Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Archives Index     Forum Archives Search     Leave Archives and Visit Active TLS Forums


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:01 am 

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:34 pm
Archived Posts: 25
i sat in on civil procedure and criminal law. met a nice student who let me look at her reading and notes and reassured me not to be scared off by civil procedure.....


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:07 am 

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Archived Posts: 61
I live just south of Albuquerque in El Paso, TX, but I have family that lives up there. We have great weather too-January has been in the 70s, except for today, which was a little cold and rainy. Anyways, I hope your trip had a positive impact on the Admissions Committee's decision. In my opinion making a trip all the way out there signifies how enthusiastic and motivated you are about attending the Law School so hopefully they saw that too. Was it as cold up there as everybody says? I am sure that I am going to freeze in Ithaca; I get cold when it's 65 degrees here!

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you! :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:39 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:28 am
Archived Posts: 2422
Lisa7n99 wrote:
either way, I'm on "hold" and gonna fly to Ithaca this week to sit in on a class, meet with admissions staff, etc. i will let anyone interested know how it went.

ps; is Ithaca (Cornell) really hurting for minorities? they list 23 percent on their class statistics.

cornell has already accepted a 151 this cycle, so you may get in


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:48 pm 

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:15 pm
Archived Posts: 139
Lisa7n99 wrote:
hmm....maybe you should take a look at my application. there's a few good tidbits in there other than the "Chicano/Mexican" box. lol.


I'm sure there are. Many people would consider you to be an applicant worth admitting based on your 150/3.XX GPA, life experience, and demonstrated goodness.

However, to get into a top school like Cornell, you need numbers, period. (OR, you need a "racial advantage" -- sorry, but that's what it is.)

I can guarantee you, there will NEVER, EVER be a white man (or woman) who gets into Cornell with a 150. It just won't happen excepting cases of Nobel Prize winners (who would likely pull a 170 anyhow!) or a famous writer (like the Prozac Nation lady with a 160+) . (If someone finds a case of a white guy with not incredible experience getting in, it's either BS or a massive exception. However you'll find a few 150 LSAT black/latino men and women who scrape in.)

So, regardless of the details of their early decision program, the only reason you have a single prayer of getting into Cornell is because of your "race". (Of course, your other attributes will make a difference, HOWEVER, as mallard pointed out, URM status [particularly black or latino status] is a necessary [but not sufficient] condition for acceptance with a 150 LSAT.)

If you don't want it to be the only reason you get into Cornell, cease checking boxes on applications of all kinds that indicate you are a minority.

Such boxes are used for one thing and one thing only: racism -- the making of decisions based on race. Being perfectly honest, however, if I was you, I'd still use my race to my advantage, sad as it is to have to be truly honest with oneself about what is happening. (I.e. for you to be admitted, someone else is rejected. Someone else was rejected for being white, just as in other situations in life a latina woman may be rejected for being latina. It's the flip side of your acceptance. It's racism.)

That said, good luck to you, it sounds like you're worthy of admission based on what I consider to be better measures (e.g. community service, etc.) Consider taking the LSAT again if you don't get into a good law school. Waiting one year may be less than ideal, but going to Cornell one year later beats going to a much poorer school right now. I'm sure you're capable of getting at least another 5 points, so consider a class. With a 160 you could get into even better schools, check out law school numbers and look for the URMs.

Good luck, and definitely do all the follow-up activities you mentioned.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:07 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:50 pm
Archived Posts: 1113
Edit: nvm


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:20 pm 

Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:00 pm
Archived Posts: 325
this topic seems unreal


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:56 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:51 pm
Archived Posts: 541
pretzellogic wrote:
Lisa7n99 wrote:
hmm....maybe you should take a look at my application. there's a few good tidbits in there other than the "Chicano/Mexican" box. lol.


I'm sure there are. Many people would consider you to be an applicant worth admitting based on your 150/3.XX GPA, life experience, and demonstrated goodness.

However, to get into a top school like Cornell, you need numbers, period. (OR, you need a "racial advantage" -- sorry, but that's what it is.)

I can guarantee you, there will NEVER, EVER be a white man (or woman) who gets into Cornell with a 150. It just won't happen excepting cases of Nobel Prize winners (who would likely pull a 170 anyhow!) or a famous writer (like the Prozac Nation lady with a 160+) . (If someone finds a case of a white guy with not incredible experience getting in, it's either BS or a massive exception. However you'll find a few 150 LSAT black/latino men and women who scrape in.)

So, regardless of the details of their early decision program, the only reason you have a single prayer of getting into Cornell is because of your "race". (Of course, your other attributes will make a difference, HOWEVER, as mallard pointed out, URM status [particularly black or latino status] is a necessary [but not sufficient] condition for acceptance with a 150 LSAT.)

If you don't want it to be the only reason you get into Cornell, cease checking boxes on applications of all kinds that indicate you are a minority.

Such boxes are used for one thing and one thing only: racism -- the making of decisions based on race. Being perfectly honest, however, if I was you, I'd still use my race to my advantage, sad as it is to have to be truly honest with oneself about what is happening. (I.e. for you to be admitted, someone else is rejected. Someone else was rejected for being white, just as in other situations in life a latina woman may be rejected for being latina. It's the flip side of your acceptance. It's racism.)

That said, good luck to you, it sounds like you're worthy of admission based on what I consider to be better measures (e.g. community service, etc.) Consider taking the LSAT again if you don't get into a good law school. Waiting one year may be less than ideal, but going to Cornell one year later beats going to a much poorer school right now. I'm sure you're capable of getting at least another 5 points, so consider a class. With a 160 you could get into even better schools, check out law school numbers and look for the URMs.

Good luck, and definitely do all the follow-up activities you mentioned.


Not true... White legacies would get in with a 150... Trust me on that... If you're a Kennedy, Bush, Biden, Clinton, Rockerfeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Morgan, Roosevelt and the list goes on... You would get in... Without a doubt... Quit the bitching... For the couple of URMs that get in with a lower score... I bet there are twice as many white legacies getting in...

[If you're curious... No, I am not a URM.]


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:32 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm
Archived Posts: 1396
KosovasLostSon wrote:
pretzellogic wrote:
Lisa7n99 wrote:
hmm....maybe you should take a look at my application. there's a few good tidbits in there other than the "Chicano/Mexican" box. lol.


I'm sure there are. Many people would consider you to be an applicant worth admitting based on your 150/3.XX GPA, life experience, and demonstrated goodness.

However, to get into a top school like Cornell, you need numbers, period. (OR, you need a "racial advantage" -- sorry, but that's what it is.)

I can guarantee you, there will NEVER, EVER be a white man (or woman) who gets into Cornell with a 150. It just won't happen excepting cases of Nobel Prize winners (who would likely pull a 170 anyhow!) or a famous writer (like the Prozac Nation lady with a 160+) . (If someone finds a case of a white guy with not incredible experience getting in, it's either BS or a massive exception. However you'll find a few 150 LSAT black/latino men and women who scrape in.)

So, regardless of the details of their early decision program, the only reason you have a single prayer of getting into Cornell is because of your "race". (Of course, your other attributes will make a difference, HOWEVER, as mallard pointed out, URM status [particularly black or latino status] is a necessary [but not sufficient] condition for acceptance with a 150 LSAT.)

If you don't want it to be the only reason you get into Cornell, cease checking boxes on applications of all kinds that indicate you are a minority.

Such boxes are used for one thing and one thing only: racism -- the making of decisions based on race. Being perfectly honest, however, if I was you, I'd still use my race to my advantage, sad as it is to have to be truly honest with oneself about what is happening. (I.e. for you to be admitted, someone else is rejected. Someone else was rejected for being white, just as in other situations in life a latina woman may be rejected for being latina. It's the flip side of your acceptance. It's racism.)

