USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously Forum
- A'nold
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:07 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
That would be great if this was a hoax.
- YCrevolution
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Upon first look, I though the schools had "moved up" too. But I had to remember something: if they can be said to be tied for the high number, they can also be tied for the low number, as well.D. H2Oman wrote:It's about damn time, the fact that they weren't already there makes the USNews rankings look like a jokegogo wrote:what do people think about UGA moving up to #28?
I said before, being tied with five other schools means it is really #28, #33 and everything in between.
Same response as above. UC-Davis and UGA are tied with four other schools for #28 AND #33.arhmcpo wrote:What is going on with Davis? Really? I didn't even seriously consider them a year ago but all they do is go up and up
Last edited by PDaddy on Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
- YCrevolution
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:26 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I don't think it should have been included in a disclaimer, Irvine's inaugural class is still in 1L, how could they even be ranked?YCrevolution wrote:Aside from the Irvine issue (it should have been included in the disclaimer clause about not being ranked because it's provisionally accredited), spot-checking the numbers, they appear to be fine. Moreover, if it was a hoax, the person spent a lot of time making it seem realistic aside from just visuals (bumping NE and HI back into T2, ranking the schools that have just become/recertified as fully accredited, etc.)primusux wrote:jl2032 wrote:Yes, I did... I'm just messing with the 2am crowd...
I think a few others on here bought the book as well...
You think I got the store in trouble for releasing it early? I got it for $9.95, which is the listed price, but then heard they started charging $15 for it. They must have known something was up...
A hoax would be nice at this point. My brain hurts
Note that I'm going with this as legit until proven differently....unfortunately
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Yep, like I said....unfortunately legitYCrevolution wrote:Aside from the Irvine issue (it should have been included in the disclaimer clause about not being ranked because it's provisionally accredited), spot-checking the numbers, they appear to be fine. Moreover, if it was a hoax, the person spent a lot of time making it seem realistic aside from just visuals (bumping NE and HI back into T2, ranking the schools that have just become/recertified as fully accredited, etc.)primusux wrote:jl2032 wrote:Yes, I did... I'm just messing with the 2am crowd...
I think a few others on here bought the book as well...
You think I got the store in trouble for releasing it early? I got it for $9.95, which is the listed price, but then heard they started charging $15 for it. They must have known something was up...
A hoax would be nice at this point. My brain hurts
Note that I'm going with this as legit until proven differently....unfortunately
- YCrevolution
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am
- DarkwingDick
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:59 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
lmao.Nightrunner wrote:*sigh* still not accredited.MoS wrote:So, no appearance by UC-Irvine
- Son of Cicero
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:24 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Actually, I happened to read your post when my aspie coach was still here, and I consequently learned that your subtle technique of punctuating questions concerning insignificant matters with "?!?" and "???" meant that you were not being straightforward. However, (1) since you hadn't been officially reproached for using an attention-grabbing title to get people to click on a thread in which you supplied nothing of substance, and (2) as I hadn't yet posted my customary announcement that I had put out any effort at site management, I decided to make a post which, through the manifest insincerity of its ultimate message, would create a context of levity in which I could achieve both objectives without the drawbacks of a more sober approach (i.e., exposure to the risks of coming across as assholishly censorious or self-serving). I figured this lack of sincerity would be obvious in a post that represented the mods as self-righteous and mentally cracked (what other kind of person advocates "ego-immolation" at all, let alone when the greater cause is...this (see the past 37 pages)), but I guess I should have added more superfluous punctuation so that the masters of sarcasm would know not to take things at full face value.mavsman88 wrote:My sarcasm has yet again gone unnoticed, and I am hardly in it for the "fame". The rankings were released, I had contacted USNWR who confirmed this. I didnt title it here are the rankings, or 2011 rankings leaked, just that they had been released and i was searching for someone to track them down. Also, the STFU comment was just out of line and immature. Consider me disheartened.Son of Cicero wrote:i figured we were doing you a favor by not fully appropriating the OP spot. You could have given the thread a title that didn't suggest that you were delivering the goods, but you were in it for the glory. Take what you can get, man. I mean, I even did something useful like made all of the links pretty and compile everything in one spot, and I don't ask for "props." If it were not for countless such acts of ego-immolation on the altar of Ken, TLS's flame couldn't burn this brightly.mavsman88 wrote:What?!? No props for starting the thread??? I know I had nothing to do with the actual leak, but a little shout out would've been nice
Let that knowledge be your reward as you go forth and selflessly do good things (or as you STFU).
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
1) OP wasn't the one who posted any scans.PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
2) The scan has Minnesota at #22
3) NR was nice enough to transfer the scan into a more readable format and accidentally left out Minnesota, which was then later corrected.
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I'm not really sure what you just said, but I hope this helps: linkPDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Its okay... it didn't really haven any impact on the rankings. Is Minnesota even an accredited law school? Or a state for that matter?Nightrunner wrote:Truth.Richie Tenenbaum wrote:1) OP wasn't the one who posted any scans.PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
2) The scan has Minnesota at #22
3) NR was nice enough to transfer the scan into a more readable format and accidentally left out Minnesota, which was then later corrected.
ETA: Totally mt fault on overlooking Minnesota; I corrected it as soon as it was pointed out, but several people kept using the quoted original post.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:34 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Now, for schools that fell substantially (4 spots and up) like Fordham (-4), Alabama (-8, Yikes!), Maryland (-5), do you think this could screw up their entering class this fall because some admits into these schools who are numbers conscious, could decide to withdraw and go to other schools and just wait 'til next year to apply to other schools? 'Cause I'm thinking there are probably some people who were on the fence waiting on the rankings to come out. So, now some of this schools might not even have a full class come August!zizou wrote:1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago +1
6. NYU -1
7. Cal-Berkeley -1
7. Penn +1
9. Michigan
10. Virginia
11. Duke -1
11. Northwestern -1
13. Cornell
14. Georgetown
15. UCLA
15. Texas
17. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. WUSTL
20. GW +8
21. Illinois +2
22. BU -2
22. Emory -2
22. Minnesota -2
22. Notre Dame +1
26. Iowa
27. Indiana -4
28. Boston College -2
28. William & Mary
28. UC-Davis +7
28. Georgia +7
28. North Carolina +2
28. Wisconsin +7
34. Fordham -4
34. Ohio State +1
34. Washington -4
34. Washington & Lee -4
38. Arizona State +17
38. Alabama -8
37. Colorado - Boulder +8
38. Wake Forest +2
42. BYU -1
42. George Mason -1
42. Arizona +1
42. UC-Hastings -3
42. Utah +3
47. Florida +4
48. American -3
48. SMU +1
48. Tulane -3
48. Maryland -5
Tier 2
52. Pepperdine +3
52. Yeshiva -3
54. Florida State -2
54. UConn -2
56. Case Western -1
56. Loyola - CA +15
56. Cincinnati -4
56. San Diego +5
60. Georgia State +5
60. Houston -1
60. Miami +11
60. Tennessee-Knoxville -1
64. Baylor +1
64. Lewis & Clark -3
64. Kentucky -9
67. Brooklyn -6
67. Kansas -2
67. New Mexico +10
67. Pittsburgh +4
67. Villanova -6
72. Penn State -7
72. Seton Hall +5
72. St. John's +15
72. Temple -7
72. Hawai'i +28
72. Oklahoma -1
78. Loyola - Chicago +9
78. UNLV -2
80. Chicago-Kent -3
80. LSU -5
80. Rutgers-Camden -3
80. Rutgers - Newark +7
80. Denver -3
80. Oregon -3
86. Hofstra +14
86. Indiana-Indianapolis +1
86. Northeastern +8
86. Seattle -9
86. Syracuse +14
86. Arkansas-Fayeteville +8
86. Richmond -9
93. Chapman +7
93. Santa Clara -8
93. Missouri -28
93. Nebraska-Lincoln +7
93. West Virginia +7
98. Catholic -4
98. DePaul -11
98. San Fransisco
98. Pacific-McGeorge +2
98. William Mitchell +2
Someone should double check these, just did them in a rush.
- OneKnight
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
You may wish these to be fake rankings, but they appear to be the real deal. Sorry if your school fell in the rankingsPDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:19 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
The original Flickr link with the scanned pages doesn't seem to be working anymore, but here's another link with those pages:
http://brightcoast.wordpress.com/2010/0 ... -rankings/
http://brightcoast.wordpress.com/2010/0 ... -rankings/
- quickquestionthanks
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
It'd be easier to fake a bunch of European passports than fake these rankings. No way, no how.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I knowquickquestionthanks wrote:PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
It'd be easier to fake a bunch of European passports than fake these rankings. No way, no how.
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Naaaw. My school didn't fall. In fact, I don't even know where I am going. Still waiting on a few top-10's (Chicago included) and some others.OneKnight wrote:You may wish these to be fake rankings, but they appear to be the real deal. Sorry if your school fell in the rankingsPDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
OP forgot Minnesota in the original ranking, but the gap occurred between 25 and 27. OP came back and claimed Minnesota was #22, which wouldn't have affected the gap. The numbers were changed to make it work.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I'm with PDiddy...not because I believe he is correct but because I hope he is correct.PDaddy wrote:I knowquickquestionthanks wrote:It'd be easier to fake a bunch of European passports than fake these rankings. No way, no how.PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
- quickquestionthanks
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
swheat wrote:I'm with PDiddy...not because I believe he is correct but because I hope he is correct.PDaddy wrote:I knowquickquestionthanks wrote:It'd be easier to fake a bunch of European passports than fake these rankings. No way, no how.PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
There's a power of prayer thread going on if you wanna get down on that...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I only pray to Zoroasterquickquestionthanks wrote:
There's a power of prayer thread going on if you wanna get down on that...
- quickquestionthanks
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Better than Vishnuswheat wrote:I only pray to Zoroasterquickquestionthanks wrote:
There's a power of prayer thread going on if you wanna get down on that...
- Son of Cicero
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:24 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Thanks, bro-ski.stanfordsucks wrote:The original Flickr link with the scanned pages doesn't seem to be working anymore, but here's another link with those pages:
http://brightcoast.wordpress.com/2010/0 ... -rankings/
- trialjunky
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:41 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
swheat wrote:I'm with PDiddy...not because I believe he is correct but because I hope he is correct.PDaddy wrote:I knowquickquestionthanks wrote:It'd be easier to fake a bunch of European passports than fake these rankings. No way, no how.PDaddy wrote: This ranking is as phony as a three dollar bill...
+1
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login