Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby kittenmittons » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:01 pm

Desert Fox wrote:We call all agree on t13 right?


Yes

User avatar
jmaan
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby jmaan » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:03 pm

kittenmittons wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:We call all agree on t13 right?


Yes


or we can just get 12 for the price of 10

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby rayiner » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:03 pm

This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Have always been fucked.

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby 09042014 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:04 pm

rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Has always been fucked.


We've decided GVTL are more fucked that us. So we created T13.

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby kittenmittons » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:05 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Has always been fucked.


We've decided GVTL are more fucked that us. So we created T13.


Regional schools

miamiman
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby miamiman » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:06 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Has always been fucked.


We've decided GVTL are more fucked that us. So we created T13.


lol

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby rayiner » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:08 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Has always been fucked.


We've decided GVTL are more fucked that us. So we created T13.


Ask any chick: you either get good and fucked or you don't. No in-between.

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby kittenmittons » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:11 pm

rayiner wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Has always been fucked.


We've decided GVTL are more fucked that us. So we created T13.


Ask any chick: you either get good and fucked or you don't. No in-between.


You would know

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby 09042014 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:12 pm

We can all discuss this in a couple years. Look for Desert Fox on JDUnderground.

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby 09042014 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:14 pm

kittenmittons wrote:
rayiner wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Has always been fucked.


We've decided GVTL are more fucked that us. So we created T13.


Ask any chick: you either get good and fucked or you don't. No in-between.


You would know


150 Bro. You should have made a joke about Michigan students not fucking proficiently. Or about Duke students not fucking consensually.

You'll get them next time.

User avatar
swc65
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby swc65 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:20 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
showNprove wrote:When did the anti-Cornell trolling suddenly stop?


Cornell has always placed well. Its avoiding killing yourself in February in Ithica that is the problem. OCI ain't shit after that.



OMG so TRUE!!!

Some kid jumped into the gorge just last week. I have been here two years and it is the third time that has happened. What DF wrote is no joke!

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby 09042014 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:23 pm

This thread got boring when we all realized we were trolling each other for lulz.

User avatar
swc65
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby swc65 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:28 pm

I did some of the calculations with the numbers this site gave and they have listed some of the schools' %s incorrectly. I call BS on this entire list!

irishman86
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby irishman86 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:31 pm

swc65 wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
showNprove wrote:When did the anti-Cornell trolling suddenly stop?


Cornell has always placed well. Its avoiding killing yourself in February in Ithica that is the problem. OCI ain't shit after that.



OMG so TRUE!!!

Some kid jumped into the gorge just last week. I have been here two years and it is the third time that has happened. What DF wrote is no joke!


Maybe he wanted to go for a swim?

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby kittenmittons » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:32 pm

swc65 wrote:I did some of the calculations with the numbers this site gave and they have listed some of the schools' %s incorrectly. I call BS on this entire list!


viewtopic.php?f=1&t=108678

User avatar
swc65
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby swc65 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:32 pm

irishman86 wrote:
swc65 wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
showNprove wrote:When did the anti-Cornell trolling suddenly stop?


Cornell has always placed well. Its avoiding killing yourself in February in Ithica that is the problem. OCI ain't shit after that.



OMG so TRUE!!!

Some kid jumped into the gorge just last week. I have been here two years and it is the third time that has happened. What DF wrote is no joke!


Maybe he wanted to go for a swim?


Maybe. Except that he jumped from a 300ft high bridge.

User avatar
swc65
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby swc65 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:33 pm

kittenmittons wrote:
swc65 wrote:I did some of the calculations with the numbers this site gave and they have listed some of the schools' %s incorrectly. I call BS on this entire list!


viewtopic.php?f=1&t=108678



The new list too. Columbia is an entire % point off. 246/44= 55.4% not 54.4%. It just makes me wonder about the accuracy of the entire list.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby crackberry » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:43 pm

rayiner wrote:This whole thread is getting silly. The simple fact is this: you're all fucked. You can argue all you want about who out of NMVPBDNC is slightly more or less fucked, but that's just silly.

The true ranking:

YHS: Will never be fucked for the foreseeable future.
CCNMVPBDNCGVTL: Historically not fucked, but fucked now.
< T17: Have always been fucked.

WTF is "L"?

miamiman
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby miamiman » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:45 pm

ucLa, the L stands for lacking jobs apparently

showNprove
Posts: 968
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:52 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby showNprove » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:45 pm

.
Last edited by showNprove on Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby crackberry » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:48 pm

miamiman wrote:ucLa, the L stands for lacking jobs apparently

Oh, so the "L" was for Los Angeles - as in it encompassed both UCLA and USC?

User avatar
Dignan
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby Dignan » Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:48 am

Desert Fox wrote:We call all agree on t13 right?

I completely concur. The four tiers within the T13 are:

YSH
CC
NMVPB
DCG

Northwestern--with its inferior judge/lawyer scores, lousy clerkship numbers, and embarrassing placement in academia--should be in the next tier, along with UT, UCLA, and Vandy. Northwestern is a solid Top-20 school, though.

Kretzy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby Kretzy » Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:49 am

showNprove wrote:For those who are still interested in using this thread as a source of information and not a flame war, I've updated the list in the OP to properly reflect the ultimate data.

1. Stanford - 77.1%
2. Yale - 72.1%
3. Harvard - 65.7%
4. Virginia - 65.2%
5. Michigan - 64.9%
6. Columbia - 64.0%
7. Chicago - 63.1%
8. Northwestern - 62.7%
9. Penn - 61.7%
10. Duke - 61.5%
11. Berkeley - 58.1%
12. NYU - 57.4%
13. Vanderbilt - 55.0%
14. Cornell - 52.4%
15. Georgetown - 48.4%
16. Texas - 47.5%
17. USC - 47.2%
18. UCLA - 41.9%
19. Boston College - 38.0%
20. Notre Dame - 37.8%


SYH, FTW :D

User avatar
dbt
Posts: 617
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:46 am

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby dbt » Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:03 am

looks like I picked the wrong school!!!!

:roll:

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28143
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Top Placing Classes (NLJ250 and Federal Clerkships)

Postby Kronk » Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:04 am

dbt wrote:looks like I picked the wrong school!!!!

:roll:


Those Harvard grads better look out, Virginia's comin'!




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 5 guests