Redsgomarchingon wrote:I based the 6% on the most recent data: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL ... hbxlogin=1
But yes, looking at past years, USC and UCLA have traded spots quite often and it's probably not reasonable to assume UCLA would place 6% higher in Biglaw for a second year in a row
They actually haven't traded NLJ250 spots for the few years prior to 2010. USC has been a decent amount ahead of UCLA from 2006 through 2009. Though UCLA held the top spot in 2005.
That being said, they are peers, I'm just being anal about the data.