Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.FuManChusco wrote:someone call the wambulance.lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU Forum
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.mrmangs wrote:Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote:have fun with your 2.6 gpa.FuManChusco wrote:someone call the wambulance.lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
-
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:01 am
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
I feel like I'm watching the start of the Menimist movement.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
The Men's Rights movement already exists.mst wrote:I feel like I'm watching the start of the Menimist movement.
- lawandi
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:32 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.paratactical wrote:I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.mrmangs wrote:Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.lawandi wrote:The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.paratactical wrote:I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.mrmangs wrote:Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my great LSAT score and decent GPA is less of a priority to me than privacy.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
Lawl T20 doesn't mean much ITE.lawandi wrote:The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.paratactical wrote:I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.mrmangs wrote:Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
What kind of odds would you give me on lawandi getting personality Corsair'd at OCI?rad law wrote:
Lawl T20 doesn't mean much ITE.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
You sound like you would be a good time at a party ms. wet blanket. If I was ashamed of my 2.6, I wouldn't have it in my profile. I'm proud. Plus, my LSAT is decent so I'm good. I could get a T20 too so keep up the useless bragging. To top it off, I don't have a gaping vagina full of sand and PMS like someone ITT.lawandi wrote:The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.paratactical wrote:I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.mrmangs wrote:Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again.
Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
--ImageRemoved--Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again.
Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
- kwais
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
this response, along with every piece of garbage advice you've ever offered on this site, is as sad as your post count.rad law wrote:--ImageRemoved--Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again.
Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
lawllawandi wrote: top 20 bound.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
Ha ha ha haha hahahahaha. Seriously? HAhahahaha. Yeah, this site is so terribly offensive and sexist. It's sooooo awful.Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
--ImageRemoved--kwais wrote:this response, along with every piece of garbage advice you've ever offered on this site, is as sad as your post count.rad law wrote:--ImageRemoved--Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again.
Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
- kwais
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
sweet. you posted it again.
-
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:33 am
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
keeping an eye on this thread today
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- dpk711
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
GW or WUSTL?? Which one of them will you be lonely in??lawandi wrote:The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.paratactical wrote:I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.mrmangs wrote:Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
- nematoad
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
why can't it be that OP is just looking for a viable egg? is it still objectification if he's looking out for the well being of his future children? baby, not everybody gets love.
- FunkyJD
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
I'm not taking sides here, but that is an amazing response.rad law wrote:--ImageRemoved--Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again.
Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
+1. And Lady Gaga sucks.paratactical wrote:Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
Yeah, it is pretty damn sexist to assume that the OP is only asking about these women for terrible reasons.nematoad wrote:why can't it be that OP is just looking for a viable egg? is it still objectification if he's looking out for the well being of his future children? baby, not everybody gets love.
Frankly, I think this thread has been way more overwhelmingly sexist against men than it has against women. The only sexism against women here is that which the matriarchy has taught women to see in every innocent thought and gesture a man can make. I mean, my goodness, when will this assertion that every man is basically just a rapist waiting to happen end? Why do women not realize what it must be like for men to continually be accused of such henious sexual acts and identities with nary a thought for the emotional damage women do to men. Women think they have it bad in America? Pshaw. At least they aren't forced into a socially accepted genital mutilation at birth. Ridiculous.
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:46 pm
Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU
beachbum wrote:+1. And Lady Gaga sucks.paratactical wrote:Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login