Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way. Forum

StateSchoolSplitter · Post by **StateSchoolSplitter** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:36 am

Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.

r6_philly · Post by **r6_philly** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:03 pm

StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.

Visit?

FuManChusco · Post by **FuManChusco** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:07 pm

lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1

Patriot1208 · Post by **Patriot1208** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:11 pm

FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1

We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

thelaststraw05 · Post by **thelaststraw05** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:19 pm

r6_philly wrote:
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.
Visit?

TITCR.

I think it is fine to choose a school based on the quality of the student body (which is the way this thread is articulated), but it is kinda despicable to ask about the student body if all you are actually interested in finding out is the quality of the students' bodies.

Patriot1208 · Post by **Patriot1208** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:24 pm

thelaststraw05 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.
Visit?
TITCR.

I think it is fine to choose a school based on the quality of the student body (which is the way this thread is articulated), but it is kinda despicable to ask about the student body if all you are actually interested in finding out is the quality of the students' bodies.

Also, if this is your motivation, i'd probably stay away from washu.

thelaststraw05 · Post by **thelaststraw05** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:28 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
thelaststraw05 wrote:I think it is fine to choose a school based on the quality of the student body (which is the way this thread is articulated), but it is kinda despicable to ask about the student body if all you are actually interested in finding out is the quality of the students' bodies.
Also, if this is your motivation, i'd probably stay away from washu.

Given the title of the thread:

StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

I think we kinda have to assume that is the motivation. Particularly given that the list fairly conspicuously includes:

StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc.

sophia.olive · Post by **sophia.olive** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:34 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

This is not true.
I complain about sexism, but speculating about the attractivness of girls at a school is not sexism. males and females are attracted to each other, duh...
Thinking a girl is limited in mental ability because she is attractive is sexism. But that really goes both ways, if I see a guy that has that tan, cali look im going to think he is dumb at first. Also, not allowing girls to speculate about the attractivness of guys at schools, or at least viewing them differently from the guys that do it because of it, is sexest.

on that note- I imagine NYU has the best looking guys based of "the best looking guys at NYU

The girls actually look a little better than the guys.

anyways sorry, I know one girl that went to WUstl and she is about a 7.5. There no you can make a decision

oh... my friend just said he knows a girl that went there and she is fat. maybe a 5 he says.

It is probably preppy mid-western which is better than preppy east or west coast but still slightly annoying.

Patriot1208 · Post by **Patriot1208** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:40 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.
This is not true.
I complain about sexism

I'm not sure what the point of your post was, but all I got out of it was that you are fat and/or ugly.

gov · Post by **gov** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:44 pm

I think its perfectly reasonable to be curious about the composition of the student body. That being said, I don't think its reasonable to base your decision on that...

sophia.olive · Post by **sophia.olive** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:45 pm

I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.

gov · Post by **gov** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm

sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.

I would say 2nd on the bottom row for guys

r6_philly · Post by **r6_philly** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm

Visit?

The day someone can tell me how attractive the student body is in my eyes ... :roll

Bildungsroman · Post by **Bildungsroman** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm

I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.

sophia.olive · Post by **sophia.olive** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:48 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.

artichoke · Post by **artichoke** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:48 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.

FlanAl · Post by **FlanAl** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:48 pm

the slide show on the schools website is probably the best you're going to get for a while. i don't think a lot of wustlers are going to be on here during finals. as far as the slideshow is concerned considering that its just a law school home-page slideshow I'd highly doubt that anything is photoshopped or airbrushed. SO at least what you see is what you get.

Patriot1208 · Post by **Patriot1208** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:50 pm

sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.

ummm, ehhh,

sophia.olive · Post by **sophia.olive** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:50 pm

artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.
Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.

yeah im totally confused, have you ever been around attractive girls?

sophia.olive · Post by **sophia.olive** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:51 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.

ummm, ehhh,

really?..... what about bottom middle?

gov · Post by **gov** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:52 pm

I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.

I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...

krad · Post by **krad** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:52 pm

oh yes, this thread is back.

Patriot1208 · Post by **Patriot1208** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:54 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.

ummm, ehhh,
really?..... what about bottom middle?

In all seriousness, there isn't one girl on that picture you posted who is better than average.

paratactical · Post by **paratactical** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:54 pm

artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.
Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.

Yeah. I can't believe he forgot "uppity bitches".

FuManChusco · Post by **FuManChusco** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:55 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1
We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.
Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.
yeah im totally confused, have you ever been around attractive girls?

you clearly missed the last thread on this topic. if I posted the picture you would understand. however, the thread would be locked.

Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way. Forum

Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Register for access!

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Register now!

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?