Welcome to my profile, OP!

That was pretty low ball.

Snitching is way more douchey than the OP's question and subsequent replies.



Edit: clarity

I would do horribly in prison because I would snitch on everyone.

Snitching is so lame. OP is lame, but I hope the guy who emailed the school has a horrendous cycle.

OP, I would make sure none of your previous posts or LSN don't have any revealing info.

I sent this just a minute ago:


Greetings!

I have not applied for admission to Loyola, but I thought you might be interested to know about the integrity of one of your recent ED admits. While I don't know this person, they had a rather interesting post on Top-Law-Schools.com that you should be aware of:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=99112

Thank you, and I hope you have a great day!

Wow. I think the OP deserves much of the criticism that he or she is getting in this thread, but the above email, if actually sent, is just about the worst thing I have seen on TLS. Everyone has the right to be anonymous on here. The members of the TLS community should respect that anonymity. No one should ever go out of their way, as the above poster does, to reveal someone else's identify to an admissions office.

Were I a moderator, I would ban FacistCommunist from this forum.

If I'm dumb enough to not hide my identifying information on an internet message board, and I solicit opinions on the ramifications of breaking a contract with my first choice law school, what is the worst that could happen?

You really aren't one to comment on lameness.

OP should add another question to his (I assume chicks aren't this retarded) post.

Wow. I think the OP deserves much of the criticism that he or she is getting in this thread, but the above email, if actually sent, is just about the worst thing I have seen on TLS. Everyone has the right to be anonymous on here. The members of the TLS community should respect that anonymity. No one should ever go out of their way, as the above poster does, to reveal someone else's identify to an admissions office.

Were I a moderator, I would ban FacistCommunist from this forum.

Snitching is so lame. OP is lame, but I hope the guy who emailed the school has a horrendous cycle.

OP, I would make sure none of your previous posts or LSN don't have any revealing info.

Well the guy's name is FacistCommunist so I guess he just informed to the KGESTAPO

+1. Snitching and not wanting to withdraw from other schools after binding ED acceptance, "worst. thread. ever."

"Snitching"? Seriously? What are you, a criminal?

FC jumped the gun, assuming he/she actually sent it in and isn't just trying to scare the OP. And the letter has pre-schadenfreude written all over it. But the rush to condemn the OP rather than inform and persuade is jumping the gun as well. This could have played out without incident and drama if you guys had simply cited the ED contract and argued why paying the application fee at other schools does not entitle one to a decision given that contract, and pointed out that schools trade enough information to put the OP in danger of being recognized as violating that contract. Then you put the moral cherry on top by explaining how violating the contract negatively affects others.

Rushing to condemn and creating drama just wastes everybody's time. You might have succeeded in scaring the OP into compliance, but you'll only have made him/her more belligerent, while needlessly attracting a crowd chanting "OMG, what a retarded douche!"

"Snitching"? Seriously? What are you, a criminal?

FC jumped the gun, assuming he/she actually sent it in and isn't just trying to scare the OP. And the letter has pre-schadenfreude written all over it. But the rush to condemn the OP rather than inform and persuade is jumping the gun as well. This could have played out without incident and drama if you guys had simply cited the ED contract and argued why paying the application fee at other schools does not entitle one to a decision given that contract, and pointed out that schools trade enough information to put the OP in danger of being recognized as violating that contract. Then you put the moral cherry on top by explaining how violating the contract negatively affects others.

Rushing to condemn and creating drama just wastes everybody's time. You might have succeeded in scaring the OP into compliance, but you'll only have made him/her more belligerent, while needlessly attracting a crowd chanting "OMG, what a retarded douche!"

"Snitching"? Seriously? What are you, a criminal?

FC jumped the gun, assuming he/she actually sent it in and isn't just trying to scare the OP. And the letter has pre-schadenfreude written all over it. But the rush to condemn the OP rather than inform and persuade is jumping the gun as well. This could have played out without incident and drama if you guys had simply cited the ED contract and argued why paying the application fee at other schools does not entitle one to a decision given that contract, and pointed out that schools trade enough information to put the OP in danger of being recognized as violating that contract. Then you put the moral cherry on top by explaining how violating the contract negatively affects others.

Rushing to condemn and creating drama just wastes everybody's time. You might have succeeded in scaring the OP into compliance, but you'll only have made him/her more belligerent, while needlessly attracting a crowd chanting "OMG, what a retarded douche!"

Emailing the school was lame, but fwiw, I doubt this applicant would get kicked out for asking a "what if" question. I'm sure many ED applicants wonder the same thing, and I bet the LS has better things to do than to track down some kid on a message board because of his thought crime.

That being said, I do agree with everyone else that this isn't the right thing to do. For me, that would be more than enough, and I would withdraw my applications elsewhere.

In addition, it seems pretty clear that the best case scenario is that you find out what would have happened with other schools and you could imagine a what-if scenario with no basis in reality. The worst is that by violating your ED contract, get your admission revoked, and possibly don't gain admission anywhere else as a result. It appears they could find out because law school admissions personnel do talk to each other, as pointed out earlier. I agree that it might not happen, but certainly, there is a risk.

A simple cost/benefit analysis should assist you in just being happy you're in at your #1 and withdrawing your applications!! Check out lawschoolpredictor.com to get a sense of what might have happened instead.