Why you gotta be so cruel (i.e. rigorous)?ToTransferOrNot wrote:Ok ok, enough you two--back in your corners for your exam studying. Gogo. You have 4 whole exams this quarter--like every law student at every other law school ever has their first semester. FEEL THE RIGOR!!dresden doll wrote:You laughed rigorously. That's how!doyleoil wrote:seriously - i don't know how i managed to find time to laugh what with all the RIGOR - but somehow it happeneddresden doll wrote:I would like to interrupt the serious business that is this thread to thank Regionality for the link. Well played.
Columbia v. Chicago Forum
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
I didn't used to be rigorous, but then I transferred to UChicago and it taught me to vigorously apply myself in my endeavors.
- Mr. T6
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:54 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Carried away.
Last edited by Mr. T6 on Thu May 13, 2010 1:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- omega_watts
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Wow
Last edited by omega_watts on Thu May 13, 2010 1:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Regionality
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:13 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Delete due to mulligan.
Last edited by Regionality on Thu May 13, 2010 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mr. T6
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 7:54 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Nah, I just got a little carried away. You know how you can get carried away with your prose sometimes? I didn't like Law School. This isn't an uncommon feeling.
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:40 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
If you're really unhappy, seeing a psychologist can really be helpful. If nothing else, it can be really nice to have someone you can talk to completely honestly and openly who will listen. There's nothing wrong with going to see one, it's not like you have to be clinically depressed or have some serious mental problem to benefit from someone to talk to and to get honest feedback from.Mr. T6 wrote:Nah, I just got a little carried away. You know how you can get carried away with your prose sometimes? I didn't like Law School. This isn't an uncommon feeling.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
I heart Tautology's screen name.
I am now obscenely tempted to start it up: CLS is CLS. Chi is Chi. Chi isn't CLS. CLS isn't Chi.
(Okay, I'll stop now.)
I am now obscenely tempted to start it up: CLS is CLS. Chi is Chi. Chi isn't CLS. CLS isn't Chi.
(Okay, I'll stop now.)
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Wowza. I see someone didn't enjoy Chicago.
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=117381dresden doll wrote:I heart Tautology's screen name.
I am now obscenely tempted to start it up: CLS is CLS. Chi is Chi. Chi isn't CLS. CLS isn't Chi.
(Okay, I'll stop now.)
!!!
- Regionality
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:13 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Redundant is redundant.Tofu wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=117381dresden doll wrote:I heart Tautology's screen name.
I am now obscenely tempted to start it up: CLS is CLS. Chi is Chi. Chi isn't CLS. CLS isn't Chi.
(Okay, I'll stop now.)
!!!
- clintonius
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
oh ahah whoops didn't read page 4Regionality wrote:Redundant is redundant.Tofu wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=117381dresden doll wrote:I heart Tautology's screen name.
I am now obscenely tempted to start it up: CLS is CLS. Chi is Chi. Chi isn't CLS. CLS isn't Chi.
(Okay, I'll stop now.)
!!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:40 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Seriously, am I gonna end up disrupting every thread I participate in from now on?
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Disruptive posters are disruptive. That's all I know.Tautology wrote:Seriously, am I gonna end up disrupting every thread I participate in from now on?
- jive_bird44
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Chicago has a higher general level of "law schoolishness" than most every other law school. People at low ranked schools are (generally) too stupid to know they are screwed and people at top 9 schools are (generally) smart enought to know they are set for life. Chicago people have a combination of both.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Useless poster is useless.jive_bird44 wrote:Chicago has a higher general level of "law schoolishness" than most every other law school. People at low ranked schools are (generally) too stupid to know they are screwed and people at top 9 schools are (generally) smart enought to know they are set for life. Chicago people have a combination of both.
This statement is based on... what, again? Your knowledge of what goes on in lower ranked schools? Because at Wisconsin, pretty much everyone knew that if they weren't toward the top of the class, they were screwed. All of the transfers from other schools say exactly the same thing about the environments they transferred out of. All of the 2L transfers I knew at Wisconsin last year said the same thing about the environments they transferred out of. The two groups combined represents a fairly broad range of schools.
People at "Top 9" (lol what kind of cutoff is that) are not necessarily set for life, especially in this economy. Putting aside the obvious problems of no offers and "indefinite deferrals," being below median puts you at risk, even at CCN, right now. Further, people at all of these schools still aim for clerkships.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- swampthang
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
Funny, cuz this was actually my experience at UChi ASW. Went out drinking and dancing till 4, got back to my host's place and he wasted no time in rolling a fattie. I felt that any preconceptions I had held about the place were instantly shattered.miamiman wrote:Not that I really care if OP chooses Chicago or Columbia, but isn't it somewhat ridiculous to think that Chicago is any more intense right now than any other law school in the country?
You really think Michigan kids are throwing back beers, burning blunts, and shooting darts more often than kids at other T10s?
Last edited by swampthang on Thu May 13, 2010 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jive_bird44
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
This statement is based on... what, again? [/quote]
The fact that I've attended two different law schools too.
The fact that I've attended two different law schools too.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Columbia v. Chicago
The fact that I've attended two different law schools too.[/quote]jive_bird44 wrote:This statement is based on... what, again?
One of which was UChi, I presume?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login