Leiter faculty rankings

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
scribelaw
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm

Leiter faculty rankings

Postby scribelaw » Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:54 pm


User avatar
T14_Scholly
Posts: 416
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:46 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby T14_Scholly » Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:02 pm

--ImageRemoved--

ranovr32
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:31 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby ranovr32 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:04 pm

I like how Chicago is number 3, where it belongs on all of the rankings : )

User avatar
scribelaw
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby scribelaw » Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:07 pm

Northwestern had a good showing, especially considering NU takes an unusual approach with having a lot of PhD folks instead of lawyers.

Apparently, NU has better BigLaw placement and a stronger faculty than MVP?

User avatar
Jay-Electronica
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:39 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby Jay-Electronica » Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:16 pm

Seems that Irvine has a tremendous faculty, WOW! I was not aware

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby rayiner » Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:06 pm

Will Leiter ease up a bit on the NU trolling now? :lol:

In all seriousness, I do kind of like Leiter's methodology. Using something measurable like citations instead of just doing a survey of peoples' opinions.

86revolt
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby 86revolt » Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:02 pm

rayiner wrote:Will Leiter ease up a bit on the NU trolling now? :lol:

In all seriousness, I do kind of like Leiter's methodology. Using something measurable like citations instead of just doing a survey of peoples' opinions.


i don't get what people's problem with judge and lawyer ranking is. isn't that what ultimately gets you a job or clerkship? no employer says "oh, let's see...wow, irvine has the 9th best faculty, as measured by scholarly impact, so i'll take you." but their perception of your school does affect how likely they are to hire you.

and by the way, any ranking that puts Florida State University at 23 is very suspect.

Rawlsian
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby Rawlsian » Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:04 pm

86revolt wrote:
rayiner wrote:Will Leiter ease up a bit on the NU trolling now? :lol:

In all seriousness, I do kind of like Leiter's methodology. Using something measurable like citations instead of just doing a survey of peoples' opinions.


i don't get what people's problem with judge and lawyer ranking is. isn't that what ultimately gets you a job or clerkship? no employer says "oh, let's see...wow, irvine has the 9th best faculty, as measured by scholarly impact, so i'll take you." but their perception of your school does affect how likely they are to hire you.

and by the way, any ranking that puts Florida State University at 23 is very suspect.


Leiter's believes the judge/lawyer rep scores are unreliable because of their low response rate.

User avatar
pany1985
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:08 am

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby pany1985 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:13 pm

Ideally the quality of the faculty should be a big factor in determining a school's reputation and how employers view the school and its students, making them a measure of essentially the same thing. Of course, real world results may vary.

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby rayiner » Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:05 pm

I mean personally I think the academic ranking is pretty irrelevant, while the lawyer/judge ranking, while potentially useful, is extremely flawed. The lawyer/judge ranking has a very low response rate (~30%) and is potentially geographically-biased. Where are the lawyers/judges being surveyed? Are they in the same regions where grads are seeking work? For a school like, say, BC, where everyone goes into the Boston market, are the opinions of judges/lawyers in, say, DC, really relevant to hiring?

sumus romani
Posts: 565
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:04 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby sumus romani » Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:18 pm

Leiter suggests that Epstein is split between Chicago and NYU. But isn't he at NYU fulltime now? Lots of sources suggest this. If so, NYU should get all of his citations, which is a lot, since he is one of Chicago's stars (well, now NYU's).

Edited for typo.

User avatar
FlightoftheEarls
Posts: 857
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:50 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby FlightoftheEarls » Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:20 pm

sumus romani wrote:Leiter suggests that Epstein is split between Chicago and NYU. But isn't he at NYU fulltime now? Lots of sources suggest this. If so, NYU should get all of his citations, which is a lot, since he is one of Chicago's stars (well, now NYU's).

Edited for typo.

http://www.law.nyu.edu/news/ECM_PRO_059743

Fall 2010.

sumus romani
Posts: 565
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:04 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby sumus romani » Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:22 pm

Also, rather embarrassingly, I misread Leiter's methodology. Epstein's cite's are credited in full to both! Thanks for the heads up!

FlightoftheEarls wrote:
sumus romani wrote:Leiter suggests that Epstein is split between Chicago and NYU. But isn't he at NYU fulltime now? Lots of sources suggest this. If so, NYU should get all of his citations, which is a lot, since he is one of Chicago's stars (well, now NYU's).

Edited for typo.

http://www.law.nyu.edu/news/ECM_PRO_059743

Fall 2010.

waverider
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby waverider » Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:40 pm

86revolt wrote:
rayiner wrote:Will Leiter ease up a bit on the NU trolling now? :lol:

In all seriousness, I do kind of like Leiter's methodology. Using something measurable like citations instead of just doing a survey of peoples' opinions.


i don't get what people's problem with judge and lawyer ranking is. isn't that what ultimately gets you a job or clerkship? no employer says "oh, let's see...wow, irvine has the 9th best faculty, as measured by scholarly impact, so i'll take you." but their perception of your school does affect how likely they are to hire you.

and by the way, any ranking that puts Florida State University at 23 is very suspect.


+1

ViP
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby ViP » Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:49 pm

86revolt wrote:
rayiner wrote:Will Leiter ease up a bit on the NU trolling now? :lol:

In all seriousness, I do kind of like Leiter's methodology. Using something measurable like citations instead of just doing a survey of peoples' opinions.


i don't get what people's problem with judge and lawyer ranking is. isn't that what ultimately gets you a job or clerkship? no employer says "oh, let's see...wow, irvine has the 9th best faculty, as measured by scholarly impact, so i'll take you." but their perception of your school does affect how likely they are to hire you.

and by the way, any ranking that puts Florida State University at 23 is very suspect.


This ranking system is based on faculty scholarly impact. No offense intended by any means, but do you actually know anything about FSU's faculty? I, for one, know nothing about FSU but I'm sure Brian Leiter knows more than anyone on TLS about law school faculties.

With regard to US News' assessment by lawyers/judges... No, it's not what ultimately lands you a job. Not only are very few lawyers/judges surveyed, but very few of those surveyed actually respond. It's infinitely more useful and insightful to personally speak to lawyers (small firm, big firm, whatever) in the region(s) that you want to work. We already know more or less which schools qualify as "national," so no need to rely on US News for that.

86revolt
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby 86revolt » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:50 pm

ViP wrote:
86revolt wrote:
rayiner wrote:Will Leiter ease up a bit on the NU trolling now? :lol:

In all seriousness, I do kind of like Leiter's methodology. Using something measurable like citations instead of just doing a survey of peoples' opinions.


i don't get what people's problem with judge and lawyer ranking is. isn't that what ultimately gets you a job or clerkship? no employer says "oh, let's see...wow, irvine has the 9th best faculty, as measured by scholarly impact, so i'll take you." but their perception of your school does affect how likely they are to hire you.

and by the way, any ranking that puts Florida State University at 23 is very suspect.


This ranking system is based on faculty scholarly impact. No offense intended by any means, but do you actually know anything about FSU's faculty? I, for one, know nothing about FSU but I'm sure Brian Leiter knows more than anyone on TLS about law school faculties.

With regard to US News' assessment by lawyers/judges... No, it's not what ultimately lands you a job. Not only are very few lawyers/judges surveyed, but very few of those surveyed actually respond. It's infinitely more useful and insightful to personally speak to lawyers (small firm, big firm, whatever) in the region(s) that you want to work. We already know more or less which schools qualify as "national," so no need to rely on US News for that.


ultimately, i don't think we should rely on ranking in general, whether it be usnwr or leiter. but IF we have to rank law schools based on some arbitrary measure, i think the opinion of lawyers/judges is a better criterion than scholarly impact of the faculty. while the way that usnwr surveys the opinion of judges and lawyers is problematic, i don't think that's so much an argument against the method as it is to improve it. i agree with an earlier poster that the prestige of a school in its region should matter while also taking into account its national prestige.

td6624
Posts: 551
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:45 pm

Re: Leiter faculty rankings

Postby td6624 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:48 pm

ViP wrote:
This ranking system is based on faculty scholarly impact. No offense intended by any means, but do you actually know anything about FSU's faculty? I, for one, know nothing about FSU but I'm sure Brian Leiter knows more than anyone on TLS about law school faculties.



Srsly. The amount of semen spilled over US News by TLS could fill Lake Michigan.

Anyway

Vandy at #10. I wasn't really considering Vandy that seriously.... then I got a scholly offer and saw their NJL250 placement and now this..... I'm going to Nashville in a couple weeks and the weather will probably be 62 and sunny and I'll have the best meal of my life at some awesome restaurant and then I'll just have to sack up and send in my deposit.

Edit: That paragraph makes it sound like I was leaning toward a T14. I didn't get into any. I was leaning toward GW until a couple weeks ago. It's down to those two.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dojodawg, Specter1389, Yahoo [Bot] and 6 guests