Are Public Law schools more competitive Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
vtoodler

Bronze
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:19 pm

Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by vtoodler » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:20 am

Are public law schools more competitive to get into than private ones? They have lower tuition rates?

User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by Bronte » Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:15 am

Tuition differences are often negligible, especially out-of-state. Relative selectivity follows the rankings closely (but not perfectly). The University of Virginia (public) is significantly more difficult to get into than Boston College (private). The University of Chicago (private) is significantly more difficult to get into than the University of Texas (public).

User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8953
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by vanwinkle » Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:17 am

Bronte wrote:Tuition differences are often negligible, especially out-of-state. Relative selectivity follows the rankings closely (but not perfectly). The University of Virginia (public) is significantly more difficult to get into than Boston College (private). The University of Chicago (private) is significantly more difficult to get into than the University of Texas (public).
TITCR. There's a pretty direct correlation between school ranking and difficulty of admission. A higher-ranked school will in general be more competitive than a lower-ranked school, regardless of whether the schools being compared are public or private.

ScaredWorkedBored

Bronze
Posts: 409
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by ScaredWorkedBored » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:20 am

Bronte wrote:Tuition differences are often negligible, especially out-of-state. Relative selectivity follows the rankings closely (but not perfectly). The University of Virginia (public) is significantly more difficult to get into than Boston College (private). The University of Chicago (private) is significantly more difficult to get into than the University of Texas (public).
Not good examples unless you are talking about the raw GPA/LSAT numbers required. For someone with school-competitive numbers, Virgnia is easier than BC and while Chicago is harder than Texas, Texas still rejects almost 8/10 applicants - much worse if you are out of state because of their hard quota.

Boston College had 6321 applications & 1224 admissions last year. ~ 19% acceptance rate.
Virginia had 4869 applications & 1225 admissions last year. ~ 25% acceptance rate.

Chicago had 4818 applications & 766 admissions last year. ~ 16% acceptance rate
Texas had 4999 applications & 1085 admissions last year. ~ 22% acceptance rate.

Virgina is also only nominally public and neither Texas nor Virginia is a real good example of a public school.

Flanker1067

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by Flanker1067 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:25 am

^^^ I didn't do all the fact checking because who cares, but taht guy doesn't know what hes talking about. UVA had almost 8000 apps last year.... http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/prospe ... lass12.htm

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


ScaredWorkedBored

Bronze
Posts: 409
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by ScaredWorkedBored » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:34 am

Flanker1067 wrote:^^^ I didn't do all the fact checking because who cares, but taht guy doesn't know what hes talking about. UVA had almost 8000 apps last year.... http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/prospe ... lass12.htm
I took all sets of numbers from LSN; any undercounting by LSN of numbers of applicants should be reasonably common.

User avatar
AngryAvocado

Silver
Posts: 774
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by AngryAvocado » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:39 am

ScaredWorkedBored wrote:
Bronte wrote:Tuition differences are often negligible, especially out-of-state. Relative selectivity follows the rankings closely (but not perfectly). The University of Virginia (public) is significantly more difficult to get into than Boston College (private). The University of Chicago (private) is significantly more difficult to get into than the University of Texas (public).
Not good examples unless you are talking about the raw GPA/LSAT numbers required. For someone with school-competitive numbers, Virgnia is easier than BC and while Chicago is harder than Texas, Texas still rejects almost 8/10 applicants - much worse if you are out of state because of their hard quota.

Boston College had 6321 applications & 1224 admissions last year. ~ 19% acceptance rate.
Virginia had 4869 applications & 1225 admissions last year. ~ 25% acceptance rate.

Chicago had 4818 applications & 766 admissions last year. ~ 16% acceptance rate
Texas had 4999 applications & 1085 admissions last year. ~ 22% acceptance rate.

Virgina is also only nominally public and neither Texas nor Virginia is a real good example of a public school.
What else would he be talking about?

Rawlsian

Bronze
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by Rawlsian » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:51 am

ScaredWorkedBored wrote:
Bronte wrote:Tuition differences are often negligible, especially out-of-state. Relative selectivity follows the rankings closely (but not perfectly). The University of Virginia (public) is significantly more difficult to get into than Boston College (private). The University of Chicago (private) is significantly more difficult to get into than the University of Texas (public).
Not good examples unless you are talking about the raw GPA/LSAT numbers required. For someone with school-competitive numbers, Virgnia is easier than BC and while Chicago is harder than Texas, Texas still rejects almost 8/10 applicants - much worse if you are out of state because of their hard quota.

Boston College had 6321 applications & 1224 admissions last year. ~ 19% acceptance rate.
Virginia had 4869 applications & 1225 admissions last year. ~ 25% acceptance rate.

Chicago had 4818 applications & 766 admissions last year. ~ 16% acceptance rate
Texas had 4999 applications & 1085 admissions last year. ~ 22% acceptance rate.

Virgina is also only nominally public and neither Texas nor Virginia is a real good example of a public school.
Do you mean someone with competitive numbers for Virginia, BC? Because obviously someone competitive at UVA will not have much trouble getting into BC, while someone at the medians at BC will need some significant help to get into UVA. If you mean for the average median candidate for each school...well, I don't need to go into that. Many applicants not competitive will not apply to schools with more difficult admission standards.

Flanker1067

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Are Public Law schools more competitive

Post by Flanker1067 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:03 am

While I agree about the difficulty staying close to the rankings, I think the real answer to this question is probably yes. According to the article on TLS on UVA, they had 7000 out of state apps for about 240 seats and 800 in state apps for about 160 seats. So that suggests that if you are out of state, its harder to get into then peer private schools, and vice versa for in-state. I believe the leaning is even more intense for Texas and anecdotally I have seen alot of rejects on LSN who then got accepted to Chicago/Berkeley/NYU.

Edit: I just realized Berk was a terrible example there, being public itself. I think you get the point though.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”