Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
mrmangs
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby mrmangs » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:19 pm

lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?


someone call the wambulance.


have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:22 pm

mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?


someone call the wambulance.


have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?


I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.

mst
Posts: 925
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:01 am

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby mst » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:25 pm

I feel like I'm watching the start of the Menimist movement.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:26 pm

mst wrote:I feel like I'm watching the start of the Menimist movement.

The Men's Rights movement already exists.

User avatar
lawandi
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:32 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby lawandi » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:31 pm

paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?


I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.


The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:34 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?


I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.


The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my great LSAT score and decent GPA is less of a priority to me than privacy.


Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.

User avatar
Grizz
Posts: 10583
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby Grizz » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:39 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?


I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.


The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.


Lawl T20 doesn't mean much ITE.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:40 pm

rad law wrote:
Lawl T20 doesn't mean much ITE.


What kind of odds would you give me on lawandi getting personality Corsair'd at OCI?

User avatar
FuManChusco
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby FuManChusco » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:44 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?


I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.


The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.


You sound like you would be a good time at a party ms. wet blanket. If I was ashamed of my 2.6, I wouldn't have it in my profile. I'm proud. Plus, my LSAT is decent so I'm good. I could get a T20 too so keep up the useless bragging. To top it off, I don't have a gaping vagina full of sand and PMS like someone ITT.

Kaitlyn
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby Kaitlyn » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:57 pm

And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.

User avatar
Grizz
Posts: 10583
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby Grizz » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:07 pm

Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.


--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby kwais » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:09 pm

rad law wrote:
Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.


--ImageRemoved--


this response, along with every piece of garbage advice you've ever offered on this site, is as sad as your post count.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby Bildungsroman » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:13 pm

lawandi wrote: top 20 bound.


lawl

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:14 pm

Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:


Ha ha ha haha hahahahaha. Seriously? HAhahahaha. Yeah, this site is so terribly offensive and sexist. It's sooooo awful.

User avatar
Grizz
Posts: 10583
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby Grizz » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:14 pm

kwais wrote:
rad law wrote:
Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.


--ImageRemoved--


this response, along with every piece of garbage advice you've ever offered on this site, is as sad as your post count.


--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby kwais » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:17 pm

sweet. you posted it again.

krad
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:33 am

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby krad » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:19 pm

keeping an eye on this thread today :o

User avatar
dpk711
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby dpk711 » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:31 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.


Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?


I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.


The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.


GW or WUSTL?? Which one of them will you be lonely in??

User avatar
nematoad
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby nematoad » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:33 pm

why can't it be that OP is just looking for a viable egg? is it still objectification if he's looking out for the well being of his future children? baby, not everybody gets love.

User avatar
FunkyJD
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:38 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby FunkyJD » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:37 pm

rad law wrote:
Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.


--ImageRemoved--

I'm not taking sides here, but that is an amazing response.

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby beachbum » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:38 pm

paratactical wrote:Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.


+1. And Lady Gaga sucks.

User avatar
paratactical
Posts: 5961
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:39 pm

nematoad wrote:why can't it be that OP is just looking for a viable egg? is it still objectification if he's looking out for the well being of his future children? baby, not everybody gets love.

Yeah, it is pretty damn sexist to assume that the OP is only asking about these women for terrible reasons.

Frankly, I think this thread has been way more overwhelmingly sexist against men than it has against women. The only sexism against women here is that which the matriarchy has taught women to see in every innocent thought and gesture a man can make. I mean, my goodness, when will this assertion that every man is basically just a rapist waiting to happen end? Why do women not realize what it must be like for men to continually be accused of such henious sexual acts and identities with nary a thought for the emotional damage women do to men. Women think they have it bad in America? Pshaw. At least they aren't forced into a socially accepted genital mutilation at birth. Ridiculous.

TheOcho
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby TheOcho » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:42 pm

beachbum wrote:
paratactical wrote:Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.


+1. And Lady Gaga sucks.

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Postby beachbum » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:44 pm

Image




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests