beef wellington wrote:
True, I misspoke when I said it was the same for everyone. But his poverty level is not going to change according to what school he goes to or how much debt he has, which was my original point, one you've yet to rebut but oddly won't concede.
I don't think the point of contention was if his poverty level would change according to what school he goes to. The point of contention were if the payment amounts would change, depending on debt.
Michigan's LRAP is basically useless for a single person making more than $40k/yr. GULC's is so good you might never pay a dime for law school. But you're going with Michigan for the "flexibility" in being able to choose non-PI, horribly-compensated jobs. Different strokes I guess.
Michigan's LRAP's expected contribution over the base is only 35% times AAI. So if you were to make 41k, you would only contribute $145 a month according to LRAP. If you benefit from IBR at the same time at another income level, it is probable that you wouldn't pay anything at all.
GULC's LRAP is functionally only available to those who graduate in the top 1/3 of the class ITE. If you don't obtain one of the two types of jobs, you can't even use LRAP.
I have no intention of pursuing government or PI and never had an interest in it. (I wouldn't pursue a field that on average pays 15k less than the starting salary of graduates in my major at my undergrad.)
You make a good point though. I guess the top 1/3 of the class at Georgetown can look forward to using the LRAP if they choose to, while the other 2/3, who are probably going to have to pursue "non-PI, horribly compensated jobs" are going to wish GULC's LRAP were not limited to only 2 types of jobs while they make full, monthly payments of $1500+ a month on loans. (And yes, IBR may potentially help limit payments, but this person wouldn't be qualified to have loans disposed of after 10 years.) GULC's limiting LRAP itself isn't much of a benefit for most, while graduates of any school are qualified to use IBR.