Page 1 of 1

yrrjy

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:21 pm
by phillbert0087
ryjr

Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:27 pm
by nsideirish
Are you saying that Illinois is giving you 10k a year or that it will cost you 10k a year? And same question for the other schools.

Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:29 pm
by Joga Bonito
phillbert0087 wrote:Just seeing what you all think. Illinois (10k a year), Cardozo (40k a year) or GW (35k a year). I am a little unsure about what kind of law to practice but I am leaning toward International, Constitutional or PI... and I don't mind if I go Big Law or not... just want enough money to maintain my family and goo employment prospects, hopefully nationwide.

Let me know what you think... every comment is helpful! I am still waiting on some more law schools, this are just top 3 as of now.


GW & DC all they way for this. Plus GW will have the best placement nationwide but then there are like 500 something people in a first year class too so I don't know.

Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:43 pm
by phillbert0087
The figures are the scholarships awarded. Thanks for pointing that out!

Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:45 pm
by Blindmelon
The cheaper between UIUC and GW.

Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:48 pm
by Great Satchmo
If GW is offering $35k a year, I'd definitely go that direction.