Law Review Rankings

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
Kronk

Diamond
Posts: 32987
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Law Review Rankings

Postby Kronk » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:03 pm

Just thought this was sort of interesting. Clearly, the HLR is #1. I thought it was interesting that Chicago's was so low (relative to how good the school is).

http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/index.aspx

Edit: To see the rankings, click the "2008" box under the "Combined" column and then hit submit.

User avatar
dextermorgan

Silver
Posts: 1134
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:37 am

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby dextermorgan » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:17 pm

VoidSix wrote:Just thought this was sort of interesting. Clearly, the HLR is #1. I thought it was interesting that Chicago's was so low (relative to how good the school is).

http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/index.aspx

Edit: To see the rankings, click the "2008" box under the "Combined" column and then hit submit.

So much for that academic focus.

User avatar
Kronk

Diamond
Posts: 32987
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby Kronk » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:18 pm

dextermorgan wrote:
VoidSix wrote:Just thought this was sort of interesting. Clearly, the HLR is #1. I thought it was interesting that Chicago's was so low (relative to how good the school is).

http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/index.aspx

Edit: To see the rankings, click the "2008" box under the "Combined" column and then hit submit.

So much for that academic focus.


No kidding. I thought that was really surprising. Not to mention that their faculty is 2nd in citations (according to Leiter). Would've thought it'd be one of the best law reviews.

timertimer61

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:31 am

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby timertimer61 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:20 pm

was surprised to see fordham law review so high up there.

User avatar
OperaSoprano

Gold
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby OperaSoprano » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:28 pm

timertimer61 wrote:was surprised to see fordham law review so high up there.


I knew it was well respected, but very happy to see that.

User avatar
Kronk

Diamond
Posts: 32987
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby Kronk » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:29 pm

OperaSoprano wrote:
timertimer61 wrote:was surprised to see fordham law review so high up there.


I knew it was well respected, but very happy to see that.


OS, do you get an email alert everyone types "Fordham?" ;)

acdisagod

Bronze
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby acdisagod » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:29 pm

Cooley is 547th, surprising that a top school has such a low ranking law review.

Renzo

Gold
Posts: 4254
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby Renzo » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:30 pm

Wow, do people loooooove making lists.

User avatar
soullesswonder

Silver
Posts: 552
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby soullesswonder » Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:04 pm

Harvard has five secondary journals in the top 50 :shock:

User avatar
ravens20

Bronze
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby ravens20 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:05 pm

Chicago, Michigan, and Duke with surprisingly poor showings.
Texas and Fordham with surprisingly strong showings.

User avatar
OperaSoprano

Gold
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby OperaSoprano » Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:12 pm

VoidSix wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:
timertimer61 wrote:was surprised to see fordham law review so high up there.


I knew it was well respected, but very happy to see that.


OS, do you get an email alert everyone types "Fordham?" ;)


Lol, no, but I was trained in school trolling by Observationalist, so I've picked up a few of his tricks.

User avatar
soullesswonder

Silver
Posts: 552
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby soullesswonder » Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:16 pm

ravens20 wrote:Chicago, Michigan, and Duke with surprisingly poor showings.
Texas and Fordham with surprisingly strong showings.


In Chicago's defense, I noticed it is the only school besides Harvard to have two journals in the top 25 (Supreme Court Review + UC LR)

User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1824
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby ggocat » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:16 am

VoidSix wrote:Just thought this was sort of interesting. Clearly, the HLR is #1. I thought it was interesting that Chicago's was so low (relative to how good the school is).

http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/index.aspx

Edit: To see the rankings, click the "2008" box under the "Combined" column and then hit submit.

It's a little more complicated.

HLR is not "clearly" #1. HLR is #1 if you use the default IF of 0.33, which the authors selected "because that weighting gives Harvard the highest combined-rank over each of 13 ranking surveys." http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/method.asp#combinedscore.

