USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
cindytran872

New
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:58 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by cindytran872 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:18 pm

[...]
Last edited by cindytran872 on Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
donzoli

Bronze
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:53 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by donzoli » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:19 pm

zizou wrote:1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago +1
6. NYU -1
7. Cal-Berkeley -1
7. Penn +1
9. Michigan
10. Virginia
11. Duke -1
11. Northwestern -1
13. Cornell
14. Georgetown
15. UCLA
15. Texas
17. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. WUSTL
20. GW +8
21. Illinois +2
22. BU -2
22. Emory -2
22. Minnesota -2
22. Notre Dame +1
26. Iowa
27. Indiana -4
28. Boston College -2
28. William & Mary
28. UC-Davis +7
28. Georgia +7
28. North Carolina +2
28. Wisconsin +7
34. Fordham -4
34. Ohio State +1
34. Washington -4
34. Washington & Lee -4
38. Arizona State +17
38. Alabama -8
37. Colorado - Boulder +8
38. Wake Forest +2
42. BYU -1
42. George Mason -1
42. Arizona +1
42. UC-Hastings -3
42. Utah +3
47. Florida +4
48. American -3
48. SMU +1
48. Tulane -3
48. Maryland -5

Tier 2

52. Pepperdine +3
52. Yeshiva -3
54. Florida State -2
54. UConn -2
56. Case Western -1
56. Loyola - CA +15
56. Cincinnati -4
56. San Diego +5
60. Georgia State +5
60. Houston -1
60. Miami +11
60. Tennessee-Knoxville -1
64. Baylor +1
64. Lewis & Clark -3
64. Kentucky -9
67. Brooklyn -6
67. Kansas -2
67. New Mexico +10
67. Pittsburgh +4
67. Villanova -6
72. Penn State -7
72. Seton Hall +5
72. St. John's +15
72. Temple -7
72. Hawai'i +28
72. Oklahoma -1
78. Loyola - Chicago +9
78. UNLV -2
80. Chicago-Kent -3
80. LSU -5
80. Rutgers-Camden -3
80. Rutgers - Newark +7
80. Denver -3
80. Oregon -3
86. Hofstra +14
86. Indiana-Indianapolis +1
86. Northeastern +8
86. Seattle -9
86. Syracuse +14
86. Arkansas-Fayeteville +8
86. Richmond -9
93. Chapman +7
93. Santa Clara -8
93. Missouri -28
93. Nebraska-Lincoln +7
93. West Virginia +7
98. Catholic -4
98. DePaul -11
98. San Fransisco
98. Pacific-McGeorge +2
98. William Mitchell +2

Someone should double check these, just did them in a rush.

I find the 28 spot interesting. You got three jumps of 7 and a 2. What gives with Wisconsin, Davis, and Georgia all jumping so much?

pelmen74

Bronze
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by pelmen74 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:19 pm

nycparalegal wrote:
DVZfan wrote:
Torvon wrote:Lol @ NU having a lower peer assessment score than GULC and Cornell :lol:
Yeah that really sucks for NU and it has not been able to really escape that for a very long time!
Yet it had the best placement in the NJ250 survey. Quite the paradox.
I assume there is a strong self-selection bias. NU does have the reputation for older students, most of which go to law school because they want to get paid, hence BigLaw. I assume the percentage doing clerkships or public service in NU is low (correct me if I'm wrong). This contribute to low peer assessment, especially from judges. Plus, NJ250 stats does not mean good Vault 20 placement stats which I assume could make a difference in peer assessment.

dshirs32

New
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by dshirs32 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:20 pm

Why did University of Richmond drop 9 spots from 77 to 86? Seems very surprising

dreamweaver87

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:12 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by dreamweaver87 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:20 pm

Nightrunner wrote:
dreamweaver87 wrote:where's minnesota, though?
#22. I missed it in the first type-up.

ah, looking at the scans now. thanks.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
hiromoto45

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by hiromoto45 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:22 pm

Where did UC-Irvine rank? I can't seem to find it.

User avatar
jmhendri

Silver
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by jmhendri » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:24 pm

hiromoto45 wrote:Where did UC-Irvine rank? I can't seem to find it.
Irvine's ranking is a pure estimation by TLS. It's not accredited yet.

User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by ggocat » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:25 pm

hiromoto45 wrote:Where did UC-Irvine rank? I can't seem to find it.
Not until it's accredited. That takes several years.

HTH for the millionth time.

peterswe

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:52 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by peterswe » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:26 pm

Good to see Loyola-Chicago moving back up.

Wonder what the deal was with Depaul?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


honestabe84

Bronze
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:47 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by honestabe84 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:28 pm

donzoli wrote:
zizou wrote:1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago +1
6. NYU -1
7. Cal-Berkeley -1
7. Penn +1
9. Michigan
10. Virginia
11. Duke -1
11. Northwestern -1
13. Cornell
14. Georgetown
15. UCLA
15. Texas
17. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. WUSTL
20. GW +8
21. Illinois +2
22. BU -2
22. Emory -2
22. Minnesota -2
22. Notre Dame +1
26. Iowa
27. Indiana -4
28. Boston College -2
28. William & Mary
28. UC-Davis +7
28. Georgia +7
28. North Carolina +2
28. Wisconsin +7
34. Fordham -4
34. Ohio State +1
34. Washington -4
34. Washington & Lee -4
38. Arizona State +17
38. Alabama -8
37. Colorado - Boulder +8
38. Wake Forest +2
42. BYU -1
42. George Mason -1
42. Arizona +1
42. UC-Hastings -3
42. Utah +3
47. Florida +4
48. American -3
48. SMU +1
48. Tulane -3
48. Maryland -5

Tier 2

52. Pepperdine +3
52. Yeshiva -3
54. Florida State -2
54. UConn -2
56. Case Western -1
56. Loyola - CA +15
56. Cincinnati -4
56. San Diego +5
60. Georgia State +5
60. Houston -1
60. Miami +11
60. Tennessee-Knoxville -1
64. Baylor +1
64. Lewis & Clark -3
64. Kentucky -9
67. Brooklyn -6
67. Kansas -2
67. New Mexico +10
67. Pittsburgh +4
67. Villanova -6
72. Penn State -7
72. Seton Hall +5
72. St. John's +15
72. Temple -7
72. Hawai'i +28
72. Oklahoma -1
78. Loyola - Chicago +9
78. UNLV -2
80. Chicago-Kent -3
80. LSU -5
80. Rutgers-Camden -3
80. Rutgers - Newark +7
80. Denver -3
80. Oregon -3
86. Hofstra +14
86. Indiana-Indianapolis +1
86. Northeastern +8
86. Seattle -9
86. Syracuse +14
86. Arkansas-Fayeteville +8
86. Richmond -9
93. Chapman +7
93. Santa Clara -8
93. Missouri -28
93. Nebraska-Lincoln +7
93. West Virginia +7
98. Catholic -4
98. DePaul -11
98. San Fransisco
98. Pacific-McGeorge +2
98. William Mitchell +2

Someone should double check these, just did them in a rush.

I find the 28 spot interesting. You got three jumps of 7 and a 2. What gives with Wisconsin, Davis, and Georgia all jumping so much?
That's the most movement I've ever seen. I mean moving 15 or 16 spots is huge, but 28???

User avatar
quetzalcoatl

Bronze
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:23 am

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by quetzalcoatl » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:30 pm

Hawai just flew from T3 to mid T2, impressive.

Glad to see Chicago is back in its rightful place :)

goansongo

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:19 am

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by goansongo » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:30 pm

cindytran872 wrote:Minnesota or GW?
Cooley.

User avatar
YCrevolution

Gold
Posts: 3854
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by YCrevolution » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:31 pm

..

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by rayiner » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:33 pm

pelmen74 wrote:
nycparalegal wrote:
DVZfan wrote:
Torvon wrote:Lol @ NU having a lower peer assessment score than GULC and Cornell :lol:
Yeah that really sucks for NU and it has not been able to really escape that for a very long time!
Yet it had the best placement in the NJ250 survey. Quite the paradox.
I assume there is a strong self-selection bias. NU does have the reputation for older students, most of which go to law school because they want to get paid, hence BigLaw. I assume the percentage doing clerkships or public service in NU is low (correct me if I'm wrong). This contribute to low peer assessment, especially from judges. Plus, NJ250 stats does not mean good Vault 20 placement stats which I assume could make a difference in peer assessment.
http://lawfirmaddict.blogspot.com/2006/ ... ement.html

User avatar
Nicholasnickynic

Silver
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by Nicholasnickynic » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:34 pm

dshirs32 wrote:Why did University of Richmond drop 9 spots from 77 to 86? Seems very surprising
Because its a crappy school... read the tls profile... doesn't really have a lot going for it...

User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by rayiner » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:39 pm

holybartender wrote:
los blancos wrote:
holybartender wrote:She deserves the credit, she sent me a bulk pdf of all of it and I separated and hosted it for her since she was at work. I'm also at work but, well, I guess that's why she's in at Columbia and I'm not.
It could be worse. You could have lost your only t10 acceptance. :mrgreen:
Suddenly the crusade for the T12 strikes a pretty important string in my heart.
Do people who use "T10" also say "T5" instead of "T6"? BC if you're going to use completely arbitrary "round number" breaks instead of looking at the point totals, you should be consistent about it!

showNprove

Silver
Posts: 968
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:52 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by showNprove » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:41 pm

rayiner wrote:
holybartender wrote:
los blancos wrote:
holybartender wrote:She deserves the credit, she sent me a bulk pdf of all of it and I separated and hosted it for her since she was at work. I'm also at work but, well, I guess that's why she's in at Columbia and I'm not.
It could be worse. You could have lost your only t10 acceptance. :mrgreen:
Suddenly the crusade for the T12 strikes a pretty important string in my heart.
Do people who use "T10" also say "T5" instead of "T6"? BC if you're going to use completely arbitrary "round number" breaks, you should be consistent about it!
I say "T5"--but that's because I think NYU floats somewhere between CC and MVBP.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Always Credited

Gold
Posts: 2501
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by Always Credited » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:42 pm

sibley wrote:
Doritos wrote:
Always Credited wrote:
sibley wrote:I want to know the story behind how she got the rankings!

I want to know the story behind how you were going to sue Georgetown.
lol
it's posted already.
So is the story behind how these rankings were released. Indeed, we're actually still posting in the thread where it went down!

User avatar
jack duluoz

Bronze
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by jack duluoz » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:44 pm

looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.

pelmen74

Bronze
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by pelmen74 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:44 pm

Nightrunner wrote:
rayiner wrote:
pelmen74 wrote: I assume there is a strong self-selection bias. NU does have the reputation for older students, most of which go to law school because they want to get paid, hence BigLaw. I assume the percentage doing clerkships or public service in NU is low (correct me if I'm wrong). This contribute to low peer assessment, especially from judges. Plus, NJ250 stats does not mean good Vault 20 placement stats which I assume could make a difference in peer assessment.
http://lawfirmaddict.blogspot.com/2006/ ... ement.html
and BOOM goes the dynamite.
I see that I am making lots of assumption. Apparently they are all fantastically accurate 8)

User avatar
pennstatepride

New
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:08 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by pennstatepride » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:46 pm

jack duluoz wrote:looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
Look at the GPA/LSAT medians....no fudging necessary

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Always Credited

Gold
Posts: 2501
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by Always Credited » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:49 pm

jack duluoz wrote:looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
Apparently every school making any sort of well deserved headway back into the rank where its nearly always been ranked fudged current data to get there.

HooCavalier

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by HooCavalier » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:54 pm

pennstatepride wrote:
jack duluoz wrote:looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
Look at the GPA/LSAT medians....no fudging necessary
The truth.

User avatar
holybartender

Bronze
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by holybartender » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:55 pm

oh lord am I at risk for a lawsuit now =(

User avatar
chadwick218

Silver
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm

Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously

Post by chadwick218 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:56 pm

The biggest losser appears to be the University of Missouri. Down 34 spots from 59 to 93!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”