para arent you a girl?? I thought I read that somewhere.artichoke wrote:Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...paratactical wrote:You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way. Forum
- sophia.olive
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk
- artichoke
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
HahahaFuManChusco wrote:oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.
- artichoke
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Loooool, I'm sure.Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Unapologetic about being fat? C'mon, get in the gym, you'll enjoy life a lot more.artichoke wrote:Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...paratactical wrote:You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Totally unapologetic and alone. Sounds fun.artichoke wrote:Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...paratactical wrote:You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
Agreed. Several of them are bangable, but they aren't actually attractive in any meaningful way.Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).
- gov
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I feel like this is going to turn into "picture time".
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
+ 1Bildungsroman wrote:I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.
- sophia.olive
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
He is the one that is going to getFuManChusco wrote:oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.
- sophia.olive
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
+ 1[/quote]
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
this is tcr,that guy will land in the friend zone, fumanchusco will be the target of the attractive girl with daddy issues.sophia.olive wrote:He is the one that is going to getFuManChusco wrote:oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.bangedkissed on the cheek
- thelaststraw05
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I'm married, so I don't need it to take me anywhere.FuManChusco wrote:oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Go for summer climates and lower LSAT scores. Look for UGs with fratstar populations. Go after Freshman and Soph UG girls, they are easier, more attractive and don't need constant validation that they are special or smart like law school girls.glitter178 wrote:+ 1Bildungsroman wrote:I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?artichoke wrote:Loooool, I'm sure.Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk
- gov
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I can appreciate high standards.Patriot1208 wrote:Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?artichoke wrote:Loooool, I'm sure.Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
But what do high standards mean if you go outside of them?Patriot1208 wrote:Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?artichoke wrote:Loooool, I'm sure.Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).sophia.olive wrote:If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk
- sophia.olive
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
and notice we are only talking about the attractivness of females.sophia.olive wrote:"or maybe people cut you down becauseyou're an arrogant bitch."
yeah
but honestly if I was a male it would have been
"or maybe people cut you down because you are confident"
--ImageRemoved--
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
You've never hooked up with someone you consider below your standards? What they mean for me, is what I strive for, I won't go below a certain point, and I won't marry below my high standards.mrmangs wrote:But what do high standards mean if you go outside of them?Patriot1208 wrote:Sure what? That I have high standards? or that I have dated/hooked up with average girls?artichoke wrote:Loooool, I'm sure.Patriot1208 wrote:naw dood, I just have high standards for what I consider attractive. I mean, they are average, and i've hooked up/dated plenty of average girls. But in no way are any of them objectively attractive (defined as, better than average, 7 or higher).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login