That said, good luck to you, it sounds like you're worthy of admission based on what I consider to be better measures (e.g. community service, etc.) Consider taking the LSAT again if you don't get into a good law school. Waiting one year may be less than ideal, but going to Cornell one year later beats going to a much poorer school right now. I'm sure you're capable of getting at least another 5 points, so consider a class. With a 160 you could get into even better schools, check out law school numbers and look for the URMs.

Good luck, and definitely do all the follow-up activities you mentioned.


Not true... White legacies would get in with a 150... Trust me on that... If you're a Kennedy, Bush, Biden, Clinton, Rockerfeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Morgan, Roosevelt and the list goes on... You would get in... Without a doubt... Quit the bitching... For the couple of URMs that get in with a lower score... I bet there are twice as many white legacies getting in...

[If you're curious... No, I am not a URM.]


I beg to differ. Bush was rejected frum UT law school, granted he may not have scored 150+. And couple of URMs, what are you smoking? Looks like most decently ranked schools have 20% or higher URM, many of whom are probably below the median LSAT.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:54 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Archived Posts: 1680
LSATfromNC wrote:
KosovasLostSon wrote:
pretzellogic wrote:
Lisa7n99 wrote:
hmm....maybe you should take a look at my application. there's a few good tidbits in there other than the "Chicano/Mexican" box. lol.


I'm sure there are. Many people would consider you to be an applicant worth admitting based on your 150/3.XX GPA, life experience, and demonstrated goodness.

However, to get into a top school like Cornell, you need numbers, period. (OR, you need a "racial advantage" -- sorry, but that's what it is.)

I can guarantee you, there will NEVER, EVER be a white man (or woman) who gets into Cornell with a 150. It just won't happen excepting cases of Nobel Prize winners (who would likely pull a 170 anyhow!) or a famous writer (like the Prozac Nation lady with a 160+) . (If someone finds a case of a white guy with not incredible experience getting in, it's either BS or a massive exception. However you'll find a few 150 LSAT black/latino men and women who scrape in.)

So, regardless of the details of their early decision program, the only reason you have a single prayer of getting into Cornell is because of your "race". (Of course, your other attributes will make a difference, HOWEVER, as mallard pointed out, URM status [particularly black or latino status] is a necessary [but not sufficient] condition for acceptance with a 150 LSAT.)

If you don't want it to be the only reason you get into Cornell, cease checking boxes on applications of all kinds that indicate you are a minority.

Such boxes are used for one thing and one thing only: racism -- the making of decisions based on race. Being perfectly honest, however, if I was you, I'd still use my race to my advantage, sad as it is to have to be truly honest with oneself about what is happening. (I.e. for you to be admitted, someone else is rejected. Someone else was rejected for being white, just as in other situations in life a latina woman may be rejected for being latina. It's the flip side of your acceptance. It's racism.)

That said, good luck to you, it sounds like you're worthy of admission based on what I consider to be better measures (e.g. community service, etc.) Consider taking the LSAT again if you don't get into a good law school. Waiting one year may be less than ideal, but going to Cornell one year later beats going to a much poorer school right now. I'm sure you're capable of getting at least another 5 points, so consider a class. With a 160 you could get into even better schools, check out law school numbers and look for the URMs.

Good luck, and definitely do all the follow-up activities you mentioned.


Not true... White legacies would get in with a 150... Trust me on that... If you're a Kennedy, Bush, Biden, Clinton, Rockerfeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Morgan, Roosevelt and the list goes on... You would get in... Without a doubt... Quit the bitching... For the couple of URMs that get in with a lower score... I bet there are twice as many white legacies getting in...

[If you're curious... No, I am not a URM.]


I beg to differ. Bush was rejected frum UT law school, granted he may not have scored 150+. And couple of URMs, what are you smoking? Looks like most decently ranked schools have 20% or higher URM, many of whom are probably below the median LSAT.


where do you see that stat?

minority =/= URM ; a significant portion (likely most) of their minority enrollment numbers are actually Asians

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=51444

quit your bitchin, white boy


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:14 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm
Archived Posts: 1396
lsac.org, it gives fairly accurate break down of race. Harvard has 30% minority. 1/3 of those are asian, the rest are URM and we are right back at around 20%. Quit bitchin, bitch.

