:06 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby unc0mm0n1 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:59 pm

thecilent wrote:
unc0mm0n1 wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:1) You idiots should stop using linear cost of living calculators. They are not accurate at higher levels of income, especially for somene living alone, and with significant debt. 40K in chicago might equal 75K. But 80K doesn't equal 150K.

No a person with a 160K big law salary doesn't have the same QOL than a partner in NYC (300K) has.

2) When people talk about big law they mean firms that pay a lot (depends on the market), and has a lot of associates (again relative to the market). A lot of people also lump in boutiques.


What is wrong with you?

? wtf is wrong with what he wrote?


I was referring to the fact he constantly calls people idiots or some other derogatory name in almost all of his posts. He seems to all ways degrade people no matter what they ask or how they ask it. That answer would have been reasonable sans the name calling.

HeavenWood
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby HeavenWood » Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:00 pm

unc0mm0n1 wrote:
thecilent wrote:
unc0mm0n1 wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:1) You idiots should stop using linear cost of living calculators. They are not accurate at higher levels of income, especially for somene living alone, and with significant debt. 40K in chicago might equal 75K. But 80K doesn't equal 150K.

No a person with a 160K big law salary doesn't have the same QOL than a partner in NYC (300K) has.

2) When people talk about big law they mean firms that pay a lot (depends on the market), and has a lot of associates (again relative to the market). A lot of people also lump in boutiques.


What is wrong with you?

? wtf is wrong with what he wrote?


I was referring to the fact he constantly calls people idiots or some other derogatory name in almost all of his posts. He seems to all ways degrade people no matter what they ask or how they ask it. That answer would have been reasonable sans the name calling.


Welcome to TLS!

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Big Law

Postby Patriot1208 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:04 pm

HeavenWood wrote:
unc0mm0n1 wrote:
thecilent wrote:
unc0mm0n1 wrote:What is wrong with you?

? wtf is wrong with what he wrote?


I was referring to the fact he constantly calls people idiots or some other derogatory name in almost all of his posts. He seems to all ways degrade people no matter what they ask or how they ask it. That answer would have been reasonable sans the name calling.


Welcome to TLS the internet!

HeavenWood
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby HeavenWood » Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:05 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:Welcome to TLS the internet! life?

User avatar
unc0mm0n1
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:06 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby unc0mm0n1 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:09 pm

HeavenWood wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:Welcome to TLS the internet! life?


seriously? I put money if he saw any of these people in real life he'd never say half the stuff he says. It seems the toughest people on the internet are the exact opposite in real life.

HeavenWood
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: Big Law

Postby HeavenWood » Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:10 pm

unc0mm0n1 wrote:
HeavenWood wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:Welcome to TLS the internet! life?


seriously? I put money if he saw any of these people in real life he'd never say half the stuff he says. It seems the toughest people on the internet are the exact opposite in real life.


I was being facetious. :wink:

Even so, there is by no means a shortage of assholes in the real world.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Big Law

Postby Patriot1208 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:20 pm

unc0mm0n1 wrote:
HeavenWood wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:Welcome to TLS the internet! life?


seriously? I put money if he saw any of these people in real life he'd never say half the stuff he says. It seems the toughest people on the internet are the exact opposite in real life.

Another internet tough guy accusation, I love these. And actually think df is the same irl.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], cavalier1138, jeffcooon and 5 guests