Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:16 pm

artichoke wrote:
paratactical wrote:
artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings :roll:

I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.

You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.


Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...

para arent you a girl?? I thought I read that somewhere.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:17 pm

sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk

naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).

User avatar
artichoke
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby artichoke » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:17 pm

FuManChusco wrote:
thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.


oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.


Hahaha

User avatar
artichoke
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby artichoke » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:17 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk

naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).


Loooool, I'm sure.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:18 pm

artichoke wrote:
paratactical wrote:
artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings :roll:

I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.

You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.


Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...


Unapologetic about being fat? C'mon, get in the gym, you'll enjoy life a lot more.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby paratactical » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:18 pm

artichoke wrote:
paratactical wrote:
artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings :roll:

I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.

You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.


Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...


Totally unapologetic and alone. Sounds fun.

Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).


Agreed. Several of them are bangable, but they aren't actually attractive in any meaningful way.

User avatar
gov
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby gov » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:18 pm

I feel like this is going to turn into "picture time".

User avatar
glitter178
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby glitter178 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:18 pm

Bildungsroman wrote:I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.


+ 1

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:19 pm

FuManChusco wrote:
thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.


oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.

He is the one that is going to get banged kissed on the cheek

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:19 pm

glitter178 wrote:
Bildungsroman wrote:I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.


+ 1
boring-visit

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:20 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.


oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.

He is the one that is going to get banged kissed on the cheek


this is tcr,that guy will land in the friend zone, fumanchusco will be the target of the attractive girl with daddy issues.

User avatar
thelaststraw05
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby thelaststraw05 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:20 pm

FuManChusco wrote:
thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.


oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.


I'm married, so I don't need it to take me anywhere.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby paratactical » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:20 pm

glitter178 wrote:
Bildungsroman wrote:I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.


+ 1


Go for summer climates and lower LSAT scores. Look for UGs with fratstar populations. Go after Freshman and Soph UG girls, they are easier, more attractive and don't need constant validation that they are special or smart like law school girls.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:21 pm

artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk

naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).


Loooool, I'm sure.

Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?

User avatar
gov
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby gov » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:21 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk

naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).


Loooool, I'm sure.

Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?


I can appreciate high standards.

User avatar
mrmangs
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby mrmangs » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:22 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk

naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).


Loooool, I'm sure.

Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?


But what do high standards mean if you go outside of them?

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:23 pm

sophia.olive wrote:"or maybe people cut you down because you're an arrogant bitch."
:mrgreen: yeah

but honestly if I was a male it would have been
"or maybe people cut you down because you are confident"


and notice we are only talking about the attractivness of females.

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:24 pm

mrmangs wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).


Loooool, I'm sure.

Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?


But what do high standards mean if you go outside of them?


You've never hooked up with someone you consider below your standards? What they mean for me, is what I strive for, I won't go below a certain point, and I won't marry below my high standards.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest