What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
blahblewblah
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:42 pm

Re: What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

Postby blahblewblah » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:53 pm

.
Last edited by blahblewblah on Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

LSATfromNC
Posts: 735
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm

Re: What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

Postby LSATfromNC » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:05 pm

Luckily you don't have to deal with the admissions office once you are a student. At the Wake Scholars day a 3L said he withdrew his application after meeting with their admissions staff because they were rude to him, so that appears to be a common theme. Then again I would get annoyed if 4,000 0L's were pestering me about getting 1 of 250 seats, yet other admissions offices are nicer than Santa Claus (Wake and Alabama!).

nycparalegal
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:26 am

Re: What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

Postby nycparalegal » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:22 pm

showNprove wrote:
ScaredWorkedBored wrote:
showNprove wrote:UNC's ranking does not reflect its reputation because its admissions office is incompetent. It really should be a solid Top 25 school, but not unless things change at admissions.


Hard to be "competent" when you're controlled by the state legislature to such a massive extent.

The only state school that can get away with a 60%+ quota is Texas. Being the size of several states helps in that respect.

I'm not talking about in-state quotas. The state legislature has nothing to do with UNC Law's slow-ass admissions, sporadic acceptances, and lack of a definitive strategy to secure top-quality students. Honestly, I think I could make UNC a top 25 school after one cycle. The holes in what they're doing are so apparent, and there is no explanation for why they are so deficient in that regard.

The state's power over the school has a lot of negative effects, but the poor performance of the admissions office is not one of them.


Really? What is your recommendation?

showNprove
Posts: 968
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:52 pm

Re: What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

Postby showNprove » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:47 pm

.
Last edited by showNprove on Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Zannie1986
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:43 pm

Re: What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

Postby Zannie1986 » Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:38 pm

anyone know if it's an e-deposit or deposit by mail?

User avatar
Schrute Farms Beets
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:44 am

Re: What is the general view of UNC law on TLS?

Postby Schrute Farms Beets » Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:43 pm

Zannie1986 wrote:anyone know if it's an e-deposit or deposit by mail?


Deposit by mail with a blue card you should have received via snail mail.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: carlos_danger, derekne and 1 guest