Columbia v. Harvard

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
logistikon
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Columbia v. Harvard

Postby logistikon » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:52 am

The question is not which one to attend (I'm sure that almost everyone will say harvard); the question is rather what advantages harvard actually has on columbia (other than a slight rankings edge). Is there really a reason other than pure prestige to pick harvard over columbia?

User avatar
ResolutePear
Posts: 8614
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby ResolutePear » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:54 am

logistikon wrote:The question is not which one to attend (I'm sure that almost everyone will say harvard); the question is rather what advantages harvard actually has on columbia (other than a slight rankings edge). Is there really a reason other than pure prestige to pick harvard over columbia?


Walk into a "bodega" or any other grocery store. Ask the cashier this question. *THAT* is your answer.

TheFactor
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:12 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby TheFactor » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:58 am

Harvard is a guaranteed panty-dropper.

logistikon
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby logistikon » Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:39 am

ResolutePear wrote:
logistikon wrote:The question is not which one to attend (I'm sure that almost everyone will say harvard); the question is rather what advantages harvard actually has on columbia (other than a slight rankings edge). Is there really a reason other than pure prestige to pick harvard over columbia?


Walk into a "bodega" or any other grocery store. Ask the cashier this question. *THAT* is your answer.


I hope that if I attend either of these schools, the opinions of bodega cashiers will not matter to my ego or job prospects.

User avatar
2things2
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:39 am

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby 2things2 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:59 am

TheFactor wrote:Harvard is a guaranteed panty-dropper.

DeepSeaLaw
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:48 am

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby DeepSeaLaw » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:19 am

At HLS you don't need to rank quite as highly in your class to secure competitive positions. Many employers -- from firms to judges -- hire "deeper" into the class at Harvard; this is more dramatic when you get outside of New York, where CLS is obviously very strong.
Additionally, the grading system means that small differences in 1L grades (B vs B+, A vs A-, etc.) won't matter quite as much when it comes to hiring.

Harvard, along with Yale, also owns the federal government, and places many more alumni into academia. The difference really is just prestige, but it's professional prestige, not lay prestige. If we're talking Biglaw firms in NYC, there probably isn't much of a difference, although the HLS grad might get slightly more latitude on grades. But if we're talking federal clerkships, government Honors programs, or other uber-competitive positions, the gap begins to matter more.

User avatar
gdane
Posts: 12415
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby gdane » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:24 am

Enjoy Harvard.

Bumi
Posts: 947
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby Bumi » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:32 am

ResolutePear wrote:Walk into a "bodega" law school or any other grocery store academic institution. Ask the cashier a professor this question. *THAT* is your answer.

User avatar
ResolutePear
Posts: 8614
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby ResolutePear » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:44 am

logistikon wrote:
ResolutePear wrote:
logistikon wrote:The question is not which one to attend (I'm sure that almost everyone will say harvard); the question is rather what advantages harvard actually has on columbia (other than a slight rankings edge). Is there really a reason other than pure prestige to pick harvard over columbia?


Walk into a "bodega" or any other grocery store. Ask the cashier this question. *THAT* is your answer.


I hope that if I attend either of these schools, the opinions of bodega cashiers will not matter to my ego or job prospects.


My point in saying that is simple:

A bodega cashier has the depth of common knowledge required to give an obvious answer to this question. Hell, you already answered the question half-way in the question itself.

User avatar
Attorney
Posts: 332
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:52 am

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby Attorney » Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:51 pm

Harvard is Harvard. It is the pinnacle of all creation.

User avatar
MrPapagiorgio
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby MrPapagiorgio » Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:52 pm

TheFactor wrote:Harvard is a guaranteed panty-dropper.

The only reason we attend lawl school.

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby FuManChusco » Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:52 pm

Attorney wrote:Harvard is Harvard. It is the pinnacle of all creation.


Egregious Yale trolling

User avatar
Lovely Ludwig Van
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby Lovely Ludwig Van » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:12 pm

TheFactor wrote:Harvard is a guaranteed panty-dropper.


Lol. This guy is pretty funny.

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby 09042014 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:25 pm

Better clerkship and academia. For big law they are fairly similar. Harvard has an edge but its not huge.

Go to harvard if you can, but don't be too butthurt if you don't get in.

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby JamMasterJ » Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:32 pm

H. Unless you have a stack of money from Columbia

logistikon
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby logistikon » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:40 pm

thanks for the responses. the motivation behind the thread is as follows - new york seems like it is a much more fun city in which to live, but i'm afraid of taking a hit in job prospects because i wanted to party in nyc for 3 years. i suppose if i choose to do biglaw, i can always make up for lost time in nyc after law school.

sonervous88
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:27 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby sonervous88 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:43 pm

logistikon wrote:thanks for the responses. the motivation behind the thread is as follows - new york seems like it is a much more fun city in which to live, but i'm afraid of taking a hit in job prospects because i wanted to party in nyc for 3 years. i suppose if i choose to do biglaw, i can always make up for lost time in nyc after law school.


as someone who used to live in boston and ives outside of nyc now boston is an awesome city to live in. don't let that be your deciding factor

logistikon
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby logistikon » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:45 pm

sonervous88 wrote:
logistikon wrote:thanks for the responses. the motivation behind the thread is as follows - new york seems like it is a much more fun city in which to live, but i'm afraid of taking a hit in job prospects because i wanted to party in nyc for 3 years. i suppose if i choose to do biglaw, i can always make up for lost time in nyc after law school.


as someone who used to live in boston and ives outside of nyc now boston is an awesome city to live in. don't let that be your deciding factor


i visited new york to check out nyu and columbia and i fell madly in love immediately. i just don't feel the same way about boston...dunno what it is.

sonervous88
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:27 pm

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby sonervous88 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:55 pm

logistikon wrote:
sonervous88 wrote:
logistikon wrote:thanks for the responses. the motivation behind the thread is as follows - new york seems like it is a much more fun city in which to live, but i'm afraid of taking a hit in job prospects because i wanted to party in nyc for 3 years. i suppose if i choose to do biglaw, i can always make up for lost time in nyc after law school.


as someone who used to live in boston and ives outside of nyc now boston is an awesome city to live in. don't let that be your deciding factor


i visited new york to check out nyu and columbia and i fell madly in love immediately. i just don't feel the same way about boston...dunno what it is.


hey to each his own. just be happy! :) you have great choices and i'm jealous. i don't think there is a bad choice. however. if you got into harvard i'd try to seroiusly negotiate some cash from columbia. just to sweeten the deal good luck and congrats

BeautifulSW
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 11:52 am

Re: Columbia v. Harvard

Postby BeautifulSW » Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:29 am

Everyone will say "Harvard" and I suppose that they are right by almost any career measure wherever you want to go and whatever you want to do. I mean, if you can't get into Yale, Harvard is the obvious choice.

Even so...I've worked with a Columbia lawyer or two over the years and I've known more than a few Harvard Law grads. Both groups (tiny samples, really) were breathtakingly smart and well-trained lawyers. Predictably, many were my own professors. But the Harvard people tend to hate their school while Columbia grads tend to revere theirs. Probably doesn't mean anything. Just anecdotes. But it does make one think. Why ARE these people so BITTER?




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests