Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
2010trojan
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 12:31 pm

Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby 2010trojan » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:56 am

wikipedia says 1987 was the first year and they skipped a year in 88. is there a compilation of these ranks dating back to that first one?

User avatar
vamedic03
Posts: 1579
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby vamedic03 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:34 am

2010trojan wrote:wikipedia says 1987 was the first year and they skipped a year in 88. is there a compilation of these ranks dating back to that first one?


google.

User avatar
Sentry
Posts: 1235
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:38 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby Sentry » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:43 am

Image

User avatar
2010trojan
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 12:31 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby 2010trojan » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:49 am

Sentry wrote:Image


thanks sentry, appreciate it.

bdubs
Posts: 3729
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby bdubs » Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:24 pm

This makes you realize how crazy the rankings are. Were Columbia and Chicago actually "bettter" than Harvard in 1990, but not in any year before or after?

rundoxierun
Posts: 1893
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby rundoxierun » Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:51 pm

bdubs wrote:This makes you realize how crazy the rankings are. Were Columbia and Chicago actually "bettter" than Harvard in 1990, but not in any year before or after?

They change the formula every once in a while.. The craziest thing is that, under the current formula, its nearly mathematically impossible for any school to pass Yale. They would have to either tremendously cut their class size(Harvard) or raise a ton of money (Stanford) and start spending it on things(not scholarships). Spending per student is the main driving force behind the rankings at the top schools.

UnbelievableForum23
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:57 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby UnbelievableForum23 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:00 pm

what is the website where this is located? I would like to see the T20

tlslsnlsp
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby tlslsnlsp » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:42 pm

interesting to see that it's been 17 years since any of CCN dropped below 6th. those schools really are solidly 4-6, huh?

User avatar
Law Sauce
Posts: 923
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby Law Sauce » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:50 pm

UnbelievableForum23 wrote: I would like to see the T20

seconded


User avatar
NorCalBruin
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:58 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby NorCalBruin » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:35 pm

UCLA was T14... HEYO

User avatar
vamedic03
Posts: 1579
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby vamedic03 » Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:26 am

NorCalBruin wrote:UCLA was T14... HEYO


Not exactly - T14 = the 14 schools that have been ranked, at some point, within the top 10.

User avatar
vertex
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:22 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby vertex » Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:33 am

vamedic03 wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:UCLA was T14... HEYO


Not exactly - T14 = the 14 schools that have been ranked, at some point, within the top 10.


That can't be true since Georgetown doesn't appear to ever have been T10. LG -1, buddy.

rundoxierun
Posts: 1893
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby rundoxierun » Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:36 am

vertex wrote:
vamedic03 wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:UCLA was T14... HEYO


Not exactly - T14 = the 14 schools that have been ranked, at some point, within the top 10.


That can't be true since Georgetown doesn't appear to ever have been T10. LG -1, buddy.


LOL.. check again.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby Bildungsroman » Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:49 am

vertex wrote:
vamedic03 wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:UCLA was T14... HEYO


Not exactly - T14 = the 14 schools that have been ranked, at some point, within the top 10.


That can't be true since Georgetown doesn't appear to ever have been T10. LG -1, buddy.


Wut, I'm pretty sure you just scored a RC -1.

Or LG -1. Who gives a shit, the important thing is that you were wrong.

User avatar
NorCalBruin
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:58 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby NorCalBruin » Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:31 pm

In fairness, it's something of a misnomer if Top 14 means "Been top 10 at least once". That's lame as tits.

User avatar
megaTTTron
Posts: 980
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:26 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby megaTTTron » Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:37 pm

NorCalBruin wrote:In fairness, it's something of a misnomer if Top 14 means "Been top 10 at least once". That's lame as tits.


does not compute.

tlslsnlsp
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby tlslsnlsp » Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:04 pm

if that's the definition of T14 looks like it'll be a while before T14 changes, huh? when do you think UCLA UT or Vanderbilt will head all the way up to 10 hah

Aqualibrium
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am

Re: Is there a compilation of the rankings dating back to 1987?

Postby Aqualibrium » Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:09 pm

megaTTTron wrote:
NorCalBruin wrote:In fairness, it's something of a misnomer if Top 14 means "Been top 10 at least once". That's lame as tits.


does not compute.



THIS




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chipotle85, haus and 3 guests