(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
ggocat wrote:these are either real or shooped because the years in the column (for LSAT/employment/etc.) are correct.
Exactly-- looking just at BC for myself the percentiles are perfect. I feel bad for Fordham.
I really thought BC would rise, especially with the recent NLJ250 numbers and their 166 median LSAT (versus 164 last year)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: RParadela and 5 guests