I try to get in on an argument once in a while......but I don't get all crazy about it or get personal because I think it's ridiculous to be an asshole just because I'm online (female here)rman1201 wrote:Has anyone ever noticed the major gender differences on TLS? Pretty much every argument on here is 100% male, the women are pretty chill.
what's up with this "big law or bust" idea? Forum
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
- NZA
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
FTFYrman1201 wrote:Has anyone ever noticed the major gender differenceson TLSin life? Pretty much every argument on here is 100% male, the women are pretty chill.
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
I would argue against that argument by arguing that I am chill as well. I think men just love casual arguments.rman1201 wrote:Has anyone ever noticed the major gender differences on TLS? Pretty much every argument on here is 100% male, the women are pretty chill.
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
TCR hahaNZA wrote:FTFYrman1201 wrote:Has anyone ever noticed the major gender differenceson TLSin life? Pretty much every argument on here is 100% male, the women are pretty chill.
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
I caught that. What I meant to say is, if I read one more research journal article, my brain's going to turn into pancake batter. Thank you for a short spar to distract me, and I apologize if my arguments start coming apart a little bit.flcath wrote:I was agreeing w/ you, dawg. Your numbers are inflated, but their's are just made up.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
Not a problem, brother.lisjjen wrote:I caught that. What I meant to say is, if I read one more research journal article, my brain's going to turn into pancake batter. Thank you for a short spar to distract me, and I apologize if my arguments start coming apart a little bit.flcath wrote:I was agreeing w/ you, dawg. Your numbers are inflated, but their's are just made up.
Flame on you reading "one more research journal article" though. Everyone knows no one reads those (judges just skim for the main point, and profs just pretend to so that other profs will pretend to read theirs... it's what our tuition goes to).
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
But one trick of the trade is, if you read the whole article, you can cite the sources that they cite without actually having to read them. A good article will actually cut your research time down by 1/4th to 1/3rd.flcath wrote:Flame on you reading "one more research journal article" though. Everyone knows no one reads those (judges just skim for the main point, and profs just pretend to so that other profs will pretend to read theirs... it's what our tuition goes to).
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
You know I have always heard this (particularly in the context of LW, where you've gotta brief a case in an area of law you don't know dick about), but I've always lacked the discipline to actually do it.lisjjen wrote:But one trick of the trade is, if you read the whole article, you can cite the sources that they cite without actually having to read them. A good article will actually cut your research time down by 1/4th to 1/3rd.flcath wrote:Flame on you reading "one more research journal article" though. Everyone knows no one reads those (judges just skim for the main point, and profs just pretend to so that other profs will pretend to read theirs... it's what our tuition goes to).
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
I have written entire research papers this way. It is awesome.flcath wrote:You know I have always heard this (particularly in the context of LW, where you've gotta brief a case in an area of law you don't know dick about), but I've always lacked the discipline to actually do it.lisjjen wrote:But one trick of the trade is, if you read the whole article, you can cite the sources that they cite without actually having to read them. A good article will actually cut your research time down by 1/4th to 1/3rd.flcath wrote:Flame on you reading "one more research journal article" though. Everyone knows no one reads those (judges just skim for the main point, and profs just pretend to so that other profs will pretend to read theirs... it's what our tuition goes to).
- swampthang
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
You're welcome to look for yourself if you still think you're "the Chosen One".rman1201 wrote:Just don't complainLoyalRebel wrote:As ridiculous as the "big law or bust" idea is, I hardly expect anything more from a bunch of future lawyers.
"Run along now, you'll never make it. Leave the law school to me; I'm better than you" is the typical response you'll get when you mention this subject.
I think the truly great people end up being those who aren't phased by having the odds stacked against them.ifwhen things end up in accordance with the odds.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
look coming from someone who can't go big law and had to deal with these same issues, its honestly
just that big law is the big leagues. Its prestigious and rewarding. If this site was about baseball do you think
people would be posting things like "dude what batting average do i need to have to be drafted to the new haven ravens"
No, they would be like "yankees or bust"
I know thats a lame analogy but you have to deal with it. Welcome to law, its a hierarchical profession there will always be
people doing more "prestigious" things than you, and saying that these prestigious things are the "only" way to go. You have to define what you want for yourself in the end and whether or not you can feasibly do it without drowning in debt.
just that big law is the big leagues. Its prestigious and rewarding. If this site was about baseball do you think
people would be posting things like "dude what batting average do i need to have to be drafted to the new haven ravens"
No, they would be like "yankees or bust"
I know thats a lame analogy but you have to deal with it. Welcome to law, its a hierarchical profession there will always be
people doing more "prestigious" things than you, and saying that these prestigious things are the "only" way to go. You have to define what you want for yourself in the end and whether or not you can feasibly do it without drowning in debt.
