Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
mrmangs

Silver
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by mrmangs » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:19 pm

lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?

User avatar
paratactical

Platinum
Posts: 5885
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:22 pm

mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.

mst

Silver
Posts: 925
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:01 am

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by mst » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:25 pm

I feel like I'm watching the start of the Menimist movement.

User avatar
paratactical

Platinum
Posts: 5885
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:26 pm

mst wrote:I feel like I'm watching the start of the Menimist movement.
The Men's Rights movement already exists.

User avatar
lawandi

Bronze
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:32 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by lawandi » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:31 pm

paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.
The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
paratactical

Platinum
Posts: 5885
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:34 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.
The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my great LSAT score and decent GPA is less of a priority to me than privacy.
Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.

User avatar
Grizz

Diamond
Posts: 10564
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by Grizz » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:39 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.
The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
Lawl T20 doesn't mean much ITE.

User avatar
paratactical

Platinum
Posts: 5885
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:40 pm

rad law wrote:
Lawl T20 doesn't mean much ITE.
What kind of odds would you give me on lawandi getting personality Corsair'd at OCI?

User avatar
FuManChusco

Silver
Posts: 1217
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by FuManChusco » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:44 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.
The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
You sound like you would be a good time at a party ms. wet blanket. If I was ashamed of my 2.6, I wouldn't have it in my profile. I'm proud. Plus, my LSAT is decent so I'm good. I could get a T20 too so keep up the useless bragging. To top it off, I don't have a gaping vagina full of sand and PMS like someone ITT.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Kaitlyn

Bronze
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by Kaitlyn » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:57 pm

And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.

User avatar
Grizz

Diamond
Posts: 10564
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by Grizz » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:07 pm

Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
kwais

Gold
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by kwais » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:09 pm

rad law wrote:
Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
--ImageRemoved--
this response, along with every piece of garbage advice you've ever offered on this site, is as sad as your post count.

User avatar
Bildungsroman

Platinum
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by Bildungsroman » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:13 pm

lawandi wrote: top 20 bound.
lawl

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
paratactical

Platinum
Posts: 5885
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:14 pm

Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:
Ha ha ha haha hahahahaha. Seriously? HAhahahaha. Yeah, this site is so terribly offensive and sexist. It's sooooo awful.

User avatar
Grizz

Diamond
Posts: 10564
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by Grizz » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:14 pm

kwais wrote:
rad law wrote:
Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
--ImageRemoved--
this response, along with every piece of garbage advice you've ever offered on this site, is as sad as your post count.
--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
kwais

Gold
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by kwais » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:17 pm

sweet. you posted it again.

krad

Gold
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:33 am

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by krad » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:19 pm

keeping an eye on this thread today :o

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
dpk711

Silver
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by dpk711 » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:31 pm

lawandi wrote:
paratactical wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
lawandi wrote: have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Does anyone else notice the irony of judging this man by his GPA?
I think it's symbolic of the way that the matriarchy oppresses men into only being valued by how much money they can make and spend on their sexual partners.
The irony was intended. Whenever a man objectifies a woman I think it's best to respond by making him feel bad about himself too.

And thanks for all of your concern, but I am top 20 bound. Flaunting my stats is less of a priority to me than privacy.
GW or WUSTL?? Which one of them will you be lonely in??

User avatar
nematoad

Bronze
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by nematoad » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:33 pm

why can't it be that OP is just looking for a viable egg? is it still objectification if he's looking out for the well being of his future children? baby, not everybody gets love.

User avatar
FunkyJD

Silver
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:38 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by FunkyJD » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:37 pm

rad law wrote:
Kaitlyn wrote:And the raging casual sexism on this site rears its head once again. :roll:

Nice try, lawandi, but this conversation is clearly not worth your time.
--ImageRemoved--
I'm not taking sides here, but that is an amazing response.

User avatar
beachbum

Gold
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by beachbum » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:38 pm

paratactical wrote:Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.
+1. And Lady Gaga sucks.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
paratactical

Platinum
Posts: 5885
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by paratactical » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:39 pm

nematoad wrote:why can't it be that OP is just looking for a viable egg? is it still objectification if he's looking out for the well being of his future children? baby, not everybody gets love.
Yeah, it is pretty damn sexist to assume that the OP is only asking about these women for terrible reasons.

Frankly, I think this thread has been way more overwhelmingly sexist against men than it has against women. The only sexism against women here is that which the matriarchy has taught women to see in every innocent thought and gesture a man can make. I mean, my goodness, when will this assertion that every man is basically just a rapist waiting to happen end? Why do women not realize what it must be like for men to continually be accused of such henious sexual acts and identities with nary a thought for the emotional damage women do to men. Women think they have it bad in America? Pshaw. At least they aren't forced into a socially accepted genital mutilation at birth. Ridiculous.

TheOcho

Bronze
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by TheOcho » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:42 pm

beachbum wrote:
paratactical wrote:Yeah, you totes sound like the intended irony type and not the woefully alone because anyone without serious mental defects would rather die than spend a minute with you type.
+1. And Lady Gaga sucks.

User avatar
beachbum

Gold
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Post by beachbum » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:44 pm

Image

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “Choosing a Law School”