Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
StateSchoolSplitter
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:53 pm

Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby StateSchoolSplitter » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:36 am

Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby r6_philly » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:03 pm

StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.


Visit?

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby FuManChusco » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:07 pm

lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:11 pm

FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

User avatar
thelaststraw05
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby thelaststraw05 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:19 pm

r6_philly wrote:
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.


Visit?


TITCR.

I think it is fine to choose a school based on the quality of the student body (which is the way this thread is articulated), but it is kinda despicable to ask about the student body if all you are actually interested in finding out is the quality of the students' bodies.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:24 pm

thelaststraw05 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Describe the general student body at WUSTL. Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc. Anything that could help me make a decision.


Visit?


TITCR.

I think it is fine to choose a school based on the quality of the student body (which is the way this thread is articulated), but it is kinda despicable to ask about the student body if all you are actually interested in finding out is the quality of the students' bodies.


Also, if this is your motivation, i'd probably stay away from washu.

User avatar
thelaststraw05
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby thelaststraw05 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:28 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
thelaststraw05 wrote:I think it is fine to choose a school based on the quality of the student body (which is the way this thread is articulated), but it is kinda despicable to ask about the student body if all you are actually interested in finding out is the quality of the students' bodies.


Also, if this is your motivation, i'd probably stay away from washu.


Given the title of the thread:
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.


I think we kinda have to assume that is the motivation. Particularly given that the list fairly conspicuously includes:
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:Attitudes, dress, social behavior, looks, etc.

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:34 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

This is not true.
I complain about sexism, but speculating about the attractivness of girls at a school is not sexism. males and females are attracted to each other, duh...
Thinking a girl is limited in mental ability because she is attractive is sexism. But that really goes both ways, if I see a guy that has that tan, cali look im going to think he is dumb at first. Also, not allowing girls to speculate about the attractivness of guys at schools, or at least viewing them differently from the guys that do it because of it, is sexest.

on that note- I imagine NYU has the best looking guys based of "the best looking guys at NYU
Image
Image The girls actually look a little better than the guys.

anyways sorry, I know one girl that went to WUstl and she is about a 7.5. There no you can make a decision

oh... my friend just said he knows a girl that went there and she is fat. maybe a 5 he says.

It is probably preppy mid-western which is better than preppy east or west coast but still slightly annoying.
Last edited by sophia.olive on Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:40 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.

This is not true.
I complain about sexism


I'm not sure what the point of your post was, but all I got out of it was that you are fat and/or ugly.

User avatar
gov
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby gov » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:44 pm

I think its perfectly reasonable to be curious about the composition of the student body. That being said, I don't think its reasonable to base your decision on that...
Last edited by gov on Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:45 pm

I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.

User avatar
gov
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby gov » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm

sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.


I would say 2nd on the bottom row for guys

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby r6_philly » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm

Visit?

The day someone can tell me how attractive the student body is in my eyes ... :roll

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Bildungsroman » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:47 pm

I would like to know which law schools have then finest students. This will play a big role in my decision.

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:48 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.


I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.

User avatar
artichoke
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby artichoke » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:48 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.


Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.

User avatar
FlanAl
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:53 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby FlanAl » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:48 pm

the slide show on the schools website is probably the best you're going to get for a while. i don't think a lot of wustlers are going to be on here during finals. as far as the slideshow is concerned considering that its just a law school home-page slideshow I'd highly doubt that anything is photoshopped or airbrushed. SO at least what you see is what you get.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:50 pm

sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.



ummm, ehhh, :?

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:50 pm

artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.


Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.

yeah im totally confused, have you ever been around attractive girls?

User avatar
sophia.olive
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby sophia.olive » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:51 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.



ummm, ehhh, :?

really?..... what about bottom middle?

User avatar
gov
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby gov » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:52 pm

I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.



I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...
Last edited by gov on Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

krad
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:33 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby krad » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:52 pm

oh yes, this thread is back.

User avatar
Patriot1208
Posts: 7044
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby Patriot1208 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:54 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.

I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.



ummm, ehhh, :?

really?..... what about bottom middle?

In all seriousness, there isn't one girl on that picture you posted who is better than average.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby paratactical » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:54 pm

artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.


Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.


Yeah. I can't believe he forgot "uppity bitches".

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.

Postby FuManChusco » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:55 pm

sophia.olive wrote:
artichoke wrote:
Patriot1208 wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=140091

towards the bottom of page 1


We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.


Wow this is incredibly rude and totally not true.

yeah im totally confused, have you ever been around attractive girls?


you clearly missed the last thread on this topic. if I posted the picture you would understand. however, the thread would be locked.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: OtterLaw and 4 guests