- swampthang
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
No, that's actually a really fantastic and totally apt analogy. Natural that people would be more concerned with the Red Sox than the Alabama Snowbears. Although it's not just prestige, also $$$ too- same holds with the baseball analogy as the show pays a lot more then A ball.joshlyman wrote:look coming from someone who can't go big law and had to deal with these same issues, its honestly
just that big law is the big leagues. Its prestigious and rewarding. If this site was about baseball do you think
people would be posting things like "dude what batting average do i need to have to be drafted to the new haven ravens"
No, they would be like "yankees or bust"
I know thats a lame analogy but you have to deal with it. Welcome to law, its a hierarchical profession there will always be
people doing more "prestigious" things than you, and saying that these prestigious things are the "only" way to go. You have to define what you want for yourself in the end and whether or not you can feasibly do it without drowning in debt.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
The class of 2009 interviewed in fall 2007 (GOOD TIMES) and were SAs in summer 2008 (BEFORE IMPENDING APOCALYPSE). That's not ITE.lisjjen wrote:The term "ITE" gets abused worse than Rihanna. To be clear, the recession started in December 2007. I cited 2009. It's not like I was citing 2002's numbers.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:32 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
I'm with this.joshlyman wrote:look coming from someone who can't go big law and had to deal with these same issues, its honestly
just that big law is the big leagues. Its prestigious and rewarding. If this site was about baseball do you think
people would be posting things like "dude what batting average do i need to have to be drafted to the new haven ravens"
No, they would be like "yankees or bust"
I know thats a lame analogy but you have to deal with it. Welcome to law, its a hierarchical profession there will always be
people doing more "prestigious" things than you, and saying that these prestigious things are the "only" way to go. You have to define what you want for yourself in the end and whether or not you can feasibly do it without drowning in debt.
"Big Law or Bust" seems to fit two types of people: the ultra ambitious and the ultra indebted. If you are getting a good scholarship to a decent school, you may not need (or want) a big law gig to finance your debt after graduation. Mid-law may be more than enough for your to repay whatever small loans you have and live comfortably. Of course most of us dream of making it big and landing one of those nice $160K jobs right out of law school, but for most people that is not a reality. So unless you are going to a T6, or MAYBE a T14, taking out a shit load of loans knowing that the only way you can pay it back is if you get big law is a bad idea.
If you, like me, are not looking at a T14 offer or a simply debt-averse, go to a strong regional T1 on a scholarship. That way, if you are one of the sorry saps that dont get big law, you wont have to sell your firstborn child to pay off your debt. Plenty of people make a decent living without big law because they are not up to their eyeballs in debt.
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
While this may be fair, you should also realize that most law students are ultra indebted. And most law students do not get big law.cowgirl_bebop wrote:I'm with this.joshlyman wrote:look coming from someone who can't go big law and had to deal with these same issues, its honestly
just that big law is the big leagues. Its prestigious and rewarding. If this site was about baseball do you think
people would be posting things like "dude what batting average do i need to have to be drafted to the new haven ravens"
No, they would be like "yankees or bust"
I know thats a lame analogy but you have to deal with it. Welcome to law, its a hierarchical profession there will always be
people doing more "prestigious" things than you, and saying that these prestigious things are the "only" way to go. You have to define what you want for yourself in the end and whether or not you can feasibly do it without drowning in debt.
"Big Law or Bust" seems to fit two types of people: the ultra ambitious and the ultra indebted. If you are getting a good scholarship to a decent school, you may not need (or want) a big law gig to finance your debt after graduation. Mid-law may be more than enough for your to repay whatever small loans you have and live comfortably. Of course most of us dream of making it big and landing one of those nice $160K jobs right out of law school, but for most people that is not a reality. So unless you are going to a T6, or MAYBE a T14, taking out a shit load of loans knowing that the only way you can pay it back is if you get big law is a bad idea.
If you, like me, are not looking at a T14 offer or a simply debt-averse, go to a strong regional T1 on a scholarship. That way, if you are one of the sorry saps that dont get big law, you wont have to sell your firstborn child to pay off your debt. Plenty of people make a decent living without big law because they are not up to their eyeballs in debt.
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
What about students in at a T10?FiveSermon wrote:While this may be fair, you should also realize that most law students are ultra indebted. And most law students do not get big law.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
nope, only T9lisjjen wrote:What about students in at a T10?FiveSermon wrote:While this may be fair, you should also realize that most law students are ultra indebted. And most law students do not get big law.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
nope, only T8fatduck wrote:nope, only T9lisjjen wrote:What about students in at a T10?FiveSermon wrote:While this may be fair, you should also realize that most law students are ultra indebted. And most law students do not get big law.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
what is this i dont even
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
*Cough* I think you meanith T-7 my esteemed sir.FiveSermon wrote:nope, only T8fatduck wrote:nope, only T9lisjjen wrote:What about students in at a T10?FiveSermon wrote:While this may be fair, you should also realize that most law students are ultra indebted. And most law students do not get big law.
- ahduth
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:55 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
T6 plus Berkeley?Veyron wrote:*Cough* I think you meanith T-7 my esteemed sir.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
ITE Boalt is a Gtown peer.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
Get with the times.Desert Fox wrote:ITEBoaltBerkeley is a Gtown peer.
- ahduth
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:55 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
So T6 basically. Glad we sorted that out. Thanks for playing everyone.flcath wrote:Get with the times.Desert Fox wrote:ITEBoaltBerkeley is a Gtown peer.
- Attorney
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:52 am
Re: what's up with this "big law or bust" idea?
Big Law is extremely overrated... even if you could get that "golden ticket", would you want to work 80 hours a week for some dick you probably don't like at all and who probably doesn't like you either? The chosen few of you are going to have so much fun! Especially the ones with too much debt (T14 @ sticker) to quit your jobs however much you despise your near-lifeless existences.
There's a reason that Big Law has such high attrition. It's not what people think it will be. It's having no time but to work and sleep, as your wife/girlfriend spends your "$160k" and later divorces you after having an affair whilst you are at work from 8 am to 11 pm. She'll get all the assets from income you earned between 8 am and 3:30 pm. The rest is all yours, just as if you worked 40 hours like a regular person. Yay!
When you lack the will to carry on, remember my warning.
A bit of a repost above, I should have posted that here, more on-topic, instead of in a school-specific thread. Glad I saw this enlightening topic!
Last edited by Attorney on Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login