I am not arguing against AA, just that it more prevalent than 150 lsat legacy admissions.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:46 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Archived Posts: 1680
LSATfromNC wrote:
lsac.org, it gives fairly accurate break down of race. Harvard has 30% minority. 1/3 of those are asian, the rest are URM and we are right back at around 20%. Quit bitchin, bitch.

I am not arguing against AA, just that it more prevalent than 150 lsat legacy admissions.


ahh...ok. so harvard, the one with the most URMs (in absolute terms and also as a percentage) barely hit 20%. your argument was that most elite schools had at least 20%. i'm not really trying to pick anything with you, but it's sometimes aggravating to see people perpetuate this notion that URMs are taking huge numbers of slots away from non-URMs, when there really aren't that many.

ps: i'm not an urm, despite my avatar :P


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:03 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm
Archived Posts: 1396
f0bolous wrote:
LSATfromNC wrote:
lsac.org, it gives fairly accurate break down of race. Harvard has 30% minority. 1/3 of those are asian, the rest are URM and we are right back at around 20%. Quit bitchin, bitch.

I am not arguing against AA, just that it more prevalent than 150 lsat legacy admissions.


ahh...ok. so harvard, the one with the most URMs (in absolute terms and also as a percentage) barely hit 20%. your argument was that most elite schools had at least 20%. i'm not really trying to pick anything with you, but it's sometimes aggravating to see people perpetuate this notion that URMs are taking huge numbers of slots away from non-URMs, when there really aren't that many.

ps: i'm not an urm, despite my avatar :P


I get what your saying, and I do not believe anyone is taking slots away from anyone. The slots belong to the law schools, not me, and they can give them to whoever they want to. However I will do my best to earn a slot somewhere.

I said decent ranked, not elite. I have honestly never looked at stats for a majority of the T14, as that is not where I will end up. I choose Harvard out of the blue, before tonight I have never looked at their stats for anything. I was referring to T1/T2 schools, where I have researched.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:12 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:34 pm
Archived Posts: 25
weird there were so many responses to this...no decision from Cornell yet but I am preparing and taking the LSAT again in June in case I am waitlisted. at this point. i'd prefer an up or down but i'll know all that in a few weeks...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:25 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:26 pm
Archived Posts: 349
.


Last edited by missv463 on Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:45 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:34 pm
Archived Posts: 25
Thanks, that's nice of you. I'm waiting patiently, and thinking of writing another email or letter just restating my interest but I don't have much more to add to my file since I am now out of school and just working......


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:24 pm 

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:25 am
Archived Posts: 140
I'd like to know how this situation turned out? Did Lisa get into Cornell Law?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:57 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm
Archived Posts: 1396
groundkontrol wrote:
I'd like to know how this situation turned out? Did Lisa get into Cornell Law?


Look in her post history. Doesn't look like it.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:28 am 

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:39 pm
Archived Posts: 725
mallard wrote:
paraducks wrote:
minority status certainly plays a role, but i find it unlikely that a t14 school wouldn't outright reject a 150 lsat score just because the applicant was a minority. it seems more likely to me that the meaningful work that you mentioned worked strongly in your favour, with the minority status providing a supplementary boost.


More like the "meaningful work" was a "supplementary boost" and the minority status was the strong help (10+ LSAT points). Cornell is in dire need of minorities and are well-known as a place to go in the T14.


No need to respond to this, Mallard, as I realize you posted this months ago. But since the thread was bumped, I thought I'd clarify that Cornell probably isn't really in "dire need of minorities." To the contrary, it's the most diverse of the T-14 (31% minority status).


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: 150 LSAT, deferred at Cornell Law
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:57 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:34 pm
Archived Posts: 25
Just for anyone who might be interested....i retook the lsat, got a 10+ point bump, and am reapplying.....this addendum is going to awkward ;)


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Princeton Review LSAT







copyright 2003-2010 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBBContact TLS