dibs wrote:TL;DR, probably a lame rant anyways.
i have no vested interested in this debate other than my own entertainment. really just lurking.
however, when prospective law students claim "tl;dr" as a method of dismissing something, doesn't that strike you as fairly ironic? aren't you going to be spending 3 years reading as much as humanly possible in order to effectively understand and assess differing sides of an argument?
i find it funny.
Law and cases =/= your disjointed ramblings. HTH.