If you weight the IF at 0.577---the number used by another prominent ranking, see generally Ronen Perry, The Relative Value of American Law Reviews, 39 Conn. L. Rev. 1 (2006)---then YLJ is #1 in the W&L rankings. But YLJ and HLR often exchange the #1 spot.

It should be noted that the lower the IF factor, the greater W&L rises in the rankings: #59 with IF 0.000, #74 with IF 0.333, #85 with IF 0.577, and #105 with IF 1.000. In some disciplines, journals are ranked solely based on IF. So the lessening of the importance of the IF (and the relative benefit W&L receives by doing so) may be a valid criticism of the W&L rankings.

User avatar
Kronk

Diamond
Posts: 32987
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby Kronk » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:18 am

ggocat wrote:
VoidSix wrote:Just thought this was sort of interesting. Clearly, the HLR is #1. I thought it was interesting that Chicago's was so low (relative to how good the school is).

http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/index.aspx

Edit: To see the rankings, click the "2008" box under the "Combined" column and then hit submit.

It's a little more complicated.

HLR is not "clearly" #1. HLR is #1 if you use the default IF of 0.33, which the authors selected "because that weighting gives Harvard the highest combined-rank over each of 13 ranking surveys." http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/method.asp#combinedscore.

If you weight the IF at 0.577---the number used by another prominent ranking, see generally Ronen Perry, The Relative Value of American Law Reviews, 39 Conn. L. Rev. 1 (2006)---then YLJ is #1 in the W&L rankings. But YLJ and HLR often exchange the #1 spot.

It should be noted that the lower the IF factor, the greater W&L rises in the rankings: #59 with IF 0.000, #74 with IF 0.333, #85 with IF 0.577, and #105 with IF 1.000. In some disciplines, journals are ranked solely based on IF. So the lessening of the importance of the IF (and the relative benefit W&L receives by doing so) may be a valid criticism of the W&L rankings.



Good to know. Thanks.

I just said HLR was #1 because I have read the HLR and seen articles from it far more often than any other law journal.

User avatar
jrobby6

Bronze
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:25 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby jrobby6 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:23 am

wait, how do you determine rankings? by how many times its cited?

User avatar
ravens20

Bronze
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby ravens20 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:24 am

soullesswonder wrote:
ravens20 wrote:Chicago, Michigan, and Duke with surprisingly poor showings.
Texas and Fordham with surprisingly strong showings.


In Chicago's defense, I noticed it is the only school besides Harvard to have two journals in the top 25 (Supreme Court Review + UC LR)


True that's def. a good point.

User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1824
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby ggocat » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:25 am

VoidSix wrote:Good to know. Thanks.

I just said HLR was #1 because I have read the HLR and seen articles from it far more often than any other law journal.

No prob. I suspect HLR publishes many more articles than YLJ because, despite surpassing YLJ by about 1000-2000 citations per year, HLR has a lower IF.

I think we can make some decent generalizations from these rankings, but much like other rankings (*cough* Cooley *cough*), you can make rankings say what you want them to say by altering the weight of the variables or altering the variables themselves.

User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1824
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby ggocat » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:26 am

jrobby6 wrote:wait, how do you determine rankings? by how many times its cited?

W&L ranking methodology: http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/method.asp#methodology.

In short, a combination of total number of cites and the impact factor. Impact factor is described here: http://lawlib.wlu.edu/LJ/method.asp#impactfactor. It's basically a ratio of cites to number of articles published.

User avatar
Maven

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:21 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby Maven » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:24 am

Who the hell reads law reviews!

User avatar
thesealocust

Platinum
Posts: 8523
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby thesealocust » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:48 am

edit: never mind
Last edited by thesealocust on Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Maven

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:21 pm

Re: Law Review Rankings

Postby Maven » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:56 am

Law Reviews are just not as relevant as they were 20 years ago. Law Professors may read them but I seriously doubt that most Judges do. LRs importance is tied to the prestiege associated with being an editor.



Return to “Choosing a Law School�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests