Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Archives Index     Forum Archives Search     Leave Archives and Visit Active TLS Forums


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:28 pm 

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Archived Posts: 1
rc


Last edited by lsatattack on Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:32 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:40 am
Archived Posts: 171
I feel like the ultimatum game would have been an easy 5-6 questions (whatever it was) If I had longer than 6 minutes to complete it because of fucking invisible sculptures.

Doing the math out now, I recall finishing the first two passages in ~16 minutes, and having 5 minutes called on the last paragraph of the passage...which i rushed. That leaves about 13 minutes on the sculptor...wtf was i thinking.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:34 pm 

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm
Archived Posts: 88
Does anyone remember what they picked on the second question in the ultimatum game?...Something like the ultimatum game is an example of:....I picked the answer that said something like, a situation where the results are unpredictable.

Is that the credited response?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:35 pm 

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Archived Posts: 253
-


Last edited by charlesjd on Sat Dec 05, 2009 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:37 pm 

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm
Archived Posts: 88
charlesjd wrote:
scribelaw wrote:
Does anyone remember what they picked on the second question in the ultimatum game?...Something like the ultimatum game is an example of:....I picked the answer that said something like, a situation where the results are unpredictable.

Is that the credited response?


I remember i came down to that and another but didnt chose it because it was predictable.


LOL.

well, not entirely. the passage said two-thirds offer 40-50 percent, which means a fair number go off the reservation.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:40 pm 

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:41 pm
Archived Posts: 37
dude, I feel you. I took forever on the first two passages and ended up with ten minutes to finish the last two, which I just barely did. I can't even remember what the ultimatum game was about right now because I went through it so fast. I'm kicking myself now for not pacing my time better.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:41 pm 

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Archived Posts: 253
I agree it was not exactly 100% predictable, however when you got to the end of the passage, it inferred that it was predictable to an extent. Also, what constitute predictable? Hard to say man.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:41 pm 

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Archived Posts: 643
scribelaw wrote:

LOL.

well, not entirely. the passage said two-thirds offer 40-50 percent, which means a fair number go off the reservation.


I'm sorry mate... it's not the unpredictable answer... the passage says it DEFIES intuition... not prediction :?
I'm unsure what I put here:
I think it was like "The ultimatum game helps prove that human beings are not always self-interested, but sometimes interested in self-esteem"


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:42 pm 

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Archived Posts: 253
HelperMonkey wrote:
scribelaw wrote:

LOL.

well, not entirely. the passage said two-thirds offer 40-50 percent, which means a fair number go off the reservation.


I'm sorry mate... it's not the unpredictable answer... the passage says it DEFIES intuition... not prediction :?
I'm unsure what I put here:
I think it was like "The ultimatum game helps prove that human beings are not always self-interested, but sometimes interested in self-esteem"


Bingo was his nameo.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:42 pm 

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm
Archived Posts: 88
HelperMonkey wrote:
scribelaw wrote:

LOL.

well, not entirely. the passage said two-thirds offer 40-50 percent, which means a fair number go off the reservation.


I'm sorry mate... it's not the unpredictable answer... the passage says it DEFIES intuition... not prediction :?
I'm unsure what I put here:
I think it was like "The ultimatum game helps prove that human beings are not always self-interested, but sometimes interested in self-esteem"


Damn. That answer sounds perfect -- I don't even remember that being among the choices. Guess I F-ed that one up.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 7:36 pm 
Lord Protector of the Forums and Board

Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am
Archived Posts: 3285
Please remember not to specifically discuss questions/answers. If in doubt, don't do it. More explicitly, if you do it, you will be banned.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:18 pm 

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:56 pm
Archived Posts: 15
hey lsac you can juss take yer ultimatum and **hiccup** shove it.

http://www.nytimes.com/projects/magazin ... _science-5

Revenge is TCR.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 3:26 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:20 pm
Archived Posts: 254
HelperMonkey wrote:
scribelaw wrote:

LOL.

well, not entirely. the passage said two-thirds offer 40-50 percent, which means a fair number go off the reservation.


I'm sorry mate... it's not the unpredictable answer... the passage says it DEFIES intuition... not prediction :?
I'm unsure what I put here:
I think it was like "The ultimatum game helps prove that human beings are not always self-interested, but sometimes interested in self-esteem"


+1


But do you remember a question from the ult game that was odd, or made you feel like you missed the point of something converyed in the passage?... I can't remember what the question was about, but I want to say it was maybe the 3rd or 4th question?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:12 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:53 pm
Archived Posts: 26
I think I put unpredictable too, and then there was another question (I think it was the fourth question) that mentioned something about the game being unpredictable so I figured that I had put the right answer. For the last two questions, was the answer for one of them talking about how the theory that the author was against doesn't explain why people reject unfair offers, and then another one had the opposite answer about how the self-esteem theory explains why people make fair offers and not just why reject unfair ones


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:18 pm 

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Archived Posts: 1060
the passage never said that behavior in the ultimatum game was "unpredictable," just that results were counter intuitive to standard economic theory.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: RC
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:25 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:53 pm
Archived Posts: 26
it was not explicitly stated, it might be the wrong answer but I don't think that the self-esteem answer is the right one either, because the question asked about the ultimatum game itself, and the self-esteem explanation is given as a possible theory to explain the game, the author says that it is a better theory than that other one. The self-esteem answer implies that the passage conclusively proved that self-esteem explains the ultimatum game


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Princeton Review LSAT







copyright 2003-2010 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBBContact TLS