CLS sucks for Public Interest?

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Renzo
Posts: 4265
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am

Re: CLS sucks for Public Interest?

Postby Renzo » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:37 pm

JG Hall wrote:
Borhas wrote:
JG Hall wrote: (unless you're an LLM and want more hot water).


people getting catty over at CLS huh

I'll admit, I abhor the LLMs. I should probably just let them pad the curve and get over it.

Seriously. I don't even bother going to corporations, because the LLMs have already filled the bottom half of the grade distribution.

User avatar
Borhas
Posts: 4856
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: CLS sucks for Public Interest?

Postby Borhas » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:43 pm

seems weird for a school to grade LLMs and JD students on the same curve

Renzo
Posts: 4265
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am

Re: CLS sucks for Public Interest?

Postby Renzo » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:53 pm

Borhas wrote:seems weird for a school to grade LLMs and JD students on the same curve

Not for final class rank, but in each individual class. I don't know how you would do it otherwise in a blind-graded exam.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kolikotime, Pozzo and 3 guests