University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
Bluesickle
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:56 am

University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby Bluesickle » Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:58 pm

Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Let's break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Last edited by Bluesickle on Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Adjudicator
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby Adjudicator » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:00 pm

Enjoy working at McDonalds! :)

User avatar
maxm2764
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby maxm2764 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:01 pm

Bluesickle wrote:Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Lets break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!


When was the last time Oregon won a national title?

Edit: Lol at adjudicator's post.

User avatar
usuaggie
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby usuaggie » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:10 pm

Adjudicator wrote:Enjoy working at McDonalds! :)



OUCH hot coffee $$$$$$$$

User avatar
stratocophic
Posts: 2207
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby stratocophic » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:13 pm

maxm2764 wrote:
Bluesickle wrote:Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Lets break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!


When was the last time Oregon won a national title?

Edit: Lol at adjudicator's post.
I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them

User avatar
maxm2764
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby maxm2764 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:22 pm

stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them


+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.

User avatar
maxm2764
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby maxm2764 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:23 pm

Oh, and the answer is never.

User avatar
usuaggie
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby usuaggie » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:45 pm

maxm2764 wrote:
stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them


+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.



http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc10.htm

User avatar
maxm2764
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby maxm2764 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:10 pm

usuaggie wrote:
maxm2764 wrote:
stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them


+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.



http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc10.htm


Cool bro. That doesn't disprove my earlier post. The only thing that shows is how top-heavy the PAC-10 is. The top two teams are legit, legit enough that they bring the rest of the conference up with them. Look at the drop off between Stanford and Arizona, that's almost laughable.

The top 4 or 5 teams in the SEC are all around the 90 range. So, the conference is not as top-heavy, but that's thanks to the quality of competition within the conference itself.

Nice try.

User avatar
Bluesickle
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:56 am

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby Bluesickle » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:46 pm

maxm2764 wrote:
usuaggie wrote:
maxm2764 wrote:
stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them


+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.



http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc10.htm


Cool bro. That doesn't disprove my earlier post. The only thing that shows is how top-heavy the PAC-10 is. The top two teams are legit, legit enough that they bring the rest of the conference up with them. Look at the drop off between Stanford and Arizona, that's almost laughable.

The top 4 or 5 teams in the SEC are all around the 90 range. So, the conference is not as top-heavy, but that's thanks to the quality of competition within the conference itself.

Nice try.



Lil Weazy just used bro...hilarity ensued

Top marks for the SEC troll!

User avatar
maxm2764
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby maxm2764 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:53 pm

Bluesickle wrote:

Lil Weazy just used bro...hilarity ensued

Top marks for the SEC troll!


Sarcasm went over your head I guess? PAC-10 delusional also misspelled Weezy.

User avatar
BarbellDreams
Posts: 2256
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby BarbellDreams » Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:03 pm

In the middle of a 16 hour work day perfecting my outlines and re-reading every single Civ pro case we ever read. I needed that laugh, thanks. Though I will say I doubt Texas will be a laugher long with that recruiting class.

imbored25
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:58 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby imbored25 » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:54 am

Bluesickle wrote:Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Let's break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!


except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history. whens the last time you guys went to a natl champioship, thats right never, last heisman trophy winner, none, you have been to a laughable 23 bowl games of which you only won 9, all americans: 2, so id stfu if i was you.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby Bildungsroman » Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:06 am

imbored25 wrote:except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.


And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.

User avatar
Bluesickle
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:56 am

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby Bluesickle » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:21 pm


User avatar
maxm2764
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby maxm2764 » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:30 pm

Bluesickle wrote:Note, a typical SEC fan:

http://deadspin.com/5705678/natty-light ... out-auburn


Note, a typical day in the tough PAC-10:

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/news/story?id=5885712

What were they fighting about? Who would be over .500?

Edit: That video is hilarious, touche.

User avatar
usuaggie
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby usuaggie » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:14 pm

Bildungsroman wrote:
imbored25 wrote:except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.


And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.



this, and the fact that the OP was obviously joking.

HeavenWood
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby HeavenWood » Sun Dec 05, 2010 7:02 pm

usuaggie wrote:
Bildungsroman wrote:
imbored25 wrote:except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.


And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.



this, and the fact that the OP was obviously joking.


Too bad he isn't funny.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: University of Oregon - seriously under-ranked

Postby Bildungsroman » Mon Dec 06, 2010 1:43 am

usuaggie wrote:
Bildungsroman wrote:
imbored25 wrote:except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.


And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.



this, and the fact that the OP was obviously joking.

:roll:




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 20171lhopeful, Google Adsense [Bot], hwwong, lymenheimer, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests