USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously Forum
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:58 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
[...]
Last edited by cindytran872 on Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- donzoli
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:53 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
zizou wrote:1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago +1
6. NYU -1
7. Cal-Berkeley -1
7. Penn +1
9. Michigan
10. Virginia
11. Duke -1
11. Northwestern -1
13. Cornell
14. Georgetown
15. UCLA
15. Texas
17. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. WUSTL
20. GW +8
21. Illinois +2
22. BU -2
22. Emory -2
22. Minnesota -2
22. Notre Dame +1
26. Iowa
27. Indiana -4
28. Boston College -2
28. William & Mary
28. UC-Davis +7
28. Georgia +7
28. North Carolina +2
28. Wisconsin +7
34. Fordham -4
34. Ohio State +1
34. Washington -4
34. Washington & Lee -4
38. Arizona State +17
38. Alabama -8
37. Colorado - Boulder +8
38. Wake Forest +2
42. BYU -1
42. George Mason -1
42. Arizona +1
42. UC-Hastings -3
42. Utah +3
47. Florida +4
48. American -3
48. SMU +1
48. Tulane -3
48. Maryland -5
Tier 2
52. Pepperdine +3
52. Yeshiva -3
54. Florida State -2
54. UConn -2
56. Case Western -1
56. Loyola - CA +15
56. Cincinnati -4
56. San Diego +5
60. Georgia State +5
60. Houston -1
60. Miami +11
60. Tennessee-Knoxville -1
64. Baylor +1
64. Lewis & Clark -3
64. Kentucky -9
67. Brooklyn -6
67. Kansas -2
67. New Mexico +10
67. Pittsburgh +4
67. Villanova -6
72. Penn State -7
72. Seton Hall +5
72. St. John's +15
72. Temple -7
72. Hawai'i +28
72. Oklahoma -1
78. Loyola - Chicago +9
78. UNLV -2
80. Chicago-Kent -3
80. LSU -5
80. Rutgers-Camden -3
80. Rutgers - Newark +7
80. Denver -3
80. Oregon -3
86. Hofstra +14
86. Indiana-Indianapolis +1
86. Northeastern +8
86. Seattle -9
86. Syracuse +14
86. Arkansas-Fayeteville +8
86. Richmond -9
93. Chapman +7
93. Santa Clara -8
93. Missouri -28
93. Nebraska-Lincoln +7
93. West Virginia +7
98. Catholic -4
98. DePaul -11
98. San Fransisco
98. Pacific-McGeorge +2
98. William Mitchell +2
Someone should double check these, just did them in a rush.
I find the 28 spot interesting. You got three jumps of 7 and a 2. What gives with Wisconsin, Davis, and Georgia all jumping so much?
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I assume there is a strong self-selection bias. NU does have the reputation for older students, most of which go to law school because they want to get paid, hence BigLaw. I assume the percentage doing clerkships or public service in NU is low (correct me if I'm wrong). This contribute to low peer assessment, especially from judges. Plus, NJ250 stats does not mean good Vault 20 placement stats which I assume could make a difference in peer assessment.nycparalegal wrote:Yet it had the best placement in the NJ250 survey. Quite the paradox.DVZfan wrote:Yeah that really sucks for NU and it has not been able to really escape that for a very long time!Torvon wrote:Lol @ NU having a lower peer assessment score than GULC and Cornell
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Why did University of Richmond drop 9 spots from 77 to 86? Seems very surprising
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:12 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Nightrunner wrote:#22. I missed it in the first type-up.dreamweaver87 wrote:where's minnesota, though?
ah, looking at the scans now. thanks.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hiromoto45
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Where did UC-Irvine rank? I can't seem to find it.
- jmhendri
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:33 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Irvine's ranking is a pure estimation by TLS. It's not accredited yet.hiromoto45 wrote:Where did UC-Irvine rank? I can't seem to find it.
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Not until it's accredited. That takes several years.hiromoto45 wrote:Where did UC-Irvine rank? I can't seem to find it.
HTH for the millionth time.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:52 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Good to see Loyola-Chicago moving back up.
Wonder what the deal was with Depaul?
Wonder what the deal was with Depaul?
-
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:47 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
That's the most movement I've ever seen. I mean moving 15 or 16 spots is huge, but 28???donzoli wrote:zizou wrote:1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago +1
6. NYU -1
7. Cal-Berkeley -1
7. Penn +1
9. Michigan
10. Virginia
11. Duke -1
11. Northwestern -1
13. Cornell
14. Georgetown
15. UCLA
15. Texas
17. Vanderbilt
18. USC
19. WUSTL
20. GW +8
21. Illinois +2
22. BU -2
22. Emory -2
22. Minnesota -2
22. Notre Dame +1
26. Iowa
27. Indiana -4
28. Boston College -2
28. William & Mary
28. UC-Davis +7
28. Georgia +7
28. North Carolina +2
28. Wisconsin +7
34. Fordham -4
34. Ohio State +1
34. Washington -4
34. Washington & Lee -4
38. Arizona State +17
38. Alabama -8
37. Colorado - Boulder +8
38. Wake Forest +2
42. BYU -1
42. George Mason -1
42. Arizona +1
42. UC-Hastings -3
42. Utah +3
47. Florida +4
48. American -3
48. SMU +1
48. Tulane -3
48. Maryland -5
Tier 2
52. Pepperdine +3
52. Yeshiva -3
54. Florida State -2
54. UConn -2
56. Case Western -1
56. Loyola - CA +15
56. Cincinnati -4
56. San Diego +5
60. Georgia State +5
60. Houston -1
60. Miami +11
60. Tennessee-Knoxville -1
64. Baylor +1
64. Lewis & Clark -3
64. Kentucky -9
67. Brooklyn -6
67. Kansas -2
67. New Mexico +10
67. Pittsburgh +4
67. Villanova -6
72. Penn State -7
72. Seton Hall +5
72. St. John's +15
72. Temple -7
72. Hawai'i +28
72. Oklahoma -1
78. Loyola - Chicago +9
78. UNLV -2
80. Chicago-Kent -3
80. LSU -5
80. Rutgers-Camden -3
80. Rutgers - Newark +7
80. Denver -3
80. Oregon -3
86. Hofstra +14
86. Indiana-Indianapolis +1
86. Northeastern +8
86. Seattle -9
86. Syracuse +14
86. Arkansas-Fayeteville +8
86. Richmond -9
93. Chapman +7
93. Santa Clara -8
93. Missouri -28
93. Nebraska-Lincoln +7
93. West Virginia +7
98. Catholic -4
98. DePaul -11
98. San Fransisco
98. Pacific-McGeorge +2
98. William Mitchell +2
Someone should double check these, just did them in a rush.
I find the 28 spot interesting. You got three jumps of 7 and a 2. What gives with Wisconsin, Davis, and Georgia all jumping so much?
- quetzalcoatl
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:23 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Hawai just flew from T3 to mid T2, impressive.
Glad to see Chicago is back in its rightful place
Glad to see Chicago is back in its rightful place
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:19 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Cooley.cindytran872 wrote:Minnesota or GW?
- YCrevolution
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
http://lawfirmaddict.blogspot.com/2006/ ... ement.htmlpelmen74 wrote:I assume there is a strong self-selection bias. NU does have the reputation for older students, most of which go to law school because they want to get paid, hence BigLaw. I assume the percentage doing clerkships or public service in NU is low (correct me if I'm wrong). This contribute to low peer assessment, especially from judges. Plus, NJ250 stats does not mean good Vault 20 placement stats which I assume could make a difference in peer assessment.nycparalegal wrote:Yet it had the best placement in the NJ250 survey. Quite the paradox.DVZfan wrote:Yeah that really sucks for NU and it has not been able to really escape that for a very long time!Torvon wrote:Lol @ NU having a lower peer assessment score than GULC and Cornell
- Nicholasnickynic
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Because its a crappy school... read the tls profile... doesn't really have a lot going for it...dshirs32 wrote:Why did University of Richmond drop 9 spots from 77 to 86? Seems very surprising
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Do people who use "T10" also say "T5" instead of "T6"? BC if you're going to use completely arbitrary "round number" breaks instead of looking at the point totals, you should be consistent about it!holybartender wrote:Suddenly the crusade for the T12 strikes a pretty important string in my heart.los blancos wrote:It could be worse. You could have lost your only t10 acceptance.holybartender wrote:She deserves the credit, she sent me a bulk pdf of all of it and I separated and hosted it for her since she was at work. I'm also at work but, well, I guess that's why she's in at Columbia and I'm not.
-
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:52 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I say "T5"--but that's because I think NYU floats somewhere between CC and MVBP.rayiner wrote:Do people who use "T10" also say "T5" instead of "T6"? BC if you're going to use completely arbitrary "round number" breaks, you should be consistent about it!holybartender wrote:Suddenly the crusade for the T12 strikes a pretty important string in my heart.los blancos wrote:It could be worse. You could have lost your only t10 acceptance.holybartender wrote:She deserves the credit, she sent me a bulk pdf of all of it and I separated and hosted it for her since she was at work. I'm also at work but, well, I guess that's why she's in at Columbia and I'm not.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Always Credited
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
So is the story behind how these rankings were released. Indeed, we're actually still posting in the thread where it went down!sibley wrote:it's posted already.Doritos wrote:lolAlways Credited wrote:sibley wrote:I want to know the story behind how she got the rankings!
I want to know the story behind how you were going to sue Georgetown.
- jack duluoz
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:26 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
I see that I am making lots of assumption. Apparently they are all fantastically accurateNightrunner wrote:and BOOM goes the dynamite.rayiner wrote:http://lawfirmaddict.blogspot.com/2006/ ... ement.htmlpelmen74 wrote: I assume there is a strong self-selection bias. NU does have the reputation for older students, most of which go to law school because they want to get paid, hence BigLaw. I assume the percentage doing clerkships or public service in NU is low (correct me if I'm wrong). This contribute to low peer assessment, especially from judges. Plus, NJ250 stats does not mean good Vault 20 placement stats which I assume could make a difference in peer assessment.
- pennstatepride
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:08 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Look at the GPA/LSAT medians....no fudging necessaryjack duluoz wrote:looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Always Credited
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
Apparently every school making any sort of well deserved headway back into the rank where its nearly always been ranked fudged current data to get there.jack duluoz wrote:looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:33 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
The truth.pennstatepride wrote:Look at the GPA/LSAT medians....no fudging necessaryjack duluoz wrote:looks like GW finally learned how to fudge data.
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
oh lord am I at risk for a lawsuit now =(
- chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings Released...Seriously
The biggest losser appears to be the University of Missouri. Down 34 spots from 59 to 